big tank repair
Collapse
X
-
Re: big tank repair
Photo below shows the vertical reinforcement that was riveted to the back side of non-tanker rear bulkheads; tankers didn't use it.Attached Files- Top
Comment
-
Re: big tank repair
Here's a pic I took at Bloomington '87, showing NO metal reinforcement (where the crayon "51" is). IIRC, this was on a split window; don't know the VIN, and can't explain the dark fiberglass.
I still think that early '63's (for which Ron's # 3022 applies) would not have had this feature; anybody got a '63 AIM with revision note ?Attached Files- Top
Comment
-
Re: big tank repair
You may have nailed it - I don't show that 3850114 reinforcement in my AIM's until 1964; looks like it was '64-'67 only.- Top
Comment
-
Re: big tank repair
Nice informational thread, but before you do anything, drain the tank and let it sit open for 7-10 days, drop a light into it and let your digital cellphone TV camera go down and take pictures. Maybe it's simple as a piece of metal that rubbed against the tank from outside until the hole appears.- Top
Comment
-
Re: big tank repair
Nice informational thread, but before you do anything, drain the tank and let it sit open for 7-10 days, drop a light into it and let your digital cellphone TV camera go down and take pictures. Maybe it's simple as a piece of metal that rubbed against the tank from outside until the hole appears.- Top
Comment
-
Re: big tank repair
... and that GM #3850114 doesn't look like a part number that would have been around for most, if not all, of the 1963 model year.In Appreciation of John Hinckley- Top
Comment
-
Re: big tank repair
This is of my late-late '65 convertible, but the rear partition "tub" is the same for both body styles. The real sloppy job # 204 is visible. Took this shot when I had my regular 20 gal tank out.Attached Files- Top
Comment
-
Re: big tank repair
This is a little late, but I finally located this pic, which shows where the six rivet holes would be if the metal reinforcement was removed for the N03 filler nozzle on a coupe.
This is of my late-late '65 convertible, but the rear partition "tub" is the same for both body styles. The real sloppy job # 204 is visible. Took this shot when I had my regular 20 gal tank out.
Again, my car is a early Nov. car which I purchased in 1968, radio delete with racing seat belts and rear scoops at one time. Cat appeared to be a bright blue color at one time, now dark blue as purchased. So the car was repainted between 1963 to 1968.- Top
Comment
-
Re: big tank repair
This is a little late, but I finally located this pic, which shows where the six rivet holes would be if the metal reinforcement was removed for the N03 filler nozzle on a coupe.
This is of my late-late '65 convertible, but the rear partition "tub" is the same for both body styles. The real sloppy job # 204 is visible. Took this shot when I had my regular 20 gal tank out.- Top
Comment
-
Re: big tank repair
- Top
Comment
-
Re: big tank repair
This is a little late, but I finally located this pic, which shows where the six rivet holes would be if the metal reinforcement was removed for the N03 filler nozzle on a coupe.
This is of my late-late '65 convertible, but the rear partition "tub" is the same for both body styles. The real sloppy job # 204 is visible. Took this shot when I had my regular 20 gal tank out.Attached Files- Top
Comment
-
Re: big tank repair
Nice shots, Ron. For a '63 tanker in the early 3000's VIN range, you could consider it to be considered (still) a "pilot" 36gal car, IMO. Probably no more than a dozen had been built prior to yours. I see you've lifted the cover up to expose the tank and fill/vent hoses. Anything written on the tank ?- Top
Comment
Comment