'58 BW T10 Lube Procedure - NCRS Discussion Boards

'58 BW T10 Lube Procedure

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • David B.
    Expired
    • July 7, 2011
    • 88

    '58 BW T10 Lube Procedure

    A few rookie questions about my Borg Warner T10 4-speed:

    - Where is the fill plug? Can't seem to find a picture.

    - How do you tell when the oil level is correct?

    - Is NAPA Stalube GL4 the right oil?

    - Other lube tips?

    Bonus question: What oil for the differential? GL4? GL5?

    As always, thanks, guys!

    Dave
  • John F.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • March 23, 2008
    • 2406

    #2
    Re: '58 BW T10 Lube Procedure

    David, there should be a plug on the passenger side of the main case. 90 weight gear oil is the same for the trans and the rear end. Remove the plugs from both and fill to where you can feel it with your finger. Just a little below the hole. Clean up the threads and snug back up. You don't need to overtighten.
    Last edited by John F.; June 18, 2012, 04:25 PM. Reason: Added sentence

    Comment

    • Don H.
      Extremely Frequent Poster
      • December 1, 1981
      • 1487

      #3
      Re: '58 BW T10 Lube Procedure

      Dave, The transmission filler is a square head plug on the right (passenger) side. I use 70-80 weight gear lube in both the tranny and rear end (with posi additive if it is a posi in the rear end). Both you should feel the fluid with your finger when you reach in but do not fill all the way to the hole. Good luck, Don H.

      Comment

      • John H.
        Beyond Control Poster
        • December 1, 1997
        • 16513

        #4
        Re: '58 BW T10 Lube Procedure

        Originally posted by David Berry (53525)
        A few rookie questions about my Borg Warner T10 4-speed:

        - Where is the fill plug? Can't seem to find a picture.
        Dave -

        Your T-10 has two plugs - the upper one is the fill plug, and the bottom one is the drain plug.


        60T10_1800.jpg

        Comment

        • Bruce B.
          Extremely Frequent Poster
          • May 31, 1996
          • 2930

          #5
          Re: '58 BW T10 Lube Procedure

          Dave,
          Just so you don't get surprized; after you fill the trans there is a possibility some oil might leak out the countershaft hole (I think thats what its called) at the front of the transmission. You can't see the shaft with the trans in the car but you might see oil. It is no big deal and it will stop leaking when the oil level goes down below the shaft hole.
          The shaft hole can be sealed with silicone if and when you have the transmission out of the car.

          Comment

          • David B.
            Expired
            • July 7, 2011
            • 88

            #6
            Re: '58 BW T10 Lube Procedure

            Gentlemen, thank you all so much for the great wisdom. John H., that picture is exactly what I needed. All the pictures that I found showed the unit from the driver's side.

            I take it that as long as I use 70-to-90-weight gear oil, I'll be okay. I found a lot of fuss on some other tranny forums about GL4 vs. GL5. Is the GL spec really that crucial?

            By the way, I'm having a little trouble shifting into 1st and reverse. Is that a symptom of low oil or a synchronizer issue?

            Dave
            Last edited by David B.; June 19, 2012, 06:10 AM.

            Comment

            • Don H.
              Extremely Frequent Poster
              • December 1, 1981
              • 1487

              #7
              Re: '58 BW T10 Lube Procedure

              Dave, The shifting problem could also be the linkage adjustment - hopefully an easy fix. Don H.

              Comment

              • Cecil L.
                Very Frequent User
                • May 31, 1980
                • 449

                #8
                Re: '58 BW T10 Lube Procedure

                On 57-58 should be filled to 1/2" below the filler hole. In 59, the case was changed to move the filler hole down to prevent overfilling. It then would be filled to the bottom of the hole.

                Comment

                • Duke W.
                  Beyond Control Poster
                  • January 1, 1993
                  • 15662

                  #9
                  Re: '58 BW T10 Lube Procedure

                  The original spec for the transmission and axle oil was Mil-L-2105. This mil-spec was cancelled some years ago and replaced with API 80W-90 GL-5.

                  There are stories on the internet about "synchornizer corrosion" from GL-5, but I have yet to see any documented evidence of synchronizer corrosion on these 50-year old transmissions, some of which might still have the original factory fill oil in them. It's amazing to me that guys believe all these stories without a shred of evidence.

                  I am aware that there is some evidence that GL-5 may cause "yellow metal" corrosion at very high temperatures - on the order of 250F or above, but it would be rare for the oil in the transmission to exceed 200F - maybe in serious road racing in hot weather. It appears that some oil marketers are hyping this issue to promote their products, but I think it's bunk!

                  GL-5 has an EP additive that is absolutely necessary for the hypoid gear set in the axle. GL-4 lacks this additive and GL-4 is the typical spec for modern manual transmissions and transaxles that don't contain hypoid gears. Modern Corvettes have a sort of "transaxle", but the axle and transmission parts of the unit are isolated. They each have their own oil supply - GL-5 in the axle and GL-4 in the transmission.

