What ballast resistor for a 55 V8? - NCRS Discussion Boards

What ballast resistor for a 55 V8?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Troy P.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • February 1, 1989
    • 1284

    What ballast resistor for a 55 V8?

    The 1955 Corvette parts book does not list the ballast resistor for some reason. What GM part number and what ohm resistor is correct for this application?
  • Joe L.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • February 1, 1988
    • 43218

    #2
    Re: What ballast resistor for a 55 V8?

    Originally posted by Troy Pyles (14528)
    The 1955 Corvette parts book does not list the ballast resistor for some reason. What GM part number and what ohm resistor is correct for this application?

    Troy------



    GM #1931385. The spec I have is 0.3 OHMS.
    Last edited by Joe L.; October 28, 2012, 12:37 PM.
    In Appreciation of John Hinckley

    Comment

    • Jerry B.
      Very Frequent User
      • August 31, 1994
      • 416

      #3
      Re: What ballast resistor for a 55 V8?

      Joe, would that apply to a 57?

      Comment

      • Joe L.
        Beyond Control Poster
        • February 1, 1988
        • 43218

        #4
        Re: What ballast resistor for a 55 V8?

        Originally posted by Jerry Baxter (24968)
        Joe, would that apply to a 57?
        Jerry-----


        Yes.
        In Appreciation of John Hinckley

        Comment

        • Troy P.
          Extremely Frequent Poster
          • February 1, 1989
          • 1284

          #5
          Re: What ballast resistor for a 55 V8?

          Thanks Joe.

          Comment

          • Joe L.
            Beyond Control Poster
            • February 1, 1988
            • 43218

            #6
            Re: What ballast resistor for a 55 V8?

            Originally posted by Troy Pyles (14528)
            Thanks Joe.
            Troy------


            One thing to keep in mind: The GM #1931385 was available in SERVICE for a LOT of years----from 1955 until August, 1999. Functionally, any 1931385 should work for the application. However, as far as configuration goes, there may very well have been differences over those 44 years.
            In Appreciation of John Hinckley

            Comment

            Working...
            Searching...Please wait.
            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
            An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
            There are no results that meet this criteria.
            Search Result for "|||"