1960 to 1962 Reproduction Fuel Gauges - Failures? - NCRS Discussion Boards

1960 to 1962 Reproduction Fuel Gauges - Failures?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Richard M.
    Super Moderator
    • August 31, 1988
    • 11324

    1960 to 1962 Reproduction Fuel Gauges - Failures?

    Have any of you successfully used the K & B reproduction fuel gauges? I'm havin' a bad stretch of luck lately.


    I decided to use reproduction "small" gauges for the 1960 I restored. A set of '59 gauges were in the cluster when I got it. I opted to get the repo meters and just doing it myself as a alternative to finding nice originals. All new repro gauges were fine.....for a while. The fuel gauge(s)......... a nightmare.


    Repro 60 left, orig 59 right
    P6210112.jpgP6210113.jpg

    Repro
    P6210116.jpg

    Orig
    P6210115.jpg


    When I built the electrical system up I dry tested the fuel gauge and new repro correct 0 to 30 ohm fuel sender on the bench, perfect. Installed everything in the car and tested again, Perfect. All electrical was good. After engine time and power time with about 1/4 tank showing on the gauge, one day I noticed the gauge at below "E" with power on. I put more gas in thinking it was truly low......Not. Next time I powered up, gauge read past "F". Next time "E". back and forth evert time I pwered up. Checked all of my suspect areas, tested sender, wiring, etc fine. Put a original 1961 fuel gauge in the circuit, jumpered with cables in the cluster wiring, worked fine.

    Pulled the gauge, tested on the bench, dead. Stuck past "F" when powered up. If you leave the sender wire off, and tap the needle to the right.....it goes to "F". BTW, these gauges now used digital electronics. Argh, I did that for 30 years as a career. I know what can happen with these if mishandled. I made sure I was safely grounded when working with them.

    Got a new gauge last week, tested on the bench before going back in the housing and cluster........Dead, Stuck past "F" when powered up. DOA.

    My test setup works perfectly on a original 1961 gauge unit I have here, simple....

    +12v to rear right lug
    -12v(gnd) to meter ground plane/case
    0 to 30 ohm potentiometer in series between -12v(gnd) and rear left lug.

    Saturday, Bill Harrison (harrisonspeedometer.com) and I were talking about the problem, and he said he hasn't used many repro fuel gauges, but invited me to his shop with my stuff to check it out. I brought the 2 gauges, my test setup and hopped in the C6 for a 90 min ride to Bill's. BTW he has a nice new shop and storefront space in the complex he's in. Very nice!

    So Bill and I spent about a hour playin' around trying to get an idea what's wrong. Both dead. Stuck beyond "F" (pegged) on power up. He verified my '61 gauge. Perfect.

    I suspect a floating ground may be a design issue and causing the digital circuits to fail. i.e. Static charges in the car when the battery is disconnected and the ground floats, causing havoc in the digital design. I had a few experiences like that in my career. I wish now I KISS'd and got original "analog" friendly gauges. (KISS-Keep It Simple Stupid)

    Going to phone K & B today and speak to Ken about the problem.

    Rich
    Last edited by Richard M.; February 10, 2014, 07:31 AM.
  • Dan D.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • November 5, 2008
    • 1323

    #2
    Re: 1960 to 1962 Reproduction Fuel Gauges - Failures?

    Rich, I cannot believe these gauges are electronic. Whats wrong with the original design? They work just fine. Are the other gauges electronic too?

    Regardless, if you can tap the needle and it moves, then it sounds like a mechanical problem. Needle hanging up, but you know this. So if you load it with 15 ohms using your pot, will it always read 1/2 full?

    -Dan-

    Comment

    • Richard M.
      Super Moderator
      • August 31, 1988
      • 11324

      #3
      Re: 1960 to 1962 Reproduction Fuel Gauges - Failures?

      The repros are latest technology, yes, the temp is digital too, and ammeter is a shunt like original design, oil is mechanical like original.

      Temperature (orig & repro)

      orig 59 lefts, repro 60 rights
      P6210105.jpgP6210107.jpg

      Ammeter & Oil (repros) No internal pcs
      P6210121.jpg

      Nope, not a mechanical. The needle sits at left, tap lightly, and it's a slow, gradual sweep to the right then pegging. It's clearly electrical movement in the coil. Bill & I were scratching our heads Saturday trying to figure it out, on BOTH gauges. We gave up. I didn't have my oscilloscope, logic analyzer, test probes and simulation software handy to diagnose the failure.

