terminal part number needed - NCRS Discussion Boards

terminal part number needed

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jeffrey S.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • May 31, 1988
    • 1882

    #16
    Re: terminal part number needed

    Originally posted by Patrick Hulst (16386)
    Nope.
    Pic borrowed from random search; its a "somewhat" accurate repro.


    [ATTACH=CONFIG]102940[/ATTACH]
    Patrick,
    I haven't looked at the one on my '69 lately (it's well hidden behind the shield) but if I remember correctly it is a 90 degree fitting. Also, the fabric insulation on most repros and what is available in bulk is larger than original. There is a fabric the right size from Naragansit (sp) and my guess is that the Dr. has the right size.
    Jeff

    Comment

    • Richard M.
      Super Moderator
      • August 31, 1988
      • 11323

      #17
      Re: terminal part number needed

      AAhh ok thanks.

      I goofed up.... I was tinkering on stuff and found a old 67 engine harness. I actually recovered and restored that terminal I pictured. I like mini-part challenges. I've done silly stuff like this many times as I'm impatient and would rather fix what I have sometimes.

      I was going to mail it to Mark. BTW, this original terminal was both crimped and soldered.

      I'd think Mark you could do the same if you can't get one easily..... But I see Ken just offered. Nice.

      1208201023a_resized.jpg1208201024_resized.jpg1208201049_resized.jpg1208201056b_resized.jpg1208201106_resized.jpg1208201110_resized.jpg1208201114_resized.jpg1208201123a_resized.jpg1208201123b_resized.jpg1208201124_resized.jpg

      Comment

      • Joe L.
        Beyond Control Poster
        • February 1, 1988
        • 43219

        #18
        Re: terminal part number needed

        Originally posted by Jeffrey Salz (13182)
        Patrick,
        I haven't looked at the one on my '69 lately (it's well hidden behind the shield) but if I remember correctly it is a 90 degree fitting. Also, the fabric insulation on most repros and what is available in bulk is larger than original. There is a fabric the right size from Naragansit (sp) and my guess is that the Dr. has the right size.
        Jeff

        Jeff------

        1968-71 Corvettes used a temp sender with a pin type terminal. The connector was similar to the one shown in Patrick's post. C2 and 1972+ C3 used a blade type terminal with a connector the style shown in Rich's post.

        The pin terminal temp senders were discontinued many years ago and replaced by the blade terminal senders. Of course, this requires a change in the connector for 1968-71 Corvettes. If yours currently has a blade terminal sender and connector, then I'd say yours has been replaced somewhere along the way.
        In Appreciation of John Hinckley

        Comment

        • Mark G.
          Very Frequent User
          • January 31, 2007
          • 177

          #19
          Re: terminal part number needed

          Originally posted by Patrick Hulst (16386)
          Nope.
          Pic borrowed from random search; its a "somewhat" accurate repro.


          [ATTACH=CONFIG]102940[/ATTACH]
          This is what I have, not a female spade terminal. This would be the terminal I need the part number for. Thanks to all for your replies, ideas, and suggestions.
          Mark

          Comment

          • Tom E.
            Very Frequent User
            • June 1, 2019
            • 448

            #20
            Re: terminal part number needed

            Late to the party for this repair but if anyone is interested here is a site that sell a fair amount of type 56 connectors

            Theelectricaldepot.com stocks professional grade electrical supplies. Items like Automotive Wiring, Starter Cable, Electrical Terminals and Connectors, Circuit Breakers, Fuses, Cable Ties, Wiring Loom, Relays, Tape, Battery Terminals and Accessories for a wide variety of applications.


            Tom

            Comment

            • Jeffrey S.
              Extremely Frequent Poster
              • May 31, 1988
              • 1882

              #21
              Re: terminal part number needed

              Originally posted by Joe Lucia (12484)
              Jeff------

              1968-71 Corvettes used a temp sender with a pin type terminal. The connector was similar to the one shown in Patrick's post. C2 and 1972+ C3 used a blade type terminal with a connector the style shown in Rich's post.

              The pin terminal temp senders were discontinued many years ago and replaced by the blade terminal senders. Of course, this requires a change in the connector for 1968-71 Corvettes. If yours currently has a blade terminal sender and connector, then I'd say yours has been replaced somewhere along the way.
              Joe,
              Thanks for the response. My car still has the original pin terminal and connector. As I said, it has been a long time since I looked at the wire/connector and I remember it as being a 90 degree but maybe I'm just thinking of something else. I do know that the sender is the pin type and I have another as a spare.
              Jeff

              Comment

              • Mark G.
                Very Frequent User
                • January 31, 2007
                • 177

                #22
                Re: terminal part number needed

                Originally posted by Ken Anderson (10232)
                If you can't find just 1, then PM & I'll fix you up with the right stuff.
                Thanks Ken. PM sent

                Comment

                • Richard T.
                  Very Frequent User
                  • February 1, 1979
                  • 858

                  #23
                  Re: terminal part number needed

                  pushed the insulation up a few inches, cut, spliced,soldered, and heat shrunk connection. Original insulation covers the splice.

