Re: 1961 No Heater- Delivered with Anti-Freeze?
FWIW, I don' see the reason why GM would deviate from a singular procedure for this issue.
It doesn't require a very low ambient temperature to crack a block.
It would seem that GM would not consider the delivery location to vary procedure. I recall the "Root Beer" Regional in Old Town a few years ago when the Temp dropped to below freezing. As for California, many people live in and weekend in the mountains. Plus, we all know how much and how quickly these cars got around the country.
Perhaps most importantly, there were no comments regarding the capacity of the anti-freeze used also having a higher boiling point than water, which safeguards againts boil-overs in a warmer clime.
Here I go being logical again, which has no relationship to GM or Corvettes, but, it would seem that the inclusion of some anti-freeze would be a standard procedure for all units produced.
The $5.00 charge looks to be a "Dealer Incentive" ie: incremental income.
HaND
FWIW, I don' see the reason why GM would deviate from a singular procedure for this issue.
It doesn't require a very low ambient temperature to crack a block.
It would seem that GM would not consider the delivery location to vary procedure. I recall the "Root Beer" Regional in Old Town a few years ago when the Temp dropped to below freezing. As for California, many people live in and weekend in the mountains. Plus, we all know how much and how quickly these cars got around the country.
Perhaps most importantly, there were no comments regarding the capacity of the anti-freeze used also having a higher boiling point than water, which safeguards againts boil-overs in a warmer clime.
Here I go being logical again, which has no relationship to GM or Corvettes, but, it would seem that the inclusion of some anti-freeze would be a standard procedure for all units produced.
The $5.00 charge looks to be a "Dealer Incentive" ie: incremental income.
HaND
Comment