LS-1 stamped rocker in early small block - NCRS Discussion Boards

LS-1 stamped rocker in early small block

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jerry G.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • April 1, 1985
    • 1022

    LS-1 stamped rocker in early small block

    I'm in discussion with a cam supplier and in the course of discussion about stamped rocker life they suggested I switch from a standard nitrated stamped rocker to an over the GM counter LS-1 rocker. They claim its built to higher quality standards than any aftermarket rocker. This is racing applicatioin so rocker life is important. First; will an LS-1 go on an early 292 head setup and second has anyone succesfully done this?
  • Clem Z.
    Expired
    • January 1, 2006
    • 9427

    #2
    Re: LS-1 stamped rocker in early small block

    Originally posted by Jerry Gollnick (8575)
    I'm in discussion with a cam supplier and in the course of discussion about stamped rocker life they suggested I switch from a standard nitrated stamped rocker to an over the GM counter LS-1 rocker. They claim its built to higher quality standards than any aftermarket rocker. This is racing applicatioin so rocker life is important. First; will an LS-1 go on an early 292 head setup and second has anyone succesfully done this?
    LS engine rocker arms have a 1.7 rocker ratio and to use them i think you would have to move the stud location as they did using BBC rockers on SBC. why can't you use the roller rocker that were used on LT-4 engines as they were std equiptment ???

    Comment

    • Clem Z.
      Expired
      • January 1, 2006
      • 9427

      #3
      Re: LS-1 stamped rocker in early small block

      Originally posted by Clem Zahrobsky (45134)
      LS engine rocker arms have a 1.7 rocker ratio and to use them i think you would have to move the stud location as they did using BBC rockers on SBC. why can't you use the roller rocker that were used on LT-4 engines as they were std equiptment ???
      when using stamped steel rocker make sure you have plenty of oil getting to the rockers. do you see any bluing of the broken rockers as this means you need more oil to them to keep them cool because if they are getting hot they will loose strength. i would use the lightest valves you can find and use beehive type springs because they need less tension to control valve float.

      Comment

      • Jim L.
        Extremely Frequent Poster
        • September 30, 1979
        • 1808

        #4
        Re: LS-1 stamped rocker in early small block

        Originally posted by Clem Zahrobsky (45134)
        why can't you use the roller rocker that were used on LT-4 engines as they were std equiptment ???
        Jerry's racing application requires stamped rockers, per vintage rules. No roller tip rockers, no roller trunnion rockers. Just 1955-tech stamped rockers. Oh, and 7500 RPM would be nice, too.

        Jim

        Comment

        • Joe L.
          Beyond Control Poster
          • February 1, 1988
          • 43219

          #5
          Re: LS-1 stamped rocker in early small block

          Originally posted by Jim Lockwood (2750)
          Jerry's racing application requires stamped rockers, per vintage rules. No roller tip rockers, no roller trunnion rockers. Just 1955-tech stamped rockers. Oh, and 7500 RPM would be nice, too.

          Jim

          Jim------


          I can't imagine that LS-1 rocker arms would work on a Gen I or Gen II small block. But, even if they will, they are investment cast, not stamped steel, and have some sort of "roller" trunnion.
          In Appreciation of John Hinckley

          Comment

          • Jim L.
            Extremely Frequent Poster
            • September 30, 1979
            • 1808

            #6
            Re: LS-1 stamped rocker in early small block

            Originally posted by Joe Lucia (12484)
            Jim------


            I can't imagine that LS-1 rocker arms would work on a Gen I or Gen II small block. But, even if they will, they are investment cast, not stamped steel, and have some sort of "roller" trunnion.
            Thanks, Joe. I was aware that LS-7 rockers have roller trunnions, but didn't know about other LS engines. I sent Jerry a suggestion regarding a rules-compliant rocker arm that will likely survive the RPM he needs to turn.

