FI injection mixture problem? - NCRS Discussion Boards

FI injection mixture problem?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mike R.
    Expired
    • August 30, 2009
    • 321

    FI injection mixture problem?

    The following data is from a second gear acceleration with my LM2 dual channel O2 monitor. At first AFR stays relatively constant in the low 12s. Then at about 4000rpm it starts to climb to the mid 13s then remains constant from 5500rpm onward. The ambient pressure at our elevation (~2100') with the car not running was -3.6 inHg. The car seems to run fine but clearly there is room for improvement. The car is a early 1965 (sn 3702) and has "W" nozzles. The only known deviation from stock are thicker head gaskets (roughly .040").

    If it is not possible to get the AFR to be more consistant, then should I target it for the mid rpm range or the upper?

    Thanks for any constructive commentary.

    Mike

    tim(sec) (AFR) (AFR) (RPM) (inHga)
    207.91296 11.63 11.41 1410 -3.9
    207.99488 11.91 11.54 1430 -3.7
    208.07680 12.17 11.80 1440 -3.6
    208.15872 12.19 11.88 1470 -3.0
    208.24064 12.32 11.92 1500 -2.5
    208.32256 12.49 12.05 1530 -3.1
    208.40448 12.44 12.07 1560 -3.7
    208.48640 11.85 12.19 1600 -3.5
    208.56832 12.64 12.29 1630 -3.4
    208.65024 12.58 12.14 1660 -3.4
    208.73216 12.52 12.19 1690 -3.5
    208.81408 12.77 12.17 1730 -3.7
    208.89600 12.44 12.11 1760 -3.9
    208.97792 12.29 12.16 1790 -3.8
    209.05984 12.30 12.17 1820 -3.7
    209.14176 12.26 12.13 1860 -3.6
    209.22368 12.19 12.11 1890 -3.6
    209.30560 11.98 12.04 1930 -3.8
    209.38752 12.08 12.00 1960 -4.0
    209.46944 11.92 11.89 2000 -3.6
    209.55136 11.92 11.89 2030 -3.2
    209.63328 12.08 11.83 2070 -3.9
    209.71520 11.94 11.86 2100 -4.7
    209.79712 12.01 11.88 2140 -4.4
    209.87904 11.91 11.91 2180 -4.1
    209.96096 12.05 11.89 2220 -3.9
    210.04288 12.07 11.98 2260 -3.6
    210.12480 12.19 11.80 2300 -3.8
    210.20672 12.19 11.89 2330 -4.0
    210.28864 12.08 11.98 2370 -3.5
    210.37056 12.07 11.77 2400 -3.0
    210.45248 12.00 11.88 2440 -3.1
    210.53440 11.97 11.83 2480 -3.2
    210.61632 12.07 11.76 2520 -3.4
    210.69824 12.01 11.91 2550 -3.8
    210.78016 12.08 11.88 2590 4.2
    210.86208 12.05 11.88 2630 12.2
    210.94400 11.92 11.86 2670 4.2
    211.02592 12.05 11.89 2700 -3.8
    211.10784 12.01 11.97 2740 -4.0
    211.18976 12.14 11.98 2780 -4.3
    211.27168 12.08 12.01 2820 -3.6