      I'll report back when I talk to Ken at K&B(Alpharetta, GA) later. He's probably preparing for another bash of bad weather in Georgia so he's probably going to be unavailable for a while.

      Oh, BTW one more tidbit of information.... These repro gauges have a slight fallback. When off, the needles disappear to the left, unlike originals. When power is applied, they move slightly to the right to their start points, then to they're respective "readings". i.e. example cold engine, power off, Temp needle hidden to the left, power on, it moves to below the first "tick", then moves when temp rises normally. You can see it in my pictures.

      Bill Harrison had a good idea........Bend the bottom of the needle down a bit more so it hits the bottom edge of the face, to keep the needle a bit to the right at rest.

      I suspect Judges will notice this "no power needle behavior"........ eventually.
      Last edited by Richard M.; February 10, 2014, 09:14 AM. Reason: more pics, more info

      Comment

      • Dan D.
        Extremely Frequent Poster
        • November 5, 2008
        • 1323

        #4
        Re: 1960 to 1962 Reproduction Fuel Gauges - Failures?

        Okay Rich, but I still don't understand why its not the needle hanging up. It could be a heavily dampened spring loaded movement. In your photo it looks like it's enclosed and you can't see the actual needle movement.

        But one other thing comes to my little pea brain mind. Not knowing how the electronics is designed, I would hope that if something in the electronics shorted out, like a transistor, it would not put a hard 12V on the sender line. I just do not trust any of this repro stuff, especially anything electrical/electronic. If I were you I would return this thing to the sender and use the original. They are obviously no good, and even if you did get one that works - no telling how long it will continue to function after the warranty period is up. I think you are beating a dead horse again.

        But to me, the highlight would have been the 90 minute ride in your C6. That would be heaven to me right now. We are freezing, blowing, and drifting here in upstate NY.

        -Dan-

        Comment

        • Ken A.
          Very Frequent User
          • July 31, 1986
          • 929

          #5
          Re: 1960 to 1962 Reproduction Fuel Gauges - Failures?

          Rich,
          The gauge must be grounded to work correctly (the shiney strip o the back of the gauge) and it is short protected-unlike the od meter movements. BTW, Bill has not purchased any of the new gauges. We have sold hundreds with no complaints. The problems only occur when the customer/installer tries to set up a "test without grounding the gauge. Dan-most of the old gauges have been restored and are pretty in accurate.
          Ken

          Comment

          • Dan D.
            Extremely Frequent Poster
            • November 5, 2008
            • 1323

            #6
            Re: 1960 to 1962 Reproduction Fuel Gauges - Failures?

            Good point Ken. I know the gauges have to have a ground return, but did think of it. Don't know if Rich grounded his test setup or not. But this does not explain why his failed in the car. The gauge pod is grounded when installed in the car. I will let you and Rich sort this out now. Over and Out.

            -Dan-

            Comment

            • Richard M.
              Super Moderator
              • August 31, 1988
              • 11324

              #7
              Attached Files

              Comment

              • Thomas H.
                Extremely Frequent Poster
                • August 31, 2005
                • 1058

                #8
                Re: 1960 to 1962 Reproduction Fuel Gauges - Failures?

                Looks like you spread your "fun" across many projects Rich!

                I am surprised to see that the repop gauge appears to use an air core meter for the meter movement vs the old d'arsonval (sp?) type movement. I have used air core meters in the aircraft instruments we used to design. The meter requires a sin +/- and a cos +/- signal to work correctly. The electronics are used to generate these signals based on the input from the sender. If any one of the four signals are missing, the gauge will usually drive to one direction or the other. Or it could work fine in one quadrant and jump through the next.

                When power is shut off, the pointer will move (float) in a direction based on the weight of the needle unless they have included some sort of "return to zero" circuit which would drive the needle back to a specific point, in your case, empty.

                Nice looking gauges.

                Tom
                Last edited by Thomas H.; February 10, 2014, 12:41 PM. Reason: grammer..............
                1958, 283/245, White/red - Top Flight, October 2016
                1960, Black/black, 283/230 4sp
                1966, Black/Red, 327/350 4sp w/AC
                1967, 427/390, 4sp, Goodwood Green, Coupe
                1971 LS5, 4sp, coupe, Bridgehampton Blue
                2007 Z06, Lemans Blue

                Newsletter Editor, Delaware Valley Chapter

                Comment

                • Richard M.
                  Super Moderator
                  • August 31, 1988
                  • 11324

                  #9
                  Re: 1960 to 1962 Reproduction Fuel Gauges - Failures?

