If you are a 2nd or 3rd Flight is that worth anything to an owner and or consumer in the future if it is not Top Flight?
NCRS Judging Awards
Collapse
X
-
-
Re: NCRS Judging Awards
It's obviously a matter of personal preference.
Top flight cars sure are purdy, but they just represent the restorer's interpretation of how Corvettes were manufactured.
My own preference is to own a solid, unrestored Corvette that might score no higher than a 2nd flight. This will be a car that is genuine and the Real Deal. As a bonus, you can drive and enjoy it with impunity. I'd pay more for such a car.
Jim- Top
Comment
-
Re: NCRS Judging Awards
The point of the judging is that it happened and is documented. I found it gives a prospective buyer a very good view of the car and that is valuable, if the car is still essentially the same as when judged. Those judging sheets have a huge amount of info about the car. I recently sold a 92 point '66, it sold for about what it would have if it were top flight, according to the dealer and buyer. But having those sheets was a real plus for the buyer. But I would say you should make the car they way you want it and enjoy it, don't obsess about top flight vs. 2nd.
Big Tanks In the High Mountains of New Mexico- Top
Comment
-
Re: NCRS Judging Awards
All Flight certificates have the same relative value after the car has left the judging field.- Top
Comment
-
Re: NCRS Judging Awards
It's obviously a matter of personal preference.
Top flight cars sure are purdy, but they just represent the restorer's interpretation of how Corvettes were manufactured.
My own preference is to own a solid, unrestored Corvette that might score no higher than a 2nd flight. This will be a car that is genuine and the Real Deal. As a bonus, you can drive and enjoy it with impunity. I'd pay more for such a car.
Jim
which are both top flight and bloomington benchmark cars mostly original and as you have stated "the real deal". I beleive there is value added to
judging a car and achieving the highest score possible. You can have genuine cars that do top flight, bowtie and bloomington benchmark. I drive my cars and definitely enjoy them. They are not for sale.Barn finds are still out there. Enjoy!- Top
Comment
-
Re: NCRS Judging Awards
My '60 is an original engine fuelie. In fact, everything except the consumables, radiator, and generator are original to the car. Last time I subjected it to the judging process, a pompous, self-proclaimed engine pad expert pronounced the engine a re-stamp. It's not.
I knew more about the accuracy of what is on my car than did this individual who was there to "validate" what I had.
My '63 is another example of a car that has all its original mechanical parts except for consumables, radiator (which is in storage), and alternator. An early car, there are a few '62-ish engine traits. The master judge who reviewed the mechanicals knew nothing that wasn't in the judging guide and wouldn't recognize the '62-ish features.
It was "deja vu all over again".
I beleive there is value added to
judging a car and achieving the highest score possible.
Jim- Top
Comment
-
Re: NCRS Judging Awards
Maybe, but only maybe.
My '60 is an original engine fuelie. In fact, everything except the consumables, radiator, and generator are original to the car. Last time I subjected it to the judging process, a pompous, self-proclaimed engine pad expert pronounced the engine a re-stamp. It's not.
I knew more about the accuracy of what is on my car than did this individual who was there to "validate" what I had.
My '63 is another example of a car that has all its original mechanical parts except for consumables, radiator (which is in storage), and alternator. An early car, there are a few '62-ish engine traits. The master judge who reviewed the mechanicals knew nothing that wasn't in the judging guide and wouldn't recognize the '62-ish features.
It was "deja vu all over again".
Um, if the vehicle is for sale, then sure, I can agree. None of my cars are for sale and, for the ones I've had judged, the process they've endured has added no detectable value and taught me nothing useful.
Jim- Top
Comment
-
Re: NCRS Judging Awards
Had I encountered judges of the same caliber when I had my own vehicles scrutinized, I'd feel differently about the worth of the process.
Jim- Top
Comment
-
Re: NCRS Judging Awards
Maybe, but only maybe.
My '60 is an original engine fuelie. In fact, everything except the consumables, radiator, and generator are original to the car. Last time I subjected it to the judging process, a pompous, self-proclaimed engine pad expert pronounced the engine a re-stamp. It's not.
JimBig Tanks In the High Mountains of New Mexico- Top
Comment
-
Re: NCRS Judging Awards
My '63 is another example of a car that has all its original mechanical parts except for consumables, radiator (which is in storage), and alternator. An early car, there are a few '62-ish engine traits. The master judge who reviewed the mechanicals knew nothing that wasn't in the judging guide and wouldn't recognize the '62-ish features.
Jim- Top
Comment
-
Re: NCRS Judging Awards
- Top
Comment
-
Re: NCRS Judging Awards
The results of the judging at an NCRS event are just a brief moment in time. The lasting effects, however, go on for years.
Again, it's not about points. It's about accuracy, and that's what the organization was all about back in the 70's.
If an experienced "numbers judge" isn't available at an NCRS event, wouldn't it be better to just not judge the engine pad?Last edited by Michael H.; July 20, 2011, 10:19 AM.- Top
Comment
-
- Top
Comment
-
- Top
Comment
Comment