    211.35360 12.14 12.04 2860 -2.9
    211.43552 12.22 12.05 2900 -3.2
    211.51744 12.26 12.05 2940 -3.5
    211.59936 12.10 11.98 2980 -3.6
    211.68128 12.13 12.27 3020 -3.7
    211.76320 12.14 12.05 3060 -3.7
    211.84512 12.11 11.92 3090 -3.7
    211.92704 12.10 11.98 3130 -3.8
    212.00896 12.07 12.02 3170 -3.9
    212.09088 11.55 12.02 3210 -3.8
    212.17280 12.10 12.01 3250 -3.6
    212.25472 12.14 12.02 3290 -4.0
    212.33664 12.07 12.05 3330 -4.5
    212.41856 12.10 12.05 3370 -4.2
    212.50048 11.97 12.05 3400 -4.0
    212.58240 12.02 11.95 3440 -4.0
    212.66432 11.66 12.33 3480 -4.1
    212.74624 12.07 12.11 3520 -4.3
    212.82816 12.10 12.08 3560 -4.6
    212.91008 12.02 12.22 3600 -4.1
    212.99200 12.36 12.14 3630 -3.7
    213.07392 12.11 12.23 3670 -3.8
    213.15584 12.08 12.10 3710 -3.9
    213.23776 11.75 12.05 3750 -3.5
    213.31968 12.10 12.04 3790 -3.2
    213.40160 12.02 12.07 3830 -3.7
    213.48352 12.14 12.08 3860 -4.1
    213.56544 12.08 12.08 3900 -4.3
    213.64736 12.04 12.07 3940 -4.6
    213.72928 12.19 12.08 3980 -4.5
    213.81120 12.16 11.77 4020 -4.5
    213.89312 12.11 12.02 4060 -4.5
    213.97504 12.30 12.16 4090 -4.5
    214.05696 12.11 12.44 4130 -4.5
    214.13888 12.98 12.29 4170 -4.5
    214.22080 12.36 12.29 4210 -4.8
    214.30272 12.45 12.38 4250 -5.3
    214.38464 12.57 12.41 4290 -5.1
    214.46656 12.27 12.49 4330 -4.9
    214.54848 12.08 12.60 4370 -4.5
    214.63040 12.52 12.58 4410 -4.1
    214.71232 12.76 12.63 4450 -4.0
    214.79424 12.30 12.61 4490 -4.0
    214.87616 12.82 12.67 4530 6.1
    214.95808 12.79 12.72 4570 16.1
    215.04000 12.85 12.73 4610 6.1
    215.12192 12.92 12.82 4650 -3.9
    215.20384 12.92 12.44 4690 -4.5
    215.28576 13.04 12.88 4720 -5.0
    215.36768 12.94 12.80 4770 -4.8
    215.44960 12.94 12.91 4810 -4.7
    215.53152 12.95 12.94 4850 -5.0
    215.61344 13.01 12.89 4890 -5.4
    215.69536 12.97 12.97 4930 -4.7
    215.77728 12.85 13.07 4960 -4.2
    215.85920 13.08 12.99 5000 -4.0
    215.94112 13.07 13.05 5030 -3.9
    216.02304 12.97 13.01 5070 -5.6
    216.10496 13.08 12.91 5110 -7.4
    216.18688 12.99 13.04 5150 -5.2
    216.26880 13.04 12.99 5180 -3.0
    216.35072 13.05 13.05 5220 -3.5
    216.43264 13.01 12.95 5260 -4.1
    216.51456 12.88 12.83 5290 -4.3
    216.59648 12.99 12.86 5320 -4.5
    216.67840 13.05 12.98 5360 -4.6
    216.76032 13.16 13.01 5390 -4.7
    216.84224 13.16 12.83 5430 -4.2
    216.92416 13.16 13.13 5460 -3.8
    217.00608 13.29 12.98 5500 -5.4
