Re: 1960 to 1962 Reproduction Fuel Gauges - Failures?
Yea Tom. I too would like to know what the max current (energy) is being provided to the sender. Ken Anderson, in post #5, indicated that it was 'short protected'. Not sure what that means. If he is reading this thread perhaps he can clarify that for us. I would also like to know if this energy can change if a device in the gauge was to fail.
If a hard 12V is imposed on the sender and the tank is full, then 30 ohms will limit the current to about 400mA. This should not burn the sender, plus the rheostat element will be submerged in fuel - no oxygen and the fuel will be a heat sink. But --------- as the tank empty's, the 30 ohms goes down, the current goes up, and at some point the current will be high enough to melt the rheostat. Plus -------- at this point the rheostat will no longer be submerged in fuel, and gas fumes will instantly ignite, with devastating results. For our own peace of mind, I think we need to how the electronics is designed so we have a good feel for the intrinsic safety of the design. I am hoping Ken can provide this, and also if it was ever intrinsically tested.
-Dan-
Yea Tom. I too would like to know what the max current (energy) is being provided to the sender. Ken Anderson, in post #5, indicated that it was 'short protected'. Not sure what that means. If he is reading this thread perhaps he can clarify that for us. I would also like to know if this energy can change if a device in the gauge was to fail.
If a hard 12V is imposed on the sender and the tank is full, then 30 ohms will limit the current to about 400mA. This should not burn the sender, plus the rheostat element will be submerged in fuel - no oxygen and the fuel will be a heat sink. But --------- as the tank empty's, the 30 ohms goes down, the current goes up, and at some point the current will be high enough to melt the rheostat. Plus -------- at this point the rheostat will no longer be submerged in fuel, and gas fumes will instantly ignite, with devastating results. For our own peace of mind, I think we need to how the electronics is designed so we have a good feel for the intrinsic safety of the design. I am hoping Ken can provide this, and also if it was ever intrinsically tested.
-Dan-
Comment