68 missing trim tag - NCRS Discussion Boards

68 missing trim tag

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kenneth B.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • August 31, 1984
    • 2087

    #16
    Re: 68 missing trim tag

    Originally posted by Roy Sinor (2608)
    Ken,Burden of proof as always is with the owner, several 1963 and up cars have been judged without trim tags all met a burden of proof confirming what they were before they were restored. The 65 mentioned previously in this thread was a theft recovery it was presented in unrestored condition and signed off by all the appropriate individuals, others without trim tags have also been judged each case is different but most were presented with original GM documentation confirming the build. Absent that type of burden of proof, you are out of luck, in the present system.
    OK I agree. I know of a 67 435 high optioned 435 conv with paperwork that was judged with no trim tag with real paperwork.
    65 350 TI CONV 67 J56 435 CONV,67,390/AIR CONV,70 454/air CONV,
    What A MAN WON'T SPEND TO GIVE HIS ASS A RIDE

    Comment

    Working...
    Searching...Please wait.
    An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

    Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
    An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

    Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
    An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
    There are no results that meet this criteria.
    Search Result for "|||"