Re: Help with GM part numbers from '65 AIM
Thanks for the interesting link. I particularly enjoyed learning that:
"The date of a revision almost never indicates the date the change actually took place on the line; it just shows when the sheet was revised, which could have been well ahead of or well after the part change occurred in production at the assembly plant."
That makes it very clear that you can't tell from the AIM when some change actually happened in terms of a precise date.
Gary
Thanks for the interesting link. I particularly enjoyed learning that:
"The date of a revision almost never indicates the date the change actually took place on the line; it just shows when the sheet was revised, which could have been well ahead of or well after the part change occurred in production at the assembly plant."
That makes it very clear that you can't tell from the AIM when some change actually happened in terms of a precise date.
Gary
Comment