                  The trend toward "lighter" manual transmission oils started with new designs in the seventies. Many speced ATF, which has a SAE gear oil viscosity range of 70W-75 with a GL-4 rating. This proved inadequate in some cases, which started a trend to synthetic based 75W-90 GL-4s. Since the EP additive is only necessary for hypoid gears, it follows that GL-4 might be okay for vintage transmissions that specified Mil-L-2105, but I am aware of no long term durability tests that support this conclusion, so my recommendation is to stick with GL-5 as there may be detail internal design differences in modern transmissions that make them compatible with GL-4.

                  If you have a Positraction axle, you will also need the anti-chatter additive.

                  Duke
                  Last edited by Duke W.; June 19, 2012, 11:41 AM.

                  Comment

                  • Douglas C.
                    Very Frequent User
                    • August 31, 1990
                    • 384

                    #10
                    Re: '58 BW T10 Lube Procedure

                    Good ole 80 - 90 fluid will be good, just don't use synthetic fluid.

                    Ask me how I know!!

                    Comment

                    • David B.
                      Expired
                      • July 7, 2011
                      • 88

                      #11
                      Re: '58 BW T10 Lube Procedure

                      Don, where do I need to go to learn about linkage adjustment? Thanks.

                      Dave

                      Comment

                      • David B.
                        Expired
                        • July 7, 2011
                        • 88

                        #12
                        Re: '58 BW T10 Lube Procedure

                        Cecil and Duke, thanks for the clarifications. I'm a rookie in training. :-)

                        Douglas, is the answer: "It leaks!"?

                        Dave

                        Comment

                        • Douglas C.
                          Very Frequent User
                          • August 31, 1990
                          • 384

                          #13
                          Re: '58 BW T10 Lube Procedure

                          Originally posted by David Berry (53525)
                          Cecil and Duke, thanks for the clarifications. I'm a rookie in training. :-)

                          Douglas, is the answer: "It leaks!"?

                          Dave
                          Hi Dave,

                          I'll assume Muncie and T-10 internals are very similar. I remember rebuilding my Muncie in my 69 SS 396 Chevelle about 10 years ago. I thought I would be extra nice to the car so I put Valvoline 80-90 Synthetic trans fluid in. Well, I got I think about a mile down the road, heard this clunking / groaning sound, limped back home. I called the 4-speed parts dealer, told him I was sure I did everything right; syncros, individual rollers packed with grease to hold in place is assembly, etc., even did syn. fluid.

                          Whoops he said, syn. fluid does not have the cushioning effect of old style thick fluids, old transmissions have sloppy clearences, so pull it out and open it up. If will look like a box of Corn Flakes inside. He was right. That's how I know.

                          Hope this helps.

                          Doug

                          Comment

                          • David B.
                            Expired
                            • July 7, 2011
                            • 88

                            #14
                            Re: '58 BW T10 Lube Procedure

                            Forewarned is forearmed, Doug. Thanks for the heads-up. Sorry you made Corn Flakes.

                            Dave

                            Comment

                            • Dick W.
                              Former NCRS Director Region IV
                              • June 30, 1985
                              • 10483

                              #15
                              Re: '58 BW T10 Lube Procedure

                              Originally posted by Duke Williams (22045)
                              The original spec for the transmission and axle oil was Mil-L-2105. This mil-spec was cancelled some years ago and replaced with API 80W-90 GL-5.

                              There are stories on the internet about "synchornizer corrosion" from GL-5, but I have yet to see any documented evidence of synchronizer corrosion on these 50-year old transmissions, some of which might still have the original factory fill oil in them. It's amazing to me that guys believe all these stories without a shred of evidence.

                              I am aware that there is some evidence that GL-5 may cause "yellow metal" corrosion at very high temperatures - on the order of 250F or above, but it would be rare for the oil in the transmission to exceed 200F - maybe in serious road racing in hot weather. It appears that some oil marketers are hyping this issue to promote their products, but I think it's bunk!

                              GL-5 has an EP additive that is absolutely necessary for the hypoid gear set in the axle. GL-4 lacks this additive and GL-4 is the typical spec for modern manual transmissions and transaxles that don't contain hypoid gears. Modern Corvettes have a sort of "transaxle", but the axle and transmission parts of the unit are isolated. They each have their own oil supply - GL-5 in the axle and GL-4 in the transmission.

                              The trend toward "lighter" manual transmission oils started with new designs in the seventies. Many speced ATF, which has a SAE gear oil viscosity range of 70W-75 with a GL-4 rating. This proved inadequate in some cases, which started a trend to synthetic based 75W-90 GL-4s. Since the EP additive is only necessary for hypoid gears, it follows that GL-4 might be okay for vintage transmissions that specified Mil-L-2105, but I am aware of no long term durability tests that support this conclusion, so my recommendation is to stick with GL-5 as there may be detail internal design differences in modern transmissions that make them compatible with GL-4.

                              If you have a Positraction axle, you will also need the anti-chatter additive.

                              Duke
                              Duke, I have used 50w motor oil in manual transmissions and had quite a bit of success.
                              Dick Whittington

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              Searching...Please wait.
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                              There are no results that meet this criteria.
                              Search Result for "|||"