My First Post-3877459 Transmission Tag - NCRS Discussion Boards

My First Post-3877459 Transmission Tag

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • George O.
    Expired
    • August 22, 2017
    • 21

    My First Post-3877459 Transmission Tag

    I am about to purchase my very first Corvette, a 1966 427/425 HP Convertible. I am not an expert and have spent hours trying to research the car. The engine and transmission are supposedly original (yeah, I know). I assume that it's an M20 or M21 based on the 3885010, 3857584, 3884685 casting numbers. My problem is the 3877459 transmission tag. After 2 1/2 hours of research, it appears that tag number is for a '66 Chevelle. Can someone here offer some guidance? And yes, I am meeting with an appraiser at the car prior to purchase; I just want to be as knowledgeable as possible prior to inspecting the car. Also, how much would this hurt the value of the car if it isn't original?
    Last edited by George O.; August 24, 2017, 04:33 PM. Reason: Correct my assumption of M20
  • Keith W.
    Very Frequent User
    • June 30, 1998
    • 375

    #2
    Re: My First Post-3877459 Transmission Tag

    George - found this ref 3877459 - hope you can paste the link in - not sure if there's a way to ID a transmission as trans tags could easily be changed , just a thought ?

    Comment

    • Leif A.
      Extremely Frequent Poster
      • August 31, 1997
      • 3611

      #3
      Re: My First Post-3877459 Transmission Tag

      George,
      Welcome to one of the most informative Corvette Forums. In 1966 the big block Corvette only came from the factory with the M21 close ratio transmission and the tag number would have been 3880855. As far as I know, both the M20 and the M21 had the same main transmission casting number (3885010)...the difference is in the guts. With that being said, it would depend on the condition of the rest of the car and the individual buying as to how the value would be effected. M21 transmissions are available as are the tags. Again, it depends where you want to go with the car.
      Leif
      '67 Coupe L79, M21, C60, N14, N40, J50, A31, U69, A01, QB1
      Top Flight 2017 Lone Star Regional

      Comment

      • Joe R.
        Extremely Frequent Poster
        • July 31, 1976
        • 4547

        #4
        Re: My First Post-3877459 Transmission Tag

        George,

        Welcome to the NCRS!
        The numbers for the casting is correct for a 1966 Muncie Trans. however the 425 should have an M-22 with a tag number of 3879987 or an M-21 with a tag number of 3880855. Both are close ratio transmissions. Don't tell anybody it's a M-22 and use the M-21 tag. Don't think many M-22 were in 66 425HP Corvettes.
        You can get tags from Long Island Corvette Supply 1 800 466-6367 for $25.00 Online at www.licorvette.com

        JR

        Comment

        • Jim D.
          Extremely Frequent Poster
          • June 30, 1985
          • 2883

          #5
          Re: My First Post-3877459 Transmission Tag

          Is the VIN of the car stamped on the trans.? That will determine whether or not the trans. is original to the car. Tags are easily changed and mean nothing regarding originality.

          Comment

          • George O.
            Expired
            • August 22, 2017
            • 21

            #6
            Re: My First Post-3877459 Transmission Tag

            Jim, thanks for the reply. I don't have a pic of the VIN stamp on the trans and it is back at the body shop getting a blemish repaired. I will be able to confirm that when I see it in person on the 29th.

            Comment

            • George O.
              Expired
              • August 22, 2017
              • 21

              #7
              Re: My First Post-3877459 Transmission Tag

              Thanks for the quick reply Keith. Your reference is very helpful. Based on what I just read, it appears that my assumption that it's an M20 is probably incorrect; IF the tag is correct, its an M21 which makes more sense from what the other posters have already shared.

              Comment

              • George O.
                Expired
                • August 22, 2017
                • 21

                #8
                Re: My First Post-3877459 Transmission Tag

                Thanks for the info and tag lead Joe. I'm leaning towards it being an M21 based on your info and additional research. I'm really trying to do my due diligence as I've saved 40 years for this car.

                Comment

                • Joe R.
                  Extremely Frequent Poster
                  • July 31, 1976
                  • 4547

                  #9
                  Re: My First Post-3877459 Transmission Tag

                  George,

                  Stamping the SN on the side of the transmission is not a problem. If that's all it's missing just get the tag and stamp it.

                  JR

                  Comment

                  • Jim D.
                    Extremely Frequent Poster
                    • June 30, 1985
                    • 2883

                    #10
                    Re: My First Post-3877459 Transmission Tag

                    Originally posted by Joe Ray (1011)
                    George,

                    Stamping the SN on the side of the transmission is not a problem. If that's all it's missing just get the tag and stamp it.

                    JR
                    My impression is that he's trying to verify that the car is indeed an original matching numbers car, not trying to create another fake one.

                    Comment

                    • George O.
                      Expired
                      • August 22, 2017
                      • 21

                      #11
                      Re: My First Post-3877459 Transmission Tag

                      Originally posted by Jim Durham (8797)
                      My impression is that he's trying to verify that the car is indeed an original matching numbers car, not trying to create another fake one.
                      Yes Jim, you get me. I'm just trying to figure out a baseline before I overpay.

                      Comment

                      • Donald A.
                        Expired
                        • February 28, 1987
                        • 243

                        #12
                        Re: My First Post-3877459 Transmission Tag

                        Originally posted by George OBryan (63904)
                        Yes Jim, you get me. I'm just trying to figure out a baseline before I overpay.
                        I've researched this quite a bit and can offer my opinion. Both the 3880853 and 3880855 tags are reported with '66 L72 M21s. One source suggests that these M21s were all the same, L79 or L72 etc, and the different tag numbers related to some of the drive gears for different diff ratios. In one section the AIM lists the 855 with the L72 but in the G81 posi page (sheet A1) the 853 tag shows as being used with L72 having 3.70/4.11 diff ratio. My L72 has the original driveline (in my opinion) and has a 3880853 tag which goes along with having the FB rear end (4.11 ratio). Anyway, as others have noted the tags are easily changed but the cast numbers which you have noted are helpful and the partial VIN stamped on the case along the with P (date) code certainly can help clarify (again just my opinion). Examples of my trans tag, VIN and P code stamps are in the photos below. Yes some people have faked trans cases but real 50 year old stamps have that certain patina! Good luck with your eval

                        Attached Files

                        Comment

                        • Joe R.
                          Extremely Frequent Poster
                          • July 31, 1976
                          • 4547

                          #13
                          Re: My First Post-3877459 Transmission Tag

                          Originally posted by Jim Durham (8797)
                          My impression is that he's trying to verify that the car is indeed an original matching numbers car, not trying to create another fake one.
                          What I'm trying to say is "Don't let a transmission stop you from buying an otherwise good Corvette".

                          Get it Jim? Duh!

                          JR

                          Comment

                          • George O.
                            Expired
                            • August 22, 2017
                            • 21

                            #14
                            Re: My First Post-3877459 Transmission Tag

                            JR brings up a good point Maybe rather than my just focusing on the transmission, I should get your overall opinion of the totality of the car:
                            Here's the link


                            I'll be in it for $85,000 plus shipping. Thoughts?

                            Comment

                            • Michael W.
                              Expired
                              • March 31, 1997
                              • 4290

                              #15
                              Re: My First Post-3877459 Transmission Tag

                              I see the seller uses the phrase 'numbers matching' which used to mean the original factory installed components. Today it's almost a warning that it's half decent restamps.

                              Unless values have taken a tumble, $85K is way low for a real '66 427/425.

                              I'd have a Corvette expert inspect the car if originality is important.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              Searching...Please wait.
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                              There are no results that meet this criteria.
                              Search Result for "|||"