Recently after rebuilding the 454 in my '72 I had an immediate rear thrust bearing failure which resulted in having to tear down the engine once again.
During the brief period in which I was able to drive it and break it in I was less than impressed with the increase in power that I had somehow anticipated from the rebuild. Consequently, this time around I made some "internal changes" within the engine while keeping it completely original looking from the outside.
I dyno'd the engine last week and was able to get 590 ft./lbs. of torque from it and 468 h.p. with the original carb and air cleaner ! While I am very pleased, I decided to freshen up my transmission and torque converter to ensure everything could handle the extra muscle. Not stopping there I naturally replaced the u-joints with some h.d. Spicer units and while doing so I noticed a strange mark on my main driveshaft tube.
It would appear that possibly sometime in the cars' earlier lifetime the emergency brake cable may have hung down loosely enough to make contact with the driveshaft tube. This is the only possible explanation I can come up with for this perfectly concentric line I found neatly "cut" into the surface of the driveshaft.
I carefully did a non-destructive test of the driveshaft tube and found the wall thickness to be very consistent at .187 inch (3/16") except at the point of the groove which is at .177 inch. The groove is almost 1/16 wide.
My question is this :
Is there any way of accurately predicting what such a wear mark may cause in terms of overall weakness to the tube under hard/heavy acceleration? In other words is the reduction of 10 one-thousandths of an inch going to cause a potential fail to occur under extreme loading or are these driveshafts built so beefy that it should be little or no concern?
Access to quality driveline shops in my area are limited and I have not had much luck finding someone sympathetic to my quest in repairing this one or manufacturing another to orig. specifications.
Any comments or advice would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks, Rick
During the brief period in which I was able to drive it and break it in I was less than impressed with the increase in power that I had somehow anticipated from the rebuild. Consequently, this time around I made some "internal changes" within the engine while keeping it completely original looking from the outside.
I dyno'd the engine last week and was able to get 590 ft./lbs. of torque from it and 468 h.p. with the original carb and air cleaner ! While I am very pleased, I decided to freshen up my transmission and torque converter to ensure everything could handle the extra muscle. Not stopping there I naturally replaced the u-joints with some h.d. Spicer units and while doing so I noticed a strange mark on my main driveshaft tube.
It would appear that possibly sometime in the cars' earlier lifetime the emergency brake cable may have hung down loosely enough to make contact with the driveshaft tube. This is the only possible explanation I can come up with for this perfectly concentric line I found neatly "cut" into the surface of the driveshaft.
I carefully did a non-destructive test of the driveshaft tube and found the wall thickness to be very consistent at .187 inch (3/16") except at the point of the groove which is at .177 inch. The groove is almost 1/16 wide.
My question is this :
Is there any way of accurately predicting what such a wear mark may cause in terms of overall weakness to the tube under hard/heavy acceleration? In other words is the reduction of 10 one-thousandths of an inch going to cause a potential fail to occur under extreme loading or are these driveshafts built so beefy that it should be little or no concern?
Access to quality driveline shops in my area are limited and I have not had much luck finding someone sympathetic to my quest in repairing this one or manufacturing another to orig. specifications.
Any comments or advice would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks, Rick
Comment