Well, well, well,
On the rear cover we have two of maybe six ST LOUIS FACTORY ASSEMBLY LINE BUILT SR1s, which for many years, NCRS ABSOLUTELY refused to acknowledge because they were "not" true factory built cars. Thus, John's and Larry's SR1s never received the true recognition they deserved as part of the Corvette's early performance development. But finally (and I suspect grudgingly by some nay sayers), they have been accepted into the fold of "legitimate, correct, factory built cars" (anyone remember the days of nay sayers and the Airbox cars?).
Then, on the other hand (which NCRS has always been opposed to) the installation of an engine type (LS1) into a (69) Corvette that was never built with that type of engine.
It's a real shame that the puritanical NCRS organization has finally begun to recognize and accept that there are Corvettes in this world besides exact examples of what rolled out the back door of St. Louis.
Thanks for finally getting off your high horses and smelling the roses!
On the rear cover we have two of maybe six ST LOUIS FACTORY ASSEMBLY LINE BUILT SR1s, which for many years, NCRS ABSOLUTELY refused to acknowledge because they were "not" true factory built cars. Thus, John's and Larry's SR1s never received the true recognition they deserved as part of the Corvette's early performance development. But finally (and I suspect grudgingly by some nay sayers), they have been accepted into the fold of "legitimate, correct, factory built cars" (anyone remember the days of nay sayers and the Airbox cars?).
Then, on the other hand (which NCRS has always been opposed to) the installation of an engine type (LS1) into a (69) Corvette that was never built with that type of engine.
It's a real shame that the puritanical NCRS organization has finally begun to recognize and accept that there are Corvettes in this world besides exact examples of what rolled out the back door of St. Louis.
Thanks for finally getting off your high horses and smelling the roses!
Comment