            Jim

            Comment

            • Jerry G.
              Extremely Frequent Poster
              • April 1, 1985
              • 1022

              #7
              Re: LS-1 stamped rocker in early small block

              Originally posted by Clem Zahrobsky (45134)
              when using stamped steel rocker make sure you have plenty of oil getting to the rockers. do you see any bluing of the broken rockers as this means you need more oil to them to keep them cool because if they are getting hot they will loose strength. i would use the lightest valves you can find and use beehive type springs because they need less tension to control valve float.
              Part of my problem was self inflicted,as usual, I had restictors left in the oiling system from when it was dry sump and the lifters were a design that only oiled part time. This has been fixed and there now is plenty of oil. The other part of the problem was that I had too much lift(.610). This is the reason i'm talking to a cam supplier

              Comment

              • Duke W.
                Beyond Control Poster
                • January 1, 1993
                • 15667

                #8
                Re: LS-1 stamped rocker in early small block

                Did they by chance mean LT1 (circa 1991) rockers. Maybe they were better than previous stamped designs (?).

                The LT4 used (I think Crane) roller tip rockers.

                Duke

                Comment

                • Joe L.
                  Beyond Control Poster
                  • February 1, 1988
                  • 43219

                  #9
                  Re: LS-1 stamped rocker in early small block

                  Originally posted by Duke Williams (22045)
                  Did they by chance mean LT1 (circa 1991) rockers. Maybe they were better than previous stamped designs (?).

                  The LT4 used (I think Crane) roller tip rockers.

                  Duke
                  Duke-----


                  Yes, the 1992-96 LT1 rockers are adaptable to any Gen I small block. In fact, they were also used in PRODUCTION on 1987-91 L98 and have been SERVICE for all 1955-86 small blocks for many years. These are stamped steel rockers with GUIDED type design (tough to use on any mechanical lifter engine due to lash measuring difficulty).

                  The 1996 LT4 rockers were cast aluminum with roller tip and roller trunnion. They were manufactured by Crane.
                  In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                  Comment

                  • Jerry G.
                    Extremely Frequent Poster
                    • April 1, 1985
                    • 1022

                    #10
                    Re: LS-1 stamped rocker in early small block

                    Originally posted by Joe Lucia (12484)
                    Duke-----


                    Yes, the 1992-96 LT1 rockers are adaptable to any Gen I small block. In fact, they were also used in PRODUCTION on 1987-91 L98 and have been SERVICE for all 1955-86 small blocks for many years. These are stamped steel rockers with GUIDED type design (tough to use on any mechanical lifter engine due to lash measuring difficulty).

                    The 1996 LT4 rockers were cast aluminum with roller tip and roller trunnion. They were manufactured by Crane.
                    So for my mechanical lifter application these LT-1 would not be a good fit?? Is that correct?

                    Comment

                    • Duke W.
                      Beyond Control Poster
                      • January 1, 1993
                      • 15667

                      #11
                      Re: LS-1 stamped rocker in early small block

                      Correct. You can't use a "guided" rocker arm with mechanical lifters.

                      Given the reduced lift and required spring force, I don't think you'll have any more rocker problems.

                      The Crower catalog is on line and has spring requirements for all cams, but you can use any spring, including a beehive type, that has the same or similar specs.

                      Duke

                      Comment

                      • Joe L.
                        Beyond Control Poster
                        • February 1, 1988
                        • 43219

                        #12
                        Re: LS-1 stamped rocker in early small block

                        Originally posted by Jerry Gollnick (8575)
                        So for my mechanical lifter application these LT-1 would not be a good fit?? Is that correct?

                        Jerry------


                        In my opinion, the best rocker arms of the stock, standard stamped steel type are the Crane Nitro-Carb rockers. However, I don't know if they're part of the product line of the "New Crane" company.
                        In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        Searching...Please wait.
                        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                        An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                        There are no results that meet this criteria.
                        Search Result for "|||"