Re: C-3 70 ls-5 distributor questions Vacuum Can
Those specs look identical to the 1115201 that was OE on many earlier engines, but never available in service or consolidated early on. That's one of the "problems" with VACs from a judging standpoint - some were never available as service parts.
As you can imagine, a 15.5" VAC is not suited to an engine that only idles at 14-15" unless it has ported vacuum advance. A 12" VAC would be more suitable with full time advance. Idle vacuum will keep it "locked" at full advance at idle. It complies with the "two-inch rule" by providing full advance at no less than 2" below typical idle vacuum.
A 15.5" VAC will not be locked at your idle vacuum. The result is that idle spark advance will be lost, which reduces idle speed/vacuum, which causes more timing loss. It's a positive feedback loop that desabilizes the idle and can cause the engine to stall.
This is how my '63 327/340 behaved until I replaced the 15.5" 201 VAC, with a 8" 236 that the 12" idle vacuum could keep locked on full advance at idle - a "design error" for sure, but one that was easy to fix once I understood the problem.
Duke
Those specs look identical to the 1115201 that was OE on many earlier engines, but never available in service or consolidated early on. That's one of the "problems" with VACs from a judging standpoint - some were never available as service parts.
As you can imagine, a 15.5" VAC is not suited to an engine that only idles at 14-15" unless it has ported vacuum advance. A 12" VAC would be more suitable with full time advance. Idle vacuum will keep it "locked" at full advance at idle. It complies with the "two-inch rule" by providing full advance at no less than 2" below typical idle vacuum.
A 15.5" VAC will not be locked at your idle vacuum. The result is that idle spark advance will be lost, which reduces idle speed/vacuum, which causes more timing loss. It's a positive feedback loop that desabilizes the idle and can cause the engine to stall.
This is how my '63 327/340 behaved until I replaced the 15.5" 201 VAC, with a 8" 236 that the 12" idle vacuum could keep locked on full advance at idle - a "design error" for sure, but one that was easy to fix once I understood the problem.
Duke
Comment