Fuel sender - NCRS Discussion Boards

Fuel sender

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • John P.
    Very Frequent User
    • August 31, 2002
    • 215

    Fuel sender

    Hi, I have a 65 roadster, had to replace a nonfunctioning sender. The gauge works fine when activating the sender boom manually-that is when I raise the float the gauge moves to full.

    The problem appears to be that the float level needs to be altered to give a true reading. That is, when the
    tank is half full, the reading is 1/4 or less.

    So question is does the float need to be positioned lower or higher in the tank? Not easy to do it by hand-I have tried. But which way? Seems it should be lowered, but now not so sure. Thanks.
  • John H.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • December 1, 1997
    • 16513

    #2
    Re: Fuel sender

    Originally posted by John Pickens (38601)
    Hi, I have a 65 roadster, had to replace a nonfunctioning sender. The gauge works fine when activating the sender boom manually-that is when I raise the float the gauge moves to full.

    The problem appears to be that the float level needs to be altered to give a true reading. That is, when the
    tank is half full, the reading is 1/4 or less.

    So question is does the float need to be positioned lower or higher in the tank? Not easy to do it by hand-I have tried. But which way? Seems it should be lowered, but now not so sure. Thanks.
    John -

    Step #1 is to verify the resistance range of the new sending unit; remove all three connectors from the harness to the sending unit, and connect an ohmmeter across both of the pin terminals on the sender - it should show zero ohms with the float arm all the way down (empty) and 90 ohms with the float arm all the way up (full).

    If that checks out, refer to the sending unit photo below. To alter the gauge reading so it shows 1/2-full with the tank 1/2-full, the idea is to raise the point where the float rod exits the resistor housing (increasing resistance) without changing the position of the float itself by bending the rod.

    If the sending unit you removed is an original AC unit, I'd recommend you send it to John Wolf & Co. - he'll send it back better than new (www.johnwolfco.com).


    FuelSenderAC.jpg

    Comment

    • Jim D.
      Extremely Frequent Poster
      • June 30, 1985
      • 2884

      #3
      Re: Fuel sender

      I've never seen a replacement, including the Chinese Delco or Fargo units that read correctly. Have John Wolf restore your original.

      Comment

      • John P.
        Very Frequent User
        • August 31, 2002
        • 215

        #4
        Re: Fuel sender

        Well that seems like the consensus. Thanks for the replies.

        Comment

        • Gerard F.
          Extremely Frequent Poster
          • June 30, 2004
          • 3805

          #5
          Re: Fuel sender

          Originally posted by John Hinckley (29964)
          John -

          Step #1 is to verify the resistance range of the new sending unit; remove all three connectors from the harness to the sending unit, and connect an ohmmeter across both of the pin terminals on the sender - it should show zero ohms with the float arm all the way down (empty) and 90 ohms with the float arm all the way up (full).

          If that checks out, refer to the sending unit photo below. To alter the gauge reading so it shows 1/2-full with the tank 1/2-full, the idea is to raise the point where the float rod exits the resistor housing (increasing resistance) without changing the position of the float itself by bending the rod.

          If the sending unit you removed is an original AC unit, I'd recommend you send it to John Wolf & Co. - he'll send it back better than new (www.johnwolfco.com).


          [ATTACH=CONFIG]40916[/ATTACH]
          John,

          Nice pic


          Here's a test of that unit, after I cleaned up the inside of the rheostat.

          Float Down:



          Float Up:



          The box was for a replacement and was labelled "defective Vette". But the sender inside was an original.
          All it needed was a little tender care.

          Having fun again,
          Attached Files
          Jerry Fuccillo
          1967 327/300 Convertible since 1968

          Comment

          Working...
          Searching...Please wait.
          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
          An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
          There are no results that meet this criteria.
          Search Result for "|||"