"Another" 1964 Trim Tag Anomaly?

[Stephen S.]

Thanks for your time in advance!

I am the 2nd owner of '64 convertible since 1998. I've just recently got around to restoring this car and I have somewhat of a mystery on my hands. I purchased the car from the widow of the original owner. She was elderly, but they had kept many records over years, including old registration cards, receipts for A/C recharging, the Powerglide rebuilds, etc. She is now deceased also, but I have been in contact with their only child, who has forwarded me period family pics, etc.

Where my question lies in the trim tag. The serial number plate matches the block, SL coded as a 300HP, A/C, Powerglide. The markings on the transmission match the warranty docs from 1977 rebuild. Axle date checks out, so does the tinted glass, and everything else I've ID'ed so far.

According to the Noland Adams index... the Blue Leather option didn't come with the SL engine config. The KA Suffix = "base model" which I assume is the 250HP. As of late March, the codes changed... but mine is a 2/26/64 build. The daughter, who was just 5 at the time of purchase, relayed an oral history that "Dad ordered the car for Mom for their anniversary". Could specific cars be configured and "ordered" at the time? What happened to the trim tag in those cases?

40867 S 112039
F26
64867
898KA
S6889
912AA

300HP, PGlide, PS, PB, A/C, 3:36 to 1, Silver Blue, Blue Leather, Full Tinted

Any thoughts would be appreciated!

Steve

[Don H.]

Re: "Another" 1964 Trim Tag Anomaly?

Stephen
most likely the ECL code is in error and should actually read KB for Conv that includes M35 PG and excludes A31 PW. Trim tag ECLs went berzerk in 1964 what with all the Trim variations that were available, and with the introduction of Dow-Smith bodies. There are many Trim tag errors documented on 64 cars. My Jan 24 build 64 FI A31 PW coupe has ECL code BA whereas it should read BD as one example. So yes, I would say you have a very nice 64 convertible with a Trim tag anomaly. Welcome to NCRS and the TDB!

[Michael J.]

Re: "Another" 1964 Trim Tag Anomaly?

I agree with Don, but if you look at the '63-'64 TIM&JG, it shows 898KA as an acceptable blue leather interior convertible code. which is acceptable on a silver blue exterior, 912AA, convertible. So no issue there.

[Stephen S.]

Re: "Another" 1964 Trim Tag Anomaly?

Thanks Don and Michael for the prompt, informative responses. I know this is going to be a journey... but an enjoyable one! I look forward to participating in the forum on a regular basis.