    217.08800 13.55 13.13 5530 -6.9
    217.16992 13.27 13.39 5570 -6.1
    217.25184 13.33 13.33 5600 -5.4
    217.33376 13.26 12.95 5630 -6.1
    217.41568 13.32 13.22 5660 -6.8
    217.49760 13.30 13.16 5700 -6.1
    217.57952 13.42 13.36 5730 -5.3
    217.66144 13.39 12.91 5760 -5.8
    217.74336 13.63 13.20 5790 -6.3
    217.82528 13.29 12.92 5830 -5.6
    217.90720 13.35 13.10 5860 -5.0
    217.98912 13.23 13.20 5890 -5.4
    218.07104 13.44 12.99 5920 -5.7
    218.15296 13.39 13.27 5950 -6.1
    218.23488 13.44 13.24 5980 -6.4
    218.31680 13.45 13.24 6010 -6.1
    218.39872 13.36 13.23 6040 -5.8
    218.48064 13.35 13.22 6070 -5.6
    218.56256 13.24 13.22 6100 -5.5
    218.64448 13.20 13.05 6130 -6.0
    218.72640 13.38 13.19 6160 -6.4
    218.80832 13.36 13.13 6190 -5.6
    218.89024 13.05 12.92 6220 -4.8
    218.97216 13.38 13.10 6250 -4.1
    219.05408 13.41 13.13 6270 -3.4
    219.13600 13.45 13.26 6300 -4.9
    219.21792 13.48 13.22 6320 -6.4
    219.29984 13.29 13.10 6350 -6.3
    219.38176 13.16 12.79 6380 -6.3
    219.46368 12.77 12.52 6410 -6.4
    219.54560 13.35 12.99 6440 -6.5
    219.62752 13.73 13.08 6460 -4.5
    219.70944 13.48 13.07 6480 -2.5
    219.79136 13.24 12.99 6510 6.2
    219.87328 12.88 12.36 6540 15.0
    219.95520 13.57 12.77 6560 4.5
    220.03712 12.94 13.02 6580 -6.1
    220.11904 12.58 12.27 6610 -11.1
    220.20096 12.94 12.45 6630 -16.0
    220.28288 13.10 12.60 6610 -20.9
    220.36480 15.48 14.66 6580 -25.8
    220.44672 16.88 16.54 6550 -26.1
    220.52864 16.49 16.71 6520 -26.3
    220.61056 13.44 13.74 6500 -26.1
    220.69248 11.97 12.26 6480 -26.0
    220.77440 11.17 11.48 6450 -26.1
    220.85632 10.79 11.05 6420 -26.3
    220.93824 10.55 10.73 6390 -26.4
    221.02016 10.11 10.63 6360 -26.5
    221.10208 10.28 10.55 6320 -26.2
    221.18400 10.26 10.45 6280 -26.0
    221.26592 10.22 10.41 6230 -26.2
    221.34784 10.23 10.39 6180 -26.6
    221.42976 10.20 10.38 6140 -26.7
    221.51168 10.13 10.26 6090 -26.8
    221.59360 10.26 10.42 6040 -26.5
    221.67552 10.14 10.41 5980 -26.2
    221.75744 10.17 9.94 5920 -26.0
    221.83936 10.22 10.48 5860 -25.7
    221.92128 10.30 10.45 5810 -26.1
    222.00320 10.32 10.47 5750 -26.4
    222.08512 10.32 10.50 5700 -26.6
    222.16704 10.25 10.60 5640 -26.8
    222.24896 10.30 10.53 5590 -26.7
    222.33088 10.38 10.58 5540 -26.5
    222.41280 10.29 10.67 5490 -26.6
  • Richard G.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • July 31, 1984
    • 1715

