Gary
Thanks for real world application. Personally, I feel "judges knowledge" should work in favor of an owner.
How is an owner going to restore their car? Going to use criteria in applicable TIMJG, that's how. As a judge, if you "know" something not in the book - write that owner a note with no deductions. Don't penalize an owner for something TIMJG authors didn't think was real or didn't think was important.
Flip side, if "judges knowledge" has TIMJG in error, and owner restored to book, no deduction - write a note.
Judging should help owner - write a note on this "judges knowledge" stuff.
Rant from peanut gallery! YMMV
Dave
Thanks for real world application. Personally, I feel "judges knowledge" should work in favor of an owner.
How is an owner going to restore their car? Going to use criteria in applicable TIMJG, that's how. As a judge, if you "know" something not in the book - write that owner a note with no deductions. Don't penalize an owner for something TIMJG authors didn't think was real or didn't think was important.
Flip side, if "judges knowledge" has TIMJG in error, and owner restored to book, no deduction - write a note.
Judging should help owner - write a note on this "judges knowledge" stuff.
Rant from peanut gallery! YMMV
Dave
Comment