It's BAAAACK; the $1.8 million '67 with non-original engine

[Wayne M.]

eBay, of course; and he has some kind words to say about NCRS (read question to/from seller).

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Chevrolet-Corvette-427-car-only-900AA-TUXEDO-BLACK-L68-C60_W0QQitemZ300411176837QQcmdZViewItemQQptZUS_Cars_Trucks?hash=item45f1e6c785

[Chris S.]

Re: It's BAAAACK; the $1.8 million '67 with non-original engine

sticker looks brand new!

[Patrick T.]

Re: It's BAAAACK; the $1.8 million '67 with non-original engine

I know I've seen those background steps in other eBay auctions. This guy could also use spell check. I'm sure he would sell it at Barrett-Jackson.

Q: you want almost 2 mill, what no engine pics? maybe ad 20 more pics or so... Mar-26-10

A: JUST ASK, "NCRS" IT'S DONE ALL THE TIME... NOT SELLING THE CAR BECAUSE OF THE ENGINE PICS, SELLING THE CAR BECAUSE OF THE "RARENESS" OF... "THE CAR", ITSELF. THE ONLY ONE IN THE WORLD! YOU CAN PUT THE CORRECT: (DATE CODED ENGINE), IN THE CAR - "YOURSELF" - NO QUESS WORK! - IT'S DONE ALL THE TIME, JUST ASK, NCRS... FEEL GOOD ABOUT KNOWING EVERYTHING ABOUT THE CORRECT ENGINE FOR THIS CAR - NO QUESS WORK!

[Donald T.]

Re: It's BAAAACK; the $1.8 million '67 with non-original engine

That's not a bad price...

He his referring to Zimbabwean dollars, right?

[Paul B.]

Re: It's BAAAACK; the $1.8 million '67 with non-original engine

.....such a rare car I can't believe ProTeam hasn't snapped this baby up.

[Bill I.]

Re: It's BAAAACK; the $1.8 million '67 with non-original engine

Again, and I'm probably going to say it again. "They STILL walk among us" Bill

[Paul B.]

Re: It's BAAAACK; the $1.8 million '67 with non-original engine

....me thinks it's the only '67 in the world asking $1.8 million with the wrong engine in it.

[Edward J.]

Re: It's BAAAACK; the $1.8 million '67 with non-original engine

Whats with the tire snow tires on car. or at least they look that way. 1.8 mil. you would think it would at least have a set of original tires or even repro.s

[Ronald L.]

Re: It's BAAAACK; the $1.8 million '67 with non-original engine

You guys want to really have some fun, go to the sellers feedback and click on all the recent parts he has bought, like March and Feb 2010.

[Donald O.]

Re: It's BAAAACK; the $1.8 million '67 with non-original engine

I know the car and the owner.

The car has an LS6 454, no 427 tricarb
no air cond
repop seat covers, poorly done
incorrect trans with Hurst linkage
incorrect differential
needs to be repainted, again
has wrong casting of brake M/c and calipers
no ignition shielding
no P-O-P
no tank sticker

and this list should be much longer

[Joe L.]

Re: It's BAAAACK; the $1.8 million '67 with non-original engine

As I've said many times before, if one considers any combination of options and colors, just about every Corvette of the period is one-of-a-kind. Yet, the seller is making a big deal of the fact that this car is one-of-a-kind because of the combination of options (and "non-options").

This car has certain desirable options, but it also lacks many desirable options. So, what's the big deal?

[Joe L.]

Re: It's BAAAACK; the $1.8 million '67 with non-original engine

sticker looks brand new!

Chris------


The window sticker looks to be unquestionably a reproduction window sticker (which can be created to any option configuration desired). So, it does not represent any real sort of documentation, at all.

[Michael J.]

Re: It's BAAAACK; the $1.8 million '67 with non-original engine

This obviously defies any rational explanation. Either this person is seriously unhinged mentally, or he is the reincarnation of P.T. Barum, "there is a sucker born every minute".

[Paul L.]

Re: It's BAAAACK; the $1.8 million '67 with non-original engine

It may be a senior moment. I have them.

[Michael J.]

Re: It's BAAAACK; the $1.8 million '67 with non-original engine

It may be a senior moment. I have them.

Right, maybe he has slipped a digit? Maybe it is "only" $180,000.00