                  Hi Tom, Yes K & B did a nice job on them. It's quite nice to have a reproduction available as the old ones wither away in time. As I mentioned, I chose them to restore a set for the '60 I'm on, and saved much time searching for used & "functional" originals. Most were complete dual gauge assemblies, and all I needed were the meter movements.

                  Rich

                  Comment

                  • Richard M.
                    Super Moderator
                    • August 31, 1988
                    • 11324

                    #10
                    Re: 1960 to 1962 Reproduction Fuel Gauges - Failures?

                    I believe I found the problem with gauge #1. I did a little research and drew up a diagram of the digital circuit using my eye-loop to identify the components and trace the circuit etches the best I could. Coming in from the power lug, 12v goes to a 5 volt semiconductor voltage regulator, U1. It's marked 78L05L, a industry standard ID for electronic components of this type.

                    Spec here...
                    http://media.digikey.com/pdf/Data%20...s/NJM78L00.pdf

                    It simply takes up to 30 volts in, 12 volts in this case, and delivers a regulated 5 volts out. 5 volts is needed for the other digital circuits as their power source. There's a 8 pin device, marked 358 EZ727 which I cannot identify, and 2 other 3 pin transistors, Q1 & Q2 locations.

                    Anyways, the VR is dead. I get 12 volts in and only 1.39 volts out. Because the other digital devices need 5 volts, the meter won't function.

                    P2110002.jpg P2110003.jpg P2110004.jpg P2110005.jpg


                    I suspect the problem was either infant mortality of this device after working for a few months, or it lost it's ground input and the input voltage floated with no negative reference and destroyed the device. I have seen this anomaly throughout my career in electronics. When ground floats in digital devices, they can self destruct.

                    And.....I think I may have the answer to why ground floated. When I restored the Fuel/Temp gauge cans, I painted the backside silver after bead blasting to clean it up. The ground for the fuel gauge is dependent on the mechanical contact of the case to the cluster, then to the ground wire in the harness. Looking at this case's mount tabs, there are some scrape marks from the Palnuts when I installed it in the cluster, but it may not have been tight enough the first time installed. Because I didn't have a good ground connection, I believe it's possible that the VR floated ground, and.......... kapoof.

                    My fault, but I need to contact Ken so he can add some cautions to the installation instructions and possibly make some changes to the circuit to prevent device failures on future builds. I really like these gauges. It's great that we have alternatives to the hard to find old stuff.

                    Gauge #2, was DOA when i got it. I verified that the VR on that one works, 12 volts in, a good 5.1 volts out. Something else is wrong with that one but i don't really have time to play with that one, maybe later. I'm getting a replacement from Zip due in tomorrow, so hopefully that one will be fine. BTW, the Temp Gauge uses NO digital circuitry, so the ground float never hurt that one.

                    Rich
                    p.s. Sorry if my spellng s off lately. My "I" isn't workng too good on my keyboard. I can't catch 'em all.

                    Comment

                    • Dan D.
                      Extremely Frequent Poster
                      • November 5, 2008
                      • 1323

                      #11
                      Re: 1960 to 1962 Reproduction Fuel Gauges - Failures?

                      Hi Rich,

                      Glad you found the problem. But these 78L series 3 terminal regulators are extremely reliable, and I doubt very much if it failed after working for a while. I'm sure you know too that all these 78L series devices are over-current proof. If current or power is exceeded they will just shut down and not self destruct. With 1.39 volts out I would say there is a short somewhere in the circuit that is dragging the voltage down until the current is at a safe level. I don't believe the device is bad, but you would have to isolate the output pin in order to tell. I do believe that your lack of ground return is what destroyed the gauge. When you get your new gauge I would just send these two back and not void your warranty.

                      -Dan-

                      Comment

                      • Thomas H.
                        Extremely Frequent Poster
                        • August 31, 2005
                        • 1058

                        #12
                        Re: 1960 to 1962 Reproduction Fuel Gauges - Failures?

                        The 358 is more then likely an LM358 op amp.

                        As Dan said, most of the linear regulators on the market today have overcurrent protection built in. They will throttle back the output to limit the current and thus reduce the possibility of internal part damage. One thing they don't like is reverse voltage (putting + on - and vice versa). Usually though the designer will put a diode inline with the power going to the regulator to protect against reverse voltage.

                        But, one thing that a lot of circuit designers don't always design for are transients. In automotive electronics there is a thing called load dump that can produce power transients of upwards of 80v. If there is no protection in the power line feeding a regulated circuit, any sort of load dump or overvoltage transient can easily damage the electronics. Doesn't take much to "let the smoke out" of a part if it is not protected.

