1965 pop - NCRS Discussion Boards

1965 pop

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • John S.
    Very Frequent User
    • May 4, 2008
    • 424

    1965 pop

    I was trolling known Corvette web sites and there is a 65 fuelie car for sale here in So. Cal. Shows a picture of the POP. The POP is blank with all the typical vin and other numbers in the "GM" tape like they would use for the new owners name and address typically. My POP is more the standard and I believe original as I have the NCRS POP book and all the "flaws match up with mine. Has this ever been discussed before? Has anyone ever seen this before?
    John Seeley
    67 Black/Teal
    300 hp 3 speed coupe
    65 Maroon/Black
    35k mile Fuelie coupe
  • William C.
    NCRS Past President
    • May 31, 1975
    • 6037

    #2
    Re: 1965 pop

    A picture might be helpful...
    Bill Clupper #618

    Comment

    • John S.
      Very Frequent User
      • May 4, 2008
      • 424

      #3
      Re: 1965 pop

      Bill,

      Best I can do is copy and paste the link to the web site. Hope this does not upset anyone.


      John
      John Seeley
      67 Black/Teal
      300 hp 3 speed coupe
      65 Maroon/Black
      35k mile Fuelie coupe

      Comment

      • Bob H.
        Very Frequent User
        • July 31, 2000
        • 803

        #4
        Re: 1965 pop

        Didn't the dealer imprint the plate? If so, I think it is plausible to have not been imprinted. Looks nice. Wonder why such a nice car has never been judged?

        Comment

        • John H.
          Beyond Control Poster
          • December 1, 1997
          • 16513

          #5
          Re: 1965 pop

          The POP is not original (or typical), and neither is the window sticker.

          Comment

          • Mike E.
            Very Frequent User
            • June 24, 2012
            • 920

            #6
            Re: 1965 pop

            Here as an images of a POP from a car that ProTeam has for sale that's within a month or so after and the one you posted the link to.

            There is big difference between the two.

            Note: I've reversed them to make easier to read.







            Mike

            Comment

            • Roy S.
              Past National Judging Chairman
              • July 31, 1979
              • 1025

              #7
              Re: 1965 pop

              Originally posted by Bob Hoffman (34576)
              Didn't the dealer imprint the plate? If so, I think it is plausible to have not been imprinted. Looks nice. Wonder why such a nice car has never been judged?
              The factory imprinted the plate, the dealer added the GM Dymo tape with the new owners name and data.

              Comment

              • Roy S.
                Past National Judging Chairman
                • July 31, 1979
                • 1025

                #8

                Comment

                • Patrick B.
                  Extremely Frequent Poster
                  • August 31, 1985
                  • 1995

                  #9
                  Re: 1965 pop

                  When a car was sold and the second owner obtained the remaining warrantee, I believe the dealer made the second owner's protecto-plate. Many dealers had addressograph machines. Could this be a second owners POP made by a dealer who had the DYMO tape equipment but not a Addressograph?

                  Comment

                  • Roy S.
                    Past National Judging Chairman
                    • July 31, 1979
                    • 1025

                    #10
                    Re: 1965 pop

                    Originally posted by Patrick Boyd (9110)
                    When a car was sold and the second owner obtained the remaining warrantee, I believe the dealer made the second owner's protecto-plate. Many dealers had addressograph machines. Could this be a second owners POP made by a dealer who had the DYMO tape equipment but not a Addressograph?
                    I guess it could, I've never seen one like it and we all know you should never say never.

                    Comment

                    • Michael H.
                      Expired
                      • January 29, 2008
                      • 7477

                      #11
                      Re: 1965 pop

                      Originally posted by Patrick Boyd (9110)
                      When a car was sold and the second owner obtained the remaining warrantee, I believe the dealer made the second owner's protecto-plate. Many dealers had addressograph machines. Could this be a second owners POP made by a dealer who had the DYMO tape equipment but not a Addressograph?
                      Patrick,

                      I don't remember ever seeing an address-o-graph machine in a dealer from that era. Those machines were huge and very expensive.

                      I vaguely remember that dealers were instructed to remove and replace the dymo tape with the new 2nd owners information at point of resale.

                      If an original warranty book was lost in the 60's, the dealer (or zone office?) could replace it with an new unstamped version.

                      Comment

                      • Carl N.
                        Expired
                        • April 30, 1984
                        • 592

                        #12
                        Re: 1965 pop

                        Just FYI and has no bearing on this '65. Plains Chevrolet in Amarillo Texas had an address-o-graph machine which was used for plates for mass mailings several times a year to past customers. Also it was not uncommon for some of the small dealers in the Texas Oklahoma Panhandle area to fail to place the DYMO tape on the plates. Some of these dealers seldom sold a Corvette, but sold lots and lots of pick-em-ups and when they came in for service in some cases the protecto plate was kept at the dealership for the customer.

                        Comment

                        • Mark L.
                          Very Frequent User
                          • July 31, 1989
                          • 560

                          #13
                          Re: 1965 pop

                          Patrick, I agree with your comment. My 67 came with two POP's...the original and one that was made by the dealer for the second owner as the car was still under warranty. The replacement was imprinted just like the original however one close look at each can ID the one from the factory.

                          Comment

                          • Tim G.
                            Extremely Frequent Poster
                            • March 1, 1990
                            • 1374

                            #14
                            Re: 1965 pop

                            I'm not sure if it is the same car, but a maroon/maroon '65 fuelie roadster was at Frisco two years ago. It received a Top Flight. That car had no paperwork.

                            Comment

                            • Joel F.
                              Expired
                              • April 30, 2004
                              • 659

                              #15
                              Re: 1965 pop

                              Originally posted by Tim Gilmore (16887)
                              I'm not sure if it is the same car, but a maroon/maroon '65 fuelie roadster was at Frisco two years ago. It received a Top Flight. That car had no paperwork.
                              I sort of doubt it could be; few dealers would fail to mention something as significant as a TF when they gave a good deal of detail on things like casting dates and stampings.

                              What does the group think of the pad?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              Searching...Please wait.
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                              There are no results that meet this criteria.
                              Search Result for "|||"