C2 Upper Ball Joint Availablity - NCRS Discussion Boards

C2 Upper Ball Joint Availablity

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bob J.
    Very Frequent User
    • December 1, 1977
    • 714

    #16
    Re: C2 Upper Ball Joint Availablity

    100_2138.jpgThe 63-64 Uppers have unique resistance weld depressions that are a slash, compared to a dot or circle on later joints.
    The welds dsifferences are easy to spot if you're checking originality.

    Comment

    • David L.
      Expired
      • July 31, 1980
      • 3310

      #17
      Re: C2 Upper Ball Joint Availablity

      Originally posted by Joe Lucia (12484)

      I've always wondered why GM considered it OK to use 5/16" rivets for PRODUCTION installation of the upper ball joints but required 3/8" bolts for the SERVICE ball joints. For the lowers, 3/8" rivets were used in PRODUCTION and 3/8" bolts supplied in SERVICE.

      [ATTACH=CONFIG]45225[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]45226[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]45227[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]45228[/ATTACH]
      Joe,

      The 1963-1967 Corvette AIM's list the upper ball joint rivets as GM # 118170 and the lower ball joint rivets as GM # 442659.
      The 118170 rivets are listed in my GM Standard Parts catalog (Oct. 1988) in Gr. 8.967 as flat head point solid, material is steel, and dimensions are 1/4" X 3/4". I assume that this is a mistake. I could not find rivet # 442659 in any of my parts catalogs.

      I thought that I had a few NOS GM ball joints that I bought back in the 1980's or 1990's that have been in storage ever since. However, they are not GM. They are in plain white boxes with just the GM part # 3886422. One attaching bolt is 5/16"-24 X 1" (with grade 5 markings) and the other is a strange looking bolt 5/16"-24 X 1 1/8" with an almost round head (0.95" dia.) with two flattened areas to use a 7/8" wrench. I remember when I replaced the ball joints during the restoration of my 1966 about 25-30 years ago the aftermarket ball joints had the same type of bolts. I elected to use standard grade 5 bolts instead. Any thoughts about the strange bolt in the photo below?

      Dave

      Comment

      • Timothy B.
        Extremely Frequent Poster
        • April 30, 1983
        • 5186

        #18
        Re: C2 Upper Ball Joint Availablity

        David,

        I believe that strange bolt head is a stop for the steering arm, to the best of my knowledge it's used on most replacement ball joints

        Comment

        • Tracy C.
          Expired
          • July 31, 2003
          • 2739

          #19
          Re: C2 Upper Ball Joint Availablity

          David,

          I remember seeing that type of bolt too. The only thing I could figure is that it was intended to be a "stop" for the steering link. But it didn't seem to ever get close to it even at full lock.

          tc

          Comment

          • Tracy C.
            Expired
            • July 31, 2003
            • 2739

            #20
            Re: C2 Upper Ball Joint Availablity

            Originally posted by Paul Oslansky (18046)
            William

            There has been extensive discussion on the board about those ball joints. The answer would be yes and no some areas look typical but other areas do not. But my biggest issue along with others is what test have been performed on the part to validate there strength in other words would you drive your car with them installed?
            I bought mine from AFC and intend to drive the snot out of my car post "blue ribbon". I'll submit that any of these "correct configuration" type of replacement ball joints are coming from the same place regardless of the supplier you purchase them from. They have been out there for 5 or 6 years and I have yet to hear of any failures.

            tc

            Comment

            • Bob J.
              Very Frequent User
              • December 1, 1977
              • 714

              #21
              Re: C2 Upper Ball Joint Availablity

              Paul,
              being made in China and with the disclaimer " DO NOT GREASE OR WARRANTY IS VOID" would make me look elsewhere.
              Bob

              Comment

              • Joe L.
                Beyond Control Poster
                • February 1, 1988
                • 43219

                #22
                Re: C2 Upper Ball Joint Availablity

                Originally posted by Tracy Crisler (40411)
                David,

                I remember seeing that type of bolt too. The only thing I could figure is that it was intended to be a "stop" for the steering link. But it didn't seem to ever get close to it even at full lock.