                        If you want to try to replace the regulator, go on Texas Instruments web site and a lot of times they will send out sample parts on request. Otherwise, they are easily bought from sources like Digikey or Mouser.

                        Keep in mind...., please don't think what I wrote is any sort of critique of the circuits used in the gauges Rich is working with. I have no first hand knowledge of the circuits used and am just providing some "tech talk" based solely on my experiences. From what I can tell the gauges Rich has are well made and the support being provided is tops.

                        Tom
                        Last edited by Thomas H.; February 11, 2014, 01:30 PM. Reason: Added Keep in mind...... part
                        1958, 283/245, White/red - Top Flight, October 2016
                        1960, Black/black, 283/230 4sp
                        1966, Black/Red, 327/350 4sp w/AC
                        1967, 427/390, 4sp, Goodwood Green, Coupe
                        1971 LS5, 4sp, coupe, Bridgehampton Blue
                        2007 Z06, Lemans Blue

                        Newsletter Editor, Delaware Valley Chapter

                        Comment

                        • Dan D.
                          Extremely Frequent Poster
                          • November 5, 2008
                          • 1323

                          #13
                          Re: 1960 to 1962 Reproduction Fuel Gauges - Failures?

                          Yea Tom, the 358 is most likely an op amp (operational amplifier - a very common electronic device). Rich can tell us if a series diode is on the input, but I doubt very much if Rich put any reverse voltage on the gauge.

                          With no ground return on the gauge, because of paint on the rear surface, then the only ground return the gauge would have had would have been through the sender. With not much gas in the tank, it would be very close to ground potential. Not knowing how it is designed, this could have provided a current path through places it was not intended to. So my guess would be this is was what happened.

                          -Dan-

                          Comment

                          • Thomas H.
                            Extremely Frequent Poster
                            • August 31, 2005
                            • 1058

                            #14
                            Re: 1960 to 1962 Reproduction Fuel Gauges - Failures?

                            Yup, Current needs to go somewhere and through the sender is a good bet.

                            Hmmmm.......... In a past life, part of our product line was a fuel gauging system for general aviation aircraft. One of the requirements was that the energy provided to the resistive fuel sender needed to be limited to 25 micro joules (going by memory here.........) to maintain intrinsic safety (read, not enough energy to cause a spark big enough to ignite any fuel or vapors). I'd be interested to know what the signal conditioning interface is ahead of the op amp. It didn't take much circuit wise limit the energy to to meet the requirements, but we all had our fingers crossed during the actual qualification testing. (Where's the Kaboom, there was supposed to be an earth shattering Kaboom!)

                            Fun stuff.

                            Tom
                            1958, 283/245, White/red - Top Flight, October 2016
                            1960, Black/black, 283/230 4sp
                            1966, Black/Red, 327/350 4sp w/AC
                            1967, 427/390, 4sp, Goodwood Green, Coupe
                            1971 LS5, 4sp, coupe, Bridgehampton Blue
                            2007 Z06, Lemans Blue

                            Newsletter Editor, Delaware Valley Chapter

                            Comment

                            • Richard M.
                              Super Moderator
                              • August 31, 1988
                              • 11324

                              #15
                              Re: 1960 to 1962 Reproduction Fuel Gauges - Failures?

                              Yes, gauge #1, arrived BO'd from CC late summer IIRC, has no protection diode on the input. Ken said his new ones have it, and gauge #2 bought a while ago and recently installed has the diode. see pics. Good catch on the LM358. I used to test these things years ago. Yikes I forgot a lot of this stuff.

                              Gauge #2 has a protection diode(marked DEE) between 12v+ stud and C1, and U2 pin 8(green wire) of the LM358(power pin).

                              I read up a bit more on the VR. Yes it's ruggedized for short circuit current limit and thermal overload protection. I wanted to open the output lead on it and test it, and if truly failed, swap it out with the good one from gauge #2 but I don't want to jeopardize warranty, unless Ken asks me to do that. I'm planning to call him later today when I get time. This '60 is going to NY Thursday morning so I have some other last minute stuff to do on the punch list now.

                              Thanks for the info,
                              Rich

                              gauge#1
                              P2110016.jpg

                              gauge#2 diode and green wire to U2
                              P2110015.jpg

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              Searching...Please wait.
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                              There are no results that meet this criteria.
                              Search Result for "|||"