                  Comment

                  • Mark G.
                    Very Frequent User
                    • January 31, 2007
                    • 177

                    #24
                    Re: terminal part number needed

                    here is a picture of the terminal. Notice it is oval and not round. Wonder why GM did that?coolant temp sender terminal.jpg

                    Comment

                    • James G.
                      Very Frequent User
                      • August 22, 2018
                      • 800

                      #25
                      Re: terminal part number needed

                      When attempting to spread apart and re-use original terminals I have found it necessary to ANNEAL the terminals prior to attempting to re-crimp them so that the brass doesn't crack or outright break, I have had them crack when trying to remove from a wire so I began annealing them prior to removal from an old harness.

                      Great tip on using a drill to remove the wires!!!

                      FWIW here is another source on packard terminals and crimpers.
                      James A Groome
                      1971 LT1 11130 - https://photos.app.goo.gl/zSoFz24JMPXw5Ffi9 - the black LT1
                      1971 LT1 21783 - 3 STAR Preservation.- https://photos.app.goo.gl/wMRDJgmyDyAwc9Nh8 - Brandshatch Green LT1
                      My first gen Camaro research http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.p...owposts;u=4337
                      Posts on Yenko boards... https://www.yenko.net/forum/search.php?searchid=826453

                      Comment

                      • Gary B.
                        Extremely Frequent Poster
                        • February 1, 1997
                        • 7018

                        #26
                        Re: terminal part number needed

                        James,

                        What is your process for annealing the terminals?

                        Gary

                        Comment

                        • Joe L.
                          Beyond Control Poster
                          • February 1, 1988
                          • 43219

                          #27
                          Re: terminal part number needed

                          Originally posted by Mark Giusti (46866)
                          here is a picture of the terminal. Notice it is oval and not round. Wonder why GM did that?[ATTACH=CONFIG]103076[/ATTACH]

                          Mark------


                          I do not recall the original 1968-71 GM temp sender connector as being "oval" shaped. I recall it as being round. The insulator which surrounded the connector was sort of oval shaped, though. The terminal on the temp sender was definitely round and definitely not oval shaped.
                          In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                          Comment

                          • Joe L.
                            Beyond Control Poster
                            • February 1, 1988
                            • 43219

                            #28
                            Re: terminal part number needed

                            Originally posted by Joe Lucia (12484)
                            Jeff------

                            1968-71 Corvettes used a temp sender with a pin type terminal. The connector was similar to the one shown in Patrick's post. C2 and 1972+ C3 used a blade type terminal with a connector the style shown in Rich's post.

                            The pin terminal temp senders were discontinued many years ago and replaced by the blade terminal senders. Of course, this requires a change in the connector for 1968-71 Corvettes. If yours currently has a blade terminal sender and connector, then I'd say yours has been replaced somewhere along the way.

                            I need to make an important correction to this post. Specifically, the temp sender for C2 Corvettes and 72-78 Corvettes DID NOT have a blade type terminal. Those temp senders had a BUTTON-TYPE terminal. These senders did use the type connector as depicted in Rich Mozzetta's post #17, above.

                            Corvettes did not get a blade terminal type sender until the 1979 model year.

                            With a BUTTON TYPE terminal sender, the connector attaches at a 90 degree angle. With a BLADE TYPE terminal sender, the connector attaches "straight on"
                            In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                            Comment

                            • James G.
                              Very Frequent User
                              • August 22, 2018
                              • 800

                              #29
                              Re: terminal part number needed

                              I just use a small torch and heat it up - it is annealed when the color changes, you can tell when it changes.
                              James A Groome
                              1971 LT1 11130 - https://photos.app.goo.gl/zSoFz24JMPXw5Ffi9 - the black LT1
                              1971 LT1 21783 - 3 STAR Preservation.- https://photos.app.goo.gl/wMRDJgmyDyAwc9Nh8 - Brandshatch Green LT1
                              My first gen Camaro research http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.p...owposts;u=4337
                              Posts on Yenko boards... https://www.yenko.net/forum/search.php?searchid=826453

                              Comment

                              • Gary B.
                                Extremely Frequent Poster
                                • February 1, 1997
                                • 7018

                                #30
                                Re: terminal part number needed

                                James,

                                Heat it up until red? Or is there some more subtle color change that occurs at a lower temperature, prior to getting it red hot?

                                Gary

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                Searching...Please wait.
                                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                                An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                                There are no results that meet this criteria.
                                Search Result for "|||"