What has anyones experince been using the 10.5 compression piston in the 270 horse 283
I have the heads the correct cam and of course the wickedly expensive carbs and I wonderd if anyone used the 10.5 in this engine was happy with the outcome as opposed to the standard 9.5 to 1
what i know is the book says they used 9.5 to 1 in the 270 horse with the high lift cam I'm looking to get this new engine running right and I find the original carbs as in the twin carbs have a lot of CFM for the 283 its nearly 800 cfm
I believe using the domed pistons may actulally help burn off some of this gas
I found the correct carbs and the correct cam so here's hoping, also after spending all this money it might be nice to have a little more power also I find it strange that the book says 270 horse vs 245 horse (hydraulic cam model) for the twin carbs on both these engines did GM actually create 25 more horsepower with only a solid lifter cam and some carb tweaking I have the correct 270 horse carbs that im sure of.
how could they get an extra 25 horse with just a cam or is the 270 horse actually a 10.5 to 1 and erverywhere I look is a misprint
the fuely specification (290 horse ) which in the fuely's case is 10.5 to 1 so i know they used them in a 283
Thanks to anyone who has an oppinoon or info on this
Philip mclachlen member 54904
I have the heads the correct cam and of course the wickedly expensive carbs and I wonderd if anyone used the 10.5 in this engine was happy with the outcome as opposed to the standard 9.5 to 1
what i know is the book says they used 9.5 to 1 in the 270 horse with the high lift cam I'm looking to get this new engine running right and I find the original carbs as in the twin carbs have a lot of CFM for the 283 its nearly 800 cfm
I believe using the domed pistons may actulally help burn off some of this gas
I found the correct carbs and the correct cam so here's hoping, also after spending all this money it might be nice to have a little more power also I find it strange that the book says 270 horse vs 245 horse (hydraulic cam model) for the twin carbs on both these engines did GM actually create 25 more horsepower with only a solid lifter cam and some carb tweaking I have the correct 270 horse carbs that im sure of.
how could they get an extra 25 horse with just a cam or is the 270 horse actually a 10.5 to 1 and erverywhere I look is a misprint
the fuely specification (290 horse ) which in the fuely's case is 10.5 to 1 so i know they used them in a 283
Thanks to anyone who has an oppinoon or info on this
Philip mclachlen member 54904
Comment