72' base engine using 6 3/4" harmonic damper - NCRS Discussion Boards

72' base engine using 6 3/4" harmonic damper

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Steven G.
    Expired
    • November 17, 2008
    • 348

    72' base engine using 6 3/4" harmonic damper

    According to the TIM & JM, 72' base engine used a 6 1/8" balancer. I have a 72', B23 with a 6 3/4" balancer, block date 1 81, has a/c, p/s, p/b, balancer date H 1 F, 2221, (rear of balancer #83766). The balancer date, H=august, 1=1971. Any input why my balancer is not according to the TIM & JM. Steve
  • Joe L.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • February 1, 1988
    • 43219

    #2
    Re: 72' base engine using 6 3/4" harmonic damper

    Originally posted by Steven Gochenour (49707)
    According to the TIM & JM, 72' base engine used a 6 1/8" balancer. I have a 72', B23 with a 6 3/4" balancer, block date 1 81, has a/c, p/s, p/b, balancer date H 1 F, 2221, (rear of balancer #83766). The balancer date, H=august, 1=1971. Any input why my balancer is not according to the TIM & JM. Steve
    Steve------



    1972 Corvettes with base engine used balancer GM #6272221 and that balancer was 6-3/4" OD. You definitely have the correct and very likely original balancer as indicated by the part number derivative (2221) and the date.

    I'd say we need to revise the Judging Guide. That's another one I missed when I reviewed the draft of the current JG. I'm ashamed of myself (again).
    In Appreciation of John Hinckley

    Comment

    • Steven G.
      Expired
      • November 17, 2008
      • 348

      #3
      Re: 72' base engine using 6 3/4" harmonic damper

      Thanks Joe, that solves the problem ! Steve

      Comment

      • Randy C.
        Expired
        • March 1, 1985
        • 154

        #4
        Re: 72' base engine using 6 3/4" harmonic damper

        Joe,
        No need to feel bad or apologize for any shortcomings of the TIM & JM. It's an evolving document that, for me, I'm just happy to have to get me steered in the right direction. The folks who have put this together have really done an outstanding job and there is a vast majority out here (including me) that greatly appreciate it!

        Best Regards,
        Randy C.

        Comment

        Working...
        Searching...Please wait.
        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
        An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
        There are no results that meet this criteria.
        Search Result for "|||"