Cc's Carbon Vs. Aluminized Exhaust - NCRS Discussion Boards

Cc's Carbon Vs. Aluminized Exhaust

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rich C.
    Expired
    • January 1, 1994
    • 383

    Cc's Carbon Vs. Aluminized Exhaust

    I was getting ready to order a complete exhaust system from Corvette Central. You can get it in carbon or aluminized. Obviously either would lose points for lack of GM part #'s, etc. But would you gain a few points for the carbon system over the aluminized system?

    '73 LS-4 454
  • Terry M.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • September 30, 1980
    • 15599

    #2
    Re: Cc's Carbon Vs. Aluminized Exhaust

    Originally posted by Rich Cousineau (23820)
    I was getting ready to order a complete exhaust system from Corvette Central. You can get it in carbon or aluminized. Obviously either would lose points for lack of GM part #'s, etc. But would you gain a few points for the carbon system over the aluminized system?

    '73 LS-4 454
    Yes you will. There is a revised Standard Deduction sheet that was handed out at the Novi National Convention that includes a new deduction for aluminized parts (that were not originally aluminized -- and I can not think of anything on a 1972 and earlier Corvette that was aluminized from St Louis). I don't currently have my sheets at hand, and can not recall what it is, but there is a percentage deduct for aluminized parts. Perhaps someone else has that revision at hand.
    Terry

    Comment

    • Page C.
      Very Frequent User
      • February 1, 1979
      • 802

      #3
      Re: Cc's Carbon Vs. Aluminized Exhaust

      Terry,
      The revised standard deduction sheet (July 2011 Rev. 4.0) states the minimum deduction for aluminized parts is 25% for any part not originally aluminized and 50% for stainless steel parts that were not originally stainless steel. Remember these are the minimums not the maximums
      Page Campbell

      Comment

      • Terry M.
        Beyond Control Poster
        • September 30, 1980
        • 15599

        #4
        Re: Cc's Carbon Vs. Aluminized Exhaust

        Originally posted by Page Campbell (2299)
        Terry,
        The revised standard deduction sheet (July 2011 Rev. 4.0) states the minimum deduction for aluminized parts is 25% for any part not originally aluminized and 50% for stainless steel parts that were not originally stainless steel. Remember these are the minimums not the maximums
        Page Campbell
        Thanks for the info Page.
        Terry

        Comment

        • Patrick H.
          Beyond Control Poster
          • December 1, 1989
          • 11643

          #5
          Re: Cc's Carbon Vs. Aluminized Exhaust

          Net difference is probably 2-5 points at most, given all the configuration differences between CC pipes and originals.

          I'd get them aluminized and forget about fighting the rust. And, I did.

          Patrick
          Vice-Chairman (West), Michigan Chapter NCRS
          71 "deer modified" coupe
          72 5-Star Bowtie / Duntov coupe. https://www.flickr.com/photos/124695...57649252735124
          2008 coupe
          Available stickers: Engine suffix code, exhaust tips & mufflers, shocks, AIR diverter valve broadcast code.

          Comment

          • Edward J.
            Extremely Frequent Poster
            • September 15, 2008
            • 6942

            #6
            Re: Cc's Carbon Vs. Aluminized Exhaust

            I am with Patrick, rust looks bad on the undercarriage, aliuminized looks much cleaner, Rich unless your heading for a Duntov a few points are gained with the fire ext. and decal + driving points.
            Last edited by Edward J.; August 20, 2011, 05:03 PM.
            New England chapter member, 63 Convert. 327/340- Chapter/Regional/national Top Flight, 72 coupe- chapter and regional Top Flight.

            Comment

            • Michael W.
              Expired
              • April 1, 1997
              • 4290

              #7
              Re: Cc's Carbon Vs. Aluminized Exhaust

              A rusty carbon exhaust system may lose more condition points than an aluminized system would on originality.

              Comment

              • John H.
                Beyond Control Poster
                • December 1, 1997
                • 16513

                #8
                Re: Cc's Carbon Vs. Aluminized Exhaust

                Originally posted by Terry McManmon (3966)
                I can not think of anything on a 1972 and earlier Corvette that was aluminized from St Louis).
                Terry -

                I don't have the '63-'66 Engineering specs package handy, but on 67's, the RH muffler shell and end caps were stainless steel, with an aluminized cover, and the LH muffler shell, end caps, and cover were aluminized steel. Pipes were plain steel.

                Comment

                • Stuart F.
                  Expired
                  • August 31, 1996
                  • 4676

                  #9
                  Re: Cc's Carbon Vs. Aluminized Exhaust

                  My aluminized system has been on my car now since 1992 and still looks pretty good. You can just see the beginning of some rust lines at the seams of the pipes. From behind or just a casual glance under the car it still looks super - all welded, no clamps dragging for weeds, etc.. The heat shiels were new and coated by me at that time and they still look new. BTW, I've always parked over sealed concrete or a vinyl matt. Not living in the salt up north, my main concern is for moisture under the car while parked.

                  Stu Fox

                  Comment

                  • Alan S.
                    Extremely Frequent Poster
                    • July 31, 1989
                    • 3416

                    #10
                    Re: Cc's Carbon Vs. Aluminized Exhaust

                    Hi Rich,
                    I recently put a welded aluminized system from CC on my 71. I think the aluminized system looks good on an obviously restored chassis.
                    I was actually surprised how well it fit, (it was very easy to install), and it gives a very clean look from the rear of the car. I was able to position the pipes up close to the strut-rod bracket without any problem so the pipes don't give a 'droopy' appearance.
                    I did find it's easier to do the muffler black-out before installation, rather than after.
                    Regards,
                    Alan
                    71 Coupe, 350/270, 4 speed
                    Mason Dixon Chapter
                    Chapter Top Flight October 2011

                    Comment

                    • Rich C.
                      Expired
                      • January 1, 1994
                      • 383

                      #11
                      Re: Cc's Carbon Vs. Aluminized Exhaust

                      Awesome feedback, any recommendations for blackout paint? Especially on hot mufflers!

                      '73 LS-4 454

                      Comment

                      • Edward J.
                        Extremely Frequent Poster
                        • September 15, 2008
                        • 6942

                        #12
                        Re: Cc's Carbon Vs. Aluminized Exhaust

                        Rich since the factory did a sloppy job and no two car were alike, its your call on how much ( less is better), The rear panel of muffler as did the shell bottom and sides were blacked out and threre was nothing on the pipes. Some one Terry M. or Patrick H. may be one a few that have see some original cars, I have seen some very low milage cars but the muffler are generally the first thing to go.As I am lucky to have a local chapter member with a 7to 8k (5 Star car).
                        New England chapter member, 63 Convert. 327/340- Chapter/Regional/national Top Flight, 72 coupe- chapter and regional Top Flight.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        Searching...Please wait.
                        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                        An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                        There are no results that meet this criteria.
                        Search Result for "|||"