If all you want is to drive your vette in a parade or not experiance the real power they had using the right octane then these clips/ articles are not for you.
I am talking about the early high compression vettes 1971 & older.
Forgive me but this is in laymans term that I think are easier to understand.
These are real tests, not paper formula's of how it might work.
A 365 hp 327 with compression in the 11's probably looses about 20% of it's HP using pump gas.
To one that bought one later in life it feels pretty good but I want it to feel ORIGINAL and scare the he?? out of myself and others.
I am old enough to, and was able to drive these monsters back then and some even in the 1/4 mile.
Using todays gas your lucky to turn in the 14 second range when the same car turned in the 12's on the right fuel.
I think I read that 93 octane = 98 using todays method of measuring octane.
Thats not enough to get tha max HP tout of your engine. The tests using a 200K gas engine that determine knock say that it is 104 octane that is needed.
It was said on this forum that low octane and high octane burn at the same rate, tests prove otherwise reguardless of a formula on paper that is hard to understand.
I have a hard time understanding big words combined with formulas and acronyms.
One that holds a patent tells of a champion spark plug test that prooves different (see attached).
There's actually a lot of tests that show different, fuel burn propagation rate is one but I know there are more.
I will post the compression vs octane tests done in a lab as soon as I can get attached to another post here.
Here is a post that I read in another forum by one that holds a patent on this related problem.
(I will follow up with the test done with the 200K test engine.)
Why am I being repeatedly asked to answer questions that are explained with relevant SAE references in my patent 4,961,406?
Obviously most of you are younger and far more educated than I am. That being said I am the first person who ever applied for a patent on the concept of using a detonation sensor to control intake valve events for the purpose of altering combustion rates. Have any of you read Toyotas patent 6,848,422? Pretty much says the same thing I patented
over a decade before their patent was issued.
Many years ago Champion Spark plug would host seminars and demonstrate the different burn rates of low octane and high octane fuel. They would use two clear tubes about 50 feet long and put low octane in one tube and high octane in the other. They would light them both at the same time and you could watch the low octane burn to the end of the tube faster than the high octane.
Maybe somebody could explain to me how this doesn't demonstrate the different burn rates of low octane and high octane fuel?
DOM
I am talking about the early high compression vettes 1971 & older.
Forgive me but this is in laymans term that I think are easier to understand.
These are real tests, not paper formula's of how it might work.
A 365 hp 327 with compression in the 11's probably looses about 20% of it's HP using pump gas.
To one that bought one later in life it feels pretty good but I want it to feel ORIGINAL and scare the he?? out of myself and others.
I am old enough to, and was able to drive these monsters back then and some even in the 1/4 mile.
Using todays gas your lucky to turn in the 14 second range when the same car turned in the 12's on the right fuel.
I think I read that 93 octane = 98 using todays method of measuring octane.
Thats not enough to get tha max HP tout of your engine. The tests using a 200K gas engine that determine knock say that it is 104 octane that is needed.
It was said on this forum that low octane and high octane burn at the same rate, tests prove otherwise reguardless of a formula on paper that is hard to understand.
I have a hard time understanding big words combined with formulas and acronyms.
One that holds a patent tells of a champion spark plug test that prooves different (see attached).
There's actually a lot of tests that show different, fuel burn propagation rate is one but I know there are more.
I will post the compression vs octane tests done in a lab as soon as I can get attached to another post here.
Here is a post that I read in another forum by one that holds a patent on this related problem.
(I will follow up with the test done with the 200K test engine.)
Why am I being repeatedly asked to answer questions that are explained with relevant SAE references in my patent 4,961,406?
Obviously most of you are younger and far more educated than I am. That being said I am the first person who ever applied for a patent on the concept of using a detonation sensor to control intake valve events for the purpose of altering combustion rates. Have any of you read Toyotas patent 6,848,422? Pretty much says the same thing I patented
over a decade before their patent was issued.
Many years ago Champion Spark plug would host seminars and demonstrate the different burn rates of low octane and high octane fuel. They would use two clear tubes about 50 feet long and put low octane in one tube and high octane in the other. They would light them both at the same time and you could watch the low octane burn to the end of the tube faster than the high octane.
Maybe somebody could explain to me how this doesn't demonstrate the different burn rates of low octane and high octane fuel?
DOM
Comment