When did double crimp brake hoses become required? - NCRS Discussion Boards

When did double crimp brake hoses become required?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • John D.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • November 30, 1979
    • 5507

    #16
    Re: When did double crimp brake hoses become required?

    My 63-the LWC has NOS single crimp brake hoses on it. A judge asked me why I had them on the car because they were unsafe. I agree that they are unsafe but am leaving them on anyhow because they are original. I see mentioned there should not be a deduct for double crimp hoses. I don't know if this is a judging norm or not. John

    Comment

    • Duke W.
      Beyond Control Poster
      • December 31, 1992
      • 15610

      #17
      Re: When did double crimp brake hoses become required?

      Originally posted by Chuck Sangerhausen (20817)
      I started to comment on this question very early, but then thought better of it...No insult intended, Paul, but I've been "sand-bagged" by enough academic midyear trivia questions.

      When the questioner asks, when DID the "double crimp" on brake hoses become standard, immediately the question is begged...Is this some kind of implied "mid-year" speak that all midyear people understand? What the **** is a "double-crimp"?...Does that mean the "crimp" is twice as wide as before?...Maybe, it's crimped twice on the same area, only twice as hard the second time?

      I assumed, as you did, Gregster, that the question related to the double flaring method used on brake lines forever, and discussed in Chassis Service Manuals since before midyears. Sometimes, it's better to let old hounds snooze on the porch, Gregster.
      I agree, Chuck! I've never heard of "double crimp" brakes hoses. I believe there is a FMVSS that covers brake hoses. Anybody know the number? Most of them are online as I've researched them before.

      Also, hose ends are usually "swaged" not "crimped".

      Given the no part number change history, above, sumpin' ain't right, but, then, everyone knows that Chuck and I are morons.

      Duke

      Comment

      • Nick C.
        Very Frequent User
        • August 31, 1998
        • 542

        #18
        Late service replacement "double crimp" brake hose

        I agree with Howard... I do not think the evidence supports use of "double crimp" brake hoses in '67.

        Attached is a photo of the object in question, installed on my '67 driver approx. 15 years ago. I removed a leaky "single crimp" now buried in a pile of junk parts on a back shelf.

        Hope this helps clarify things a bit.
        Attached Files

        Comment

        Working...
        Searching...Please wait.
        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
        An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
        There are no results that meet this criteria.
        Search Result for "|||"