                tc

                Tracy, David, and Tim------



                The bolt with the large head was also supplied with the GM lower ball joints and it is intended to be a steering "stop". That's another thing I've always wondered about. In the PRODUCTION ball joint installation, there was no such stop or, even, the equivalent thereof. So, why did there need to be one in SERVICE? However, these ball joints were used for other than Corvette applications. So, it may be that in those applications some sort of "stop" was part of the PRODUCTION installation so it was also included in SERVICE. While it's superfluous for the Corvette application, it doesn't negatively affect anything (except configuration for those so-inclined).
                In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                Comment

                • Joe L.
                  Beyond Control Poster
                  • February 1, 1988
                  • 43219

                  #23
                  Re: C2 Upper Ball Joint Availablity

                  Originally posted by Tracy Crisler (40411)
                  I bought mine from AFC and intend to drive the snot out of my car post "blue ribbon". I'll submit that any of these "correct configuration" type of replacement ball joints are coming from the same place regardless of the supplier you purchase them from. They have been out there for 5 or 6 years and I have yet to hear of any failures.

                  tc
                  Tracy-----

                  I have been told that these reproduction ball joints are manufactured in China by a company that is an OEM supplier to the automotive industry. That's a good sign since that presumably means they understand things like metallurgy, etc. Some of the Chinese parts are manufactured in "boutique", "small-time" operations that are pretty good at COPYING a part from the perspective of configuration but not much else. So, the parts may be good only "skin deep" which is not a good thing for mechanical or, especially, safety-related components.
                  In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                  Comment

                  • Mike E.
                    Very Frequent User
                    • June 24, 2012
                    • 920

                    #24
                    Re: C2 Upper Ball Joint Availablity

                    I'm thinking it was about time to change this one.




                    Mike

                    Comment

                    • Paul O.
                      Frequent User
                      • August 31, 1990
                      • 1716

                      #25
                      Re: C2 Upper Ball Joint Availablity

                      Originally posted by David Liukkonen (3775)
                      Joe,

                      The 1963-1967 Corvette AIM's list the upper ball joint rivets as GM # 118170 and the lower ball joint rivets as GM # 442659.
                      The 118170 rivets are listed in my GM Standard Parts catalog (Oct. 1988) in Gr. 8.967 as flat head point solid, material is steel, and dimensions are 1/4" X 3/4". I assume that this is a mistake. I could not find rivet # 442659 in any of my parts catalogs.

                      I thought that I had a few NOS GM ball joints that I bought back in the 1980's or 1990's that have been in storage ever since. However, they are not GM. They are in plain white boxes with just the GM part # 3886422. One attaching bolt is 5/16"-24 X 1" (with grade 5 markings) and the other is a strange looking bolt 5/16"-24 X 1 1/8" with an almost round head (0.95" dia.) with two flattened areas to use a 7/8" wrench. I remember when I replaced the ball joints during the restoration of my 1966 about 25-30 years ago the aftermarket ball joints had the same type of bolts. I elected to use standard grade 5 bolts instead. Any thoughts about the strange bolt in the photo below?

                      Dave

                      The large bolt head if I remember correctly you install the flat section against the bottom lip of the A-arm and would stop it from rotating. I remember seeing some replacement with 2 of those bolts.

                      Comment

                      • Tracy C.
                        Expired
                        • July 31, 2003
                        • 2739

                        #26
                        Re: C2 Upper Ball Joint Availablity

                        That would make me a little queezy too Bob. My AFC parts had no such warning and they took greese just fine.

                        Comment

                        • Ronald L.
                          Extremely Frequent Poster
                          • October 18, 2009
                          • 3248

                          #27
                          Re: C2 Upper Ball Joint Availablity

                          I hope some of you that are professing about "do not grease" realize how silly that sounds, long about 1995 or so all suspension systems became 'sealed for life' meaning "do not grease" and nearly all are coming from Asia. Have you ever read the service recommendations on any vehicle made past that point?

                          Would be very nice to have made in the USA, but its not happening any time soon with an anti manufacturing climate and entitlement.

                          Now, as it applies to any specific reproduction or service part, you should be concerned it has been tested to the OEM specification - ask the supplier to show the spec and test results.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          Searching...Please wait.
                          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                          An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                          There are no results that meet this criteria.
                          Search Result for "|||"