Attention 1968 Convertible Owners - NCRS Discussion Boards

Attention 1968 Convertible Owners

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Terry M.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • September 30, 1980
    • 15599

    #16
    Re: Attention 1968 Convertible Owners

    Originally posted by Paul Borowski (26140)
    Terry, none missing. Posted before I opened these up to view. Mine has all four. My apologies for the confusion.
    Thanks Paul. No problem.
    Terry

    Comment

    • Larry K.
      Expired
      • April 1, 2004
      • 6

      #17
      Re: Attention 1968 Convertible Owners

      Non AC car
      No braces
      VIN 04205
      Nov 67

      Comment

      • Michael D.
        Expired
        • June 30, 1996
        • 536

        #18
        Re: Attention 1968 Convertible Owners

        Originally posted by Mark Donnally (13264)
        What's the vin, Michael?
        Oops. Typo error. Left out a six. #16660

        Comment

        • Paul B.
          Very Frequent User
          • April 30, 1995
          • 482

          #19
          Re: Attention 1968 Convertible Owners

          Originally posted by James Hummel (47065)
          Non AC car
          No braces
          VIN 00320 Sept. 68

          ...James, if your car really is VIN#00320, it'd be 1967 built '68? Probably a third or fourth day production car?

          Comment

          • Mark D.
            Extremely Frequent Poster
            • June 30, 1988
            • 2151

            #20
            Re: Attention 1968 Convertible Owners

            Originally posted by Michael Davenport (27810)
            Oops. Typo error. Left out a six. #16660

            Hey pal, I'd be leaving a 6 out too.
            Kramden

            Comment

            • Terry M.
              Beyond Control Poster
              • September 30, 1980
              • 15599

              #21
              Re: Attention 1968 Convertible Owners

              Originally posted by Paul Borowski (26140)
              ...James, if your car really is VIN#00320, it'd be 1967 built '68? Probably a third or fourth day production car?
              I don't have my survey here at work, but it would have been a little later than that Paul. The 1968 model year started real slow. John Hinckley can tell us why, but he probably doesn't want to relive those days again.

              All that said you are right, #320 had to be Seoptember of 1967.
              Terry

              Comment

              • Mark D.
                Extremely Frequent Poster
                • June 30, 1988
                • 2151

                #22
                Re: Attention 1968 Convertible Owners

                Originally posted by Terry McManmon (3966)
                you are right, #320 had to be Seoptember of 1967.
                I knew what he meant and had it listed in the survey as 1967. It's hard to get anything over on a guy from Brunswick County in NC.
                Kramden

                Comment

                • George W.
                  Very Frequent User
                  • May 31, 2000
                  • 544

                  #23
                  Re: Attention 1968 Convertible Owners

                  Larry Karlo--Vette Nets now owns my old 400164, conv., 427, no a/c.
                  You might contact him to confirm, but i believe this car had no saddle, braces, or gussets.

                  403203-----Conv., a/c, 327, no gussets, no saddle, no braces.

                  414172-----Conv, no a/c, 427, Has gussets, saddle, and braces.

                  417688---- conv., a/c, 327, Has gussets, no saddle, no braces.

                  421786---- conv., no a/c, 427, Has gussets, has saddle and has braces.

                  G.

                  Comment

                  • Anthony S.
                    Very Frequent User
                    • April 3, 2008
                    • 183

                    #24
                    Re: Attention 1968 Convertible Owners

                    Mark,

                    1. No Braces or evidence of them
                    2. N/A
                    3. A/C Convertible
                    4. VIN #9736 - January 24, 1968

                    Anthony

                    Comment

                    • Dale C.
                      Expired
                      • November 1, 1999
                      • 844

                      #25
                      Re: Attention 1968 Convertible Owners

                      According to the AIM it looks like the addition of the convertible bracing was occurring late Jan., Feb or on into March and probably showed up sometime shortly after my Mar 8th car. I do have a welded in nut (item 17, added in the 4/4/68 AIM). I also have an original AIM that shows up to the 3/28/68 change and it has no nut 17 to hold the brace, so it would be hard to have the brace without this nut. My (13417) car (with A/C, C60) had the nut for the brace (see picture) welded in, probably for the upcoming bracing but shows no other evidence of the brace. The paint in the nut was not worn and the there are no other accompanying brackets or bracing to support the braces.
                      Dale
                      Attached Files
                      Last edited by Dale C.; September 7, 2011, 11:00 PM.

                      Comment

                      • Dale C.
                        Expired
                        • November 1, 1999
                        • 844

                        #26
                        Re: Attention 1968 Convertible Owners

                        The AIM page without the nut #17 but looks like it has welded nut like mine.
                        Attached Files

                        Comment

                        • Terry M.
                          Beyond Control Poster
                          • September 30, 1980
                          • 15599

                          #27
                          Re: Attention 1968 Convertible Owners

                          Originally posted by Paul Borowski (26140)
                          ...James, if your car really is VIN#00320, it'd be 1967 built '68? Probably a third or fourth day production car?
                          #320 would have a trim tag date of B12 - the 4th week of production. A slow start to 1968 MY, but 320 is a pretty early car still.
                          Terry

                          Comment

                          • Jim T.
                            Expired
                            • March 1, 1993
                            • 5351

                            #28
                            Re: Attention 1968 Convertible Owners

                            Originally posted by Dale Carlson (33147)
                            According to the AIM it looks like the addition of the convertible bracing was occurring late Jan., Feb or on into March and probably showed up sometime shortly after my Mar 8th car. I do have a welded in nut (item 17, added in the 4/4/68 AIM). I also have an original AIM that shows up to the 3/28/68 change and it has no nut 17 to hold the brace, so it would be hard to have the brace without this nut. My (13417) car (with A/C, C60) had the nut for the brace (see picture) welded in, probably for the upcoming bracing but shows no other evidence of the brace. The paint in the nut was not worn and the there are no other accompanying brackets or bracing to support the braces.
                            Dale
                            My 2/19/1968 has this brace and welded nut. As posted above, no braces.

                            Comment

                            • James H.
                              Expired
                              • February 22, 2007
                              • 130

                              #29
                              Re: Attention 1968 Convertible Owners

                              Sorry all,
                              I really did mean 67. Very eary build 68.
                              Too many long islands that night.
                              Jim

                              Comment

                              • Reba W.
                                Very Frequent User
                                • June 30, 1985
                                • 937

                                #30
                                Re: Attention 1968 Convertible Owners

                                We have received some very good information from responses to this question. We need to hear about cars built during March 1968. Please respond if you have information on those.

                                If you do not wish to post the VIN online, email Mark Donnally, Terry McManmon or me privately.

                                Thanks for your help.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                Searching...Please wait.
                                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                                An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                                There are no results that meet this criteria.
                                Search Result for "|||"