Hello,
I have two what I believe are original GM supplied pulleys for 1966 427 power steering pump applications. They are both casting # 3878245 DK . Both have been on my shelf a long time, I just cleaned them both up and see a difference in the castings and the way each was machined.
The one in the LH pic is representative of what I am accustomed to seeing, it has a pronounced raised cast area machined finished on the OD of the face, and the rear face. Also a raised machined area under where the retaining nut would seat.
The one in the RH pic has a flush face, without the raised area in either location on its face although it does have it on the rear, and its more pronounced, deeper if you will. The face of this one appears to be hit lightly wit a disk grinder in an attempt to give it a finished look I assume.
Dimensionally both are identical as measured on a surface plate between the rim and hub stop.
Could this be attributed to mold shift when cast?
Anyone seen one like this before?
Curiosity has gotten the best of me!
Thanks, Bill Caldwell
I have two what I believe are original GM supplied pulleys for 1966 427 power steering pump applications. They are both casting # 3878245 DK . Both have been on my shelf a long time, I just cleaned them both up and see a difference in the castings and the way each was machined.
The one in the LH pic is representative of what I am accustomed to seeing, it has a pronounced raised cast area machined finished on the OD of the face, and the rear face. Also a raised machined area under where the retaining nut would seat.
The one in the RH pic has a flush face, without the raised area in either location on its face although it does have it on the rear, and its more pronounced, deeper if you will. The face of this one appears to be hit lightly wit a disk grinder in an attempt to give it a finished look I assume.
Dimensionally both are identical as measured on a surface plate between the rim and hub stop.
Could this be attributed to mold shift when cast?
Anyone seen one like this before?
Curiosity has gotten the best of me!
Thanks, Bill Caldwell
Comment