    #2
    Re: FI injection mixture problem?

    I have graphed the air fuel ratios in excel.
    See if it makes it any easier to understand.
    Rick
    Attached Files

    Comment

    • Mike R.
      Expired
      • August 30, 2009
      • 321

      #3
      Re: FI injection mixture problem?

      Thanks Richard. I have it in Innovate's Logworks graph format but coverted to tabular because most people won't have Logworks and I wasn't smart enough to do it in Excel

      Mike

      Originally posted by Richard Geier (7745)
      I have graphed the air fuel ratios in excel.
      See if it makes it any easier to understand.
      Rick

      Comment

      • Joe C.
        Expired
        • August 31, 1999
        • 4598

        #4
        Re: FI injection mixture problem?

        WOT A/F ratio for maximum power should be between 12.5:1 and 13.0:1. Your numbers look very good!

        Comment

        • Mike R.
          Expired
          • August 30, 2009
          • 321

          #5
          Re: FI injection mixture problem?

          Thanks for weighing in. The displayed data is about as good as I can get in the current condition. What is not apparant in the excel graph is that the mixture first gets richer then leaner. This occurs on both sides but somewhat less on one than the other. All this is easier to see in the expanded graph in Logworks. The question is why it first gets leaner then richer. One possibility is an intermitant ignition miss. The problem with this idea is that it is occuring on both sides but less on one than the other. My understanding is that the K66 TI system pretty much either works or not.

          Mike

          Originally posted by Joe Ciaravino (32899)
          WOT A/F ratio for maximum power should be between 12.5:1 and 13.0:1. Your numbers look very good!

          Comment

          • Richard G.
            Extremely Frequent Poster
            • July 31, 1984
            • 1715

            #6
            Re: FI injection mixture problem?

            I love to see modern techniques used on the old motors. I am always wondering where we were in terms of emissions and power levels and in this case A/F mixtures. Especially before the feedback loops and computers. I would like to see this same data on a 365 HP motor. How much difference did the injection make? Thanks
            Rick

            Comment

            • Joe C.
              Expired
              • August 31, 1999
              • 4598

              #7
              Re: FI injection mixture problem?

              Originally posted by Mike Rapoport (50767)
              Thanks for weighing in. The displayed data is about as good as I can get in the current condition. What is not apparant in the excel graph is that the mixture first gets richer then leaner. This occurs on both sides but somewhat less on one than the other. All this is easier to see in the expanded graph in Logworks. The question is why it first gets leaner then richer. One possibility is an intermitant ignition miss. The problem with this idea is that it is occuring on both sides but less on one than the other. My understanding is that the K66 TI system pretty much either works or not.

              Mike
              Oh, yes it is. Throw out those first few lines of data, as the wideband has to stabilize for the first couple seconds. After doing so, you have a perfectly acceptable dataset showing (about)12.5:1 @ 1750, slowly climbing to (about) 13.2 @ 6400. The only anomaly that I see is that last dropoff and erratic section between 6400 and 6600, when you got out of the throttle.

              This area might be explained away as a misfire, as you said, but as you might already know, an intermittent misfire will often show up as a LEAN, that's right, lean condition rather than as rich. Why? Because the wideband O2 sensor is not actually measuring air-fuel ratio, per se. What it IS measuring is oxygen content of the exhaust stream. If you have intermittent misfire, you will have a higher concentration of free oxygen molecules in the exhaust stream. Guess what the O2 sensor thinks about that?

              I am not familiar with the Rochester fuel unit, so can only speculate on this last 200 RPM worth of data. Try posting your question here:



              although I doubt whether anybody there is familiar with much more than EFI systems. It's worth a try.

              One more thought: as you increase RPM @ WOT (WOT implies maximum possible VE for ambient conditions), the maximum cylinder pressures increase, making the charge somewhat harder to ignite. Getting back to the misfire theory: are you working with a fresh set of spark plugs? If the answer is YES, then try short gapping them at .025" instead of .035", as a one shot deal.........a test which will remove misfire due to insufficient voltage from the equation. Do not run the engine for very long like this, because you will foul plugs under normal driving conditions.
              Last edited by Joe C.; October 9, 2010, 05:18 PM.

              Comment

              • Mike R.
                Expired
                • August 30, 2009
                • 321

                #8
                Re: FI injection mixture problem?

                I realize that failure to ignite shows up as lean. I decided to start my winter corvette projects today. I pulled the trans and will be removing the engine this week for some head work and to see what I have for connecting rods.

                I recall that the highest cylinder pressures occur at the torque peak and not the HP peak. I suspect that if there is a misfire it is a defect in the TI module or coil. I actually bought some new plugs yesterday to see if it made a difference but didn't try them

                Originally posted by Joe Ciaravino (32899)
                Oh, yes it is. Throw out those first few lines of data, as the wideband has to stabilize for the first couple seconds. After doing so, you have a perfectly acceptable dataset showing (about)12.5:1 @ 1750, slowly climbing to (about) 13.2 @ 6400. The only anomaly that I see is that last dropoff and erratic section between 6400 and 6600, when you got out of the throttle.

