Damaged Torque Conv Inspection pan - NCRS Discussion Boards

Damaged Torque Conv Inspection pan

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Al R.
    Very Frequent User
    • June 30, 1988
    • 687

    Damaged Torque Conv Inspection pan

    I sent numerous items out to a local machine shop to have them "hot tanked" for cleaning. The torque converter/flex plate inspection pan for my 67 powerglide was damaged too much to use. I've tried the usual used parts businesses with no success. Anyone have one or know where to locate one? TIA Al
  • Al R.
    Very Frequent User
    • June 30, 1988
    • 687

    #2
    Re: Damaged Torque Conv Inspection pan

    Anyone know of any old bone yards still in business with chevys from the early 60s? All the ones I knew of in eastern NC are no longer in business. The EPA closed most of them after Hurricane Floyd flooded eastern NC and had them crushed and hauled off.

    Comment

    • Joe L.
      Beyond Control Poster
      • January 31, 1988
      • 43194

      #3
      Re: Damaged Torque Conv Inspection pan

      Originally posted by Al Rains (13251)
      Anyone know of any old bone yards still in business with chevys from the early 60s? All the ones I knew of in eastern NC are no longer in business. The EPA closed most of them after Hurricane Floyd flooded eastern NC and had them crushed and hauled off.
      Al------


      There should still be plenty of these underpans around. They were used for most 1962-68 passenger cars and light trucks with Powerglide. They are by no means a Corvette-unique item.
      In Appreciation of John Hinckley

      Comment

      • Paul J.
        Expired
        • September 9, 2008
        • 2091

        #4
        Re: Damaged Torque Conv Inspection pan

        Originally posted by Al Rains (13251)
        Anyone know of any old bone yards still in business with chevys from the early 60s? All the ones I knew of in eastern NC are no longer in business. The EPA closed most of them after Hurricane Floyd flooded eastern NC and had them crushed and hauled off.
        How far east, Al? Richard's in Ashboro specializes in old cars. Martin's in Zebulon used to have some older stuff. You might try Joker Tilton, he used to have older stuff too. Yesterday I passed that place beside of LQK in Kinston and it looked like he might have some stuff (although he's a processor). There are also many others that I have'nt found out about yet. Let me know where you find it.

        Paul

        Comment

        • Al R.
          Very Frequent User
          • June 30, 1988
          • 687

          #5
          Re: Damaged Torque Conv Inspection pan

          Hi Paul, wasn't aware of Martin's. Would they be listed in the zebulon exchange? The recycler you saw at LQK will not allow anyone to purchase parts- I've asked before on another project. Who is Joker Tilton? E-mail me at a.p.rains@att.net or PM me Thanks, Al

          Comment

          • Joe L.
            Beyond Control Poster
            • January 31, 1988
            • 43194

            #6
            Re: Damaged Torque Conv Inspection pan

            Originally posted by Al Rains (13251)
            Anyone know of any old bone yards still in business with chevys from the early 60s? All the ones I knew of in eastern NC are no longer in business. The EPA closed most of them after Hurricane Floyd flooded eastern NC and had them crushed and hauled off.
            Al-----


            By the way, the attached photos show an NOS example [not for sale] of what you need:


            DSCN2619.jpgDSCN2620.jpgDSCN2621.jpgDSCN2622.jpg
            In Appreciation of John Hinckley

            Comment

            • Paul J.
              Expired
              • September 9, 2008
              • 2091

              #7
              Re: Damaged Torque Conv Inspection pan

              Originally posted by Joe Lucia (12484)
              Al-----


              By the way, the attached photos show an NOS example [not for sale] of what you need:


              [ATTACH=CONFIG]36697[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]36698[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]36699[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]36700[/ATTACH]
              Ah, Joe...come on...what a tease!

              Comment

              • Al R.
                Very Frequent User
                • June 30, 1988
                • 687

                #8
                Re: Damaged Torque Conv Inspection pan

                Hey Joe, I have 1 damaged by the machine shop,so I don't need to know what 1 looks like. WHAT GOES AROUND, COMES AROUND!!!!

