Part of the fun of restoring one of these is learning the details (no matter your definition of restoration, ie: previous thread). At least I find it so.
To that end, my 1970 LS-5 with C60 but no N40 is missing it's '884 alternator (has aftermarket service replacement). I found one with a perfect date code (0A30 for my T0211 engine), but it has a machined pulley, P/N 3829387. The number is clearly stamped on the pulley (nice part, good patina leading me to believe it's not a fake).
My 1983 parts book claims that's for a monster '69 427 (thinking L88). The same parts book confuses the heck out of me for what my part should be. I'm learning to distrust that book (but the exploded assembly pics are good, better than most Xerox'd pics in the AIM).
Given the confusing nature of alternator pulleys in general, perhaps this is a good find? Would a judge axe the pulley because it's machined versus stamped? If it's a real part for an L88, it's an incredible find but incorrect for my car.
Thanks for any insight.
I know from searching the archives that it's not an easy detail to track.
To that end, my 1970 LS-5 with C60 but no N40 is missing it's '884 alternator (has aftermarket service replacement). I found one with a perfect date code (0A30 for my T0211 engine), but it has a machined pulley, P/N 3829387. The number is clearly stamped on the pulley (nice part, good patina leading me to believe it's not a fake).
My 1983 parts book claims that's for a monster '69 427 (thinking L88). The same parts book confuses the heck out of me for what my part should be. I'm learning to distrust that book (but the exploded assembly pics are good, better than most Xerox'd pics in the AIM).
Given the confusing nature of alternator pulleys in general, perhaps this is a good find? Would a judge axe the pulley because it's machined versus stamped? If it's a real part for an L88, it's an incredible find but incorrect for my car.
Thanks for any insight.

Comment