                This area might be explained away as a misfire, as you said, but as you might already know, an intermittent misfire will often show up as a LEAN, that's right, lean condition rather than as rich. Why? Because the wideband O2 sensor is not actually measuring air-fuel ratio, per se. What it IS measuring is oxygen content of the exhaust stream. If you have intermittent misfire, you will have a higher concentration of free oxygen molecules in the exhaust stream. Guess what the O2 sensor thinks about that?

                I am not familiar with the Rochester fuel unit, so can only speculate on this last 200 RPM worth of data. Try posting your question here:



                although I doubt whether anybody there is familiar with much more than EFI systems. It's worth a try.

                One more thought: as you increase RPM @ WOT (WOT implies maximum possible VE for ambient conditions), the maximum cylinder pressures increase, making the charge somewhat harder to ignite. Getting back to the misfire theory: are you working with a fresh set of spark plugs? If the answer is YES, then try short gapping them at .025" instead of .035", as a one shot deal.........a test which will remove misfire due to insufficient voltage from the equation. Do not run the engine for very long like this, because you will foul plugs under normal driving conditions.

                Comment

                • G B.
                  Expired
                  • November 30, 1974
                  • 1407

                  #9
                  Re: FI injection mixture problem?

                  I've been calibrating Rochester FI units on a Dyno-Jet chassis dynamometer for the last couple of years. I have print-outs from all those runs.

                  If you're interested in my comments about your results, you're welcome to call me at (251) 478-4003 between 8 am and 9 pm Central time.
                  Last edited by G B.; October 10, 2010, 08:03 AM.

                  Comment

                  • Dick W.
                    Former NCRS Director Region IV
                    • June 30, 1985
                    • 10483

                    #10
                    Re: FI injection mixture problem?

                    Mike, you have an offer from the expert, Jerry Bramlett, take him up and call him. He is recognized as one of the premier experts on FI
                    Dick Whittington

                    Comment

                    • Mike R.
                      Expired
                      • August 30, 2009
                      • 321

                      #11
                      Re: FI injection mixture problem?

                      I agree and it was great to talk to Jerry. I learned a lot. It is always useful when working on vintage mechanical devices to know what is typical and also the limit of what is achievable. After talking to Jerry, I realize that my fuel curve is fairly typical but could be improved somewhat. We always want everything to work as well as possible and we need to know what is possible or we will never get to drive our cars. Even on modern EFI engines AFR vacillates between two points defined by the narrow band O2 sensors.

                      I also learned some more details about the system and have concluded that some very clever people worked at Rochester 50yrs ago!

                      I'm off to disassemble my M21 which doesn't like downshifting into second...its easy to see why the synchro sleeve does not want to engage the worn tips on the synchro ring...something I can remedy today

                      Mike


                      Originally posted by Dick Whittington (8804)
                      Mike, you have an offer from the expert, Jerry Bramlett, take him up and call him. He is recognized as one of the premier experts on FI

                      Comment

                      • Jerry G.
                        Extremely Frequent Poster
                        • March 31, 1985
                        • 1022

                        #12
                        Re: FI injection mixture problem?

                        Originally posted by Richard Geier (7745)
                        I have graphed the air fuel ratios in excel.
                        See if it makes it any easier to understand.
                        Rick
                        Did you take data from both the right and left exhaust pipes? I have found a significant difference in side to side. I haven't found the reason yet. It's probably a problem in the spider or on nozzle.

                        Comment

                        • Mike R.
                          Expired
                          • August 30, 2009
                          • 321

                          #13
                          Re: FI injection mixture problem?

                          Yes and both sides are pretty close and follow the same pattern.

                          Mike

                          Originally posted by Jerry Gollnick (8575)
                          Did you take data from both the right and left exhaust pipes? I have found a significant difference in side to side. I haven't found the reason yet. It's probably a problem in the spider or on nozzle.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          Searching...Please wait.
                          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                          An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                          There are no results that meet this criteria.
                          Search Result for "|||"