                Comment

                • Richard M.
                  Super Moderator
                  • August 31, 1988
                  • 11302

                  #9
                  Re: Damaged Torque Conv Inspection pan

                  Found some candidates????? Maybe????

                  Says 62-64 Impala but it looks similar.....


                  $(KGrHqEOKikE5hCZM34iBOkiBWNIsw~~60_12.JPG



                  ....or a nice chrome repro! Beadblast and paint it black???


                  423458018_o.jpg

                  Comment

                  • Richard M.
                    Super Moderator
                    • August 31, 1988
                    • 11302

                    #10
                    Re: Damaged Torque Conv Inspection pan

                    found another......Says Corvette in the ad so the price just went up.



                    !B8mdjuw!mk~$(KGrHqV,!lsEy+jC1VezBM3f4rg2Hg~~0_12.JPG

                    Comment

                    • Joe L.
                      Beyond Control Poster
                      • January 31, 1988
                      • 43194

                      #11
                      Re: Damaged Torque Conv Inspection pan

                      Originally posted by Al Rains (13251)
                      Hey Joe, I have 1 damaged by the machine shop,so I don't need to know what 1 looks like. WHAT GOES AROUND, COMES AROUND!!!!
                      Al-------

                      You said it was damaged by the machine shop but you didn't say to what extent it was damaged. There are quite a few variations of these underpans, some only subtly different. Plus, I have no way of knowing if the one you have now is even correct. So, I posted these photos so that you could see what a complete, undamaged part of the correct part number looks like to assist you in identifying and finding a correct replacement. That's why I took the time to take and post several photos. Based upon your response, I take it that you think I did this for some mean-spirited or self-serving purpose. So, I'll have to make sure I don't offer this kind of help again. Also, as I mentioned previously, this is anything but a rare part so why on earth would I want to "tease you" or "gloat" that I have one?
                      In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                      Comment

                      • Al R.
                        Very Frequent User
                        • June 30, 1988
                        • 687

                        #12
                        Re: Damaged Torque Conv Inspection pan

                        Joe, I guess I owe you an apology on this. I didn't say you were teasing or gloating, but apparently others must have thought so. I just mis-interpreted you intentions on this as you were not clear as to why you were posting them. But, if I may be bold enough to ask, assuming you accept my sincere apology, what subtle differences should I be looking for for a 67? Thanks, Al

                        Comment

                        • Al R.
                          Very Frequent User
                          • June 30, 1988
                          • 687

                          #13
                          Re: Damaged Torque Conv Inspection pan

                          Thanks Richard, I see what you meant about the price going up on the 3rd one. The 1st 1 is high enough. Al

                          Comment

                          • Joe L.
                            Beyond Control Poster
                            • January 31, 1988
                            • 43194

                            #14
                            Re: Damaged Torque Conv Inspection pan

                            Originally posted by Al Rains (13251)
                            Joe, I guess I owe you an apology on this. I didn't say you were teasing or gloating, but apparently others must have thought so. I just mis-interpreted you intentions on this as you were not clear as to why you were posting them. But, if I may be bold enough to ask, assuming you accept my sincere apology, what subtle differences should I be looking for for a 67? Thanks, Al
                            Al------


                            There were at least 4 part numbers for these Powerglide underpans and I think there were probably several more. Just what the exact differences are I do not know but I'm very confident that the differences were minor. All I can say for sure is that the one that is correct for your application should appear exactly as the one I pictured.
                            In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                            Comment

                            • Joe L.
                              Beyond Control Poster
                              • January 31, 1988
                              • 43194

                              #15
                              Re: Damaged Torque Conv Inspection pan

                              Originally posted by Al Rains (13251)
                              Thanks Richard, I see what you meant about the price going up on the 3rd one. The 1st 1 is high enough. Al
                              Al------


                              In my opinion, those underpans are way over-priced. As I mentioned, this is not a rare part. There were probably MILLIONS of these originally manufactured and used on cars. Yes, a lot of them are probably scrapped by now since they were last used on a car in the late 60's. Nevertheless, there should be an ample supply remaining and, likely, very little demand for those that do remain. These things do not usually wear out.
                              In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              Searching...Please wait.
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                              There are no results that meet this criteria.
                              Search Result for "|||"