'66 L36 Pad Stamp - NCRS Discussion Boards

'66 L36 Pad Stamp

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • William F.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • June 9, 2009
    • 1363

    '66 L36 Pad Stamp

    Would you please give opinions on this pad stamp on a "66 L36 I'm considering?
    Thanks
    Attached Files
  • Dick W.
    Former NCRS Director Region IV
    • June 30, 1985
    • 10483

    #2
    Re: '66 L36 Pad Stamp

    Originally posted by William Ford (50517)
    Would you please give opinions on this pad stamp on a "66 L36 I'm considering?
    Thanks
    Far from expert, but I see multiple issues based on the photo.
    1.Total absence of factory machine marks
    2. Machined surface is comprised of at least two surface finishes
    3. Not sure if it is just the photo, but the character width on the machine code seems too narrow
    Dick Whittington

    Comment

    • Keith B.
      Very Frequent User
      • March 7, 2008
      • 928

      #3
      Re: '66 L36 Pad Stamp

      With what Dick said it looks like someone used the same font of numbers to do both set of numbers.

      Comment

      • Richard M.
        Super Moderator
        • August 31, 1988
        • 11323

        #4
        Re: '66 L36 Pad Stamp

        Here is is for easier viewing.....

        I'm certainly no stamp pad expert, but it doesn't appear typical to me either. I agree the Assy stamp font seems too narrow. The "I"'s could be wider IMO.

        66L36.jpg

        Below is a restamp for a restoration engine on a real '67 L71 I worked on a few years ago. I think the stamper did a good job on this one.

        photo.jpg

        ....Rich

        Comment

        • Michael J.
          Extremely Frequent Poster
          • January 27, 2009
          • 7119

          #5
          Re: '66 L36 Pad Stamp

          Doesn't look right. You can easily see the grinding marks around the VIN at about a 15 degree angle to horizontal, and as Dick said, that finish is totally different than the one around the engine date/suffix.
          Big Tanks In the High Mountains of New Mexico

          Comment

          • Larry M.
            Extremely Frequent Poster
            • January 1, 1992
            • 2688

            #6
            Re: '66 L36 Pad Stamp

            Bill:

            I do not believe that the engine is factory stamped (Tonawanda engine plant and St Louis assembly line). Engine MAY be original to the car, but it has been apart and rebuilt and then stamped. I would also check the casing number and the block casting date to see how they line up with the build of the car.

            My opinion only.

            Larry

            Comment

            • William F.
              Extremely Frequent Poster
              • June 9, 2009
              • 1363

              #7
              Re: '66 L36 Pad Stamp

              Larry, et al , think you've got it pegged. I didn't say, but engine has correct casting numbers and dates and is original to car, but a previous owner had original engine rebuilt and unfortunately, decked the block; then restamped; unfortunately, didn't recreate broach marks, it seems. Present owner knows about restamping but wasn't sure if it "looked as factory." I didn't see any broach marks either, but I'm no pad expert. That being said, the car has had a frame off, good, but not NCRS perfect- would probably get 2nd flight. Mechanicals are excellent; pulls stronger than some L72's,4 speed , base/clear paint drives great, no wind noise, cold factory AC; PS ,PB, power windows, repop knockoffs, sidepipes-?original to car, all glass except windshield original, Marlboro Maroon with black interior. Owner really doesn't want to sell it-I know him- but would sell for $95K. What do ya'll think?

              Comment

              • William F.
                Extremely Frequent Poster
                • June 9, 2009
                • 1363

                #8
                Re: '66 L36 Pad Stamp

                Thanks for assesments. Put another way, how much in absolute $ do you think not having a pad stamp that "will judge" lowers the value of an otherwise good highly optioned including AC BB midyear? This particular car would probably pass all operations and would probably be high second flight as is based on some parts with incorrect dates, etc.

                Comment

                • Joe R.
                  Extremely Frequent Poster
                  • July 31, 1976
                  • 4550

                  #9
                  Re: '66 L36 Pad Stamp

                  Let's see now!

                  1. Non-original engine
                  2. Base coat clear coat
                  3. Second Class Restoration


                  "Run Forrest Run"

                  Comment

                  • William F.
                    Extremely Frequent Poster
                    • June 9, 2009
                    • 1363

                    #10
                    Re: '66 L36 Pad Stamp

                    Joe, maybe I used wrong words about restoration. Not "second class", just a few things like horn relay not correct or dated, hood latch receivers painted black rather than silver metal finish. How many factory AC, born BB's do you see? How many that aren't base clear coat? My question about decrease in price a knowledgeable person would pay related strictly to bad pad stamp as opposed to one with correct stamp.
                    Thanks.

                    Comment

                    • George W.
                      Very Frequent User
                      • July 31, 1998
                      • 322

                      #11
                      Re: '66 L36 Pad Stamp

                      As you know a car is worth what someone will pay for it; this has to many issues to be worth 95K IMO...
                      I agree with "run"...
                      Dr. George

                      Comment

                      • William F.
                        Extremely Frequent Poster
                        • June 9, 2009
                        • 1363

                        #12
                        Re: '66 L36 Pad Stamp

                        Ray
                        Reread my description. While apparently poor pad can't prove it's original engine; I know the history as I stated before; castings and dates are correct. I asked for opinions, but given knowing facts regarding this car.

                        Comment

                        • William P.
                          Expired
                          • August 31, 2003
                          • 135

                          #13
                          Re: '66 L36 Pad Stamp

                          If you are serious about buying the car make the deal conditional on having Al Grenning check out the pad. There were a # of 66 L36 engines in the fall of 65 that were factory grind outs .
                          Not every pad that left the factory was perfect .
                          Bill

                          Comment

                          • Dick W.
                            Former NCRS Director Region IV
                            • June 30, 1985
                            • 10483

                            #14
                            Re: '66 L36 Pad Stamp

                            Originally posted by William Purdy (40614)
                            If you are serious about buying the car make the deal conditional on having Al Grenning check out the pad. There were a # of 66 L36 engines in the fall of 65 that were factory grind outs .
                            Not every pad that left the factory was perfect .
                            Bill
                            With the very apparent faults, no need to pay anyone to look at it. NO engine left the plant with circular marks on the pad.
                            Dick Whittington

                            Comment

                            • William P.
                              Expired
                              • August 31, 2003
                              • 135

                              #15
                              Re: '66 L36 Pad Stamp

                              I do not see circular marks that would have been made by a conventional circular broach . Any machine that made the marks I see would have had to be made by a huge machine or a file .

                              I would still reccomend Mr Grenning's opinion.

                              Bill

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              Searching...Please wait.
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                              There are no results that meet this criteria.
                              Search Result for "|||"