powdered rocker ball broke
Collapse
X
-
- Top
Comment
-
Re: powdered rocker ball broke
Jim- Top
Comment
-
Re: powdered rocker ball broke
i am not sure the one you are referring to would be of any advantage over the chevy PM ball pivot type as i would guess that the pivot would also be PM.- Top
Comment
-
Re: powdered rocker ball broke
The reason that the LT4 used 1.6:1 ratio rockers was because of its redesigned and much improved head design. If the gen II smallblock continued to live on in high performance Corvette applications after 1996, you can rest assured that the LT4 heads, and the high ratio rocker arms, would have eventually found their way into "lower performance" versions of the Corvette engine when hypothetical "LT6, LT7, LT8, etc" iteratations would have been developed.............
Check out the differences in the LT1 vs the LT4 heads here:
Properly ported double hump heads respond VERY well to high lift rocker arms. Additional work on the block itself, in conjunction with the head work is also necessary to make the heads deliver maximum flow.- Top
Comment
-
Re: powdered rocker ball broke
just adding 1.6 rockers to a SBC is no guarantee it will make more power as there have been several magazine articles where adding the 1.6 rockers caused valve float to come in earlier than with the 1.5 rockers on the same cam.- Top
Comment
-
Re: powdered rocker ball broke
Not yet, still putting the engine back in the car. Have to load up for Portland race on monday. One trick being used is to utilize Ford rocker balls which are larger and have more surface area. They have to be lapped into the base of a Chevy rocker. This all gets pretty silly for vintage racing. One of the problems with the ball system is that it doesn't locate the rocker arm very well so the rocker moves around and accross the valve tip. Even with adjustable pushrod guides. I think the Ford barrel system does a better job of locating the rocker arm.- Top
Comment
-
Re: powdered rocker ball broke
Not yet, still putting the engine back in the car. Have to load up for Portland race on monday. One trick being used is to utilize Ford rocker balls which are larger and have more surface area. They have to be lapped into the base of a Chevy rocker. This all gets pretty silly for vintage racing. One of the problems with the ball system is that it doesn't locate the rocker arm very well so the rocker moves around and accross the valve tip. Even with adjustable pushrod guides. I think the Ford barrel system does a better job of locating the rocker arm.- Top
Comment
-
Re: powdered rocker ball broke
Same argument holds true for any engine. Even MORE true for the Mark IV series engines with their feeble valvetrains! Adding 1.8 rockers to a BBC is a fatal mistake in many instances.- Top
Comment
-
Re: powdered rocker ball broke
That is VERY true....................but who said that adding 1.6 rockers guarantees more power?
Same argument holds true for any engine. Even MORE true for the Mark IV series engines with their feeble valvetrains! Adding 1.8 rockers to a BBC is a fatal mistake in many instances.Last edited by Clem Z.; June 30, 2011, 03:51 PM.- Top
Comment
-
Re: powdered rocker ball broke
All------
I have some NOS GM #3744340 rocker balls. This part number dates back to about 1957 and was discontinued from SERVICE in June, 1994. After inspecting these carefully, I'm virtually certain that they are manufactured from powder metal.In Appreciation of John Hinckley- Top
Comment
-
Re: powdered rocker ball broke
i think the one that broke for jerry was just a defective ones as i was pretty sure they were PM for a long time.- Top
Comment
Comment