64 ragjoint appearance - NCRS Discussion Boards

64 ragjoint appearance

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Elio D.
    Expired
    • November 22, 2010
    • 37

    64 ragjoint appearance

    Hi all, could someone tell me if this ragjoint is ok or does it need to be rebuilt. i think it,s original. it seems the upper half needs to be loosen and slide down somewhat. the rubber is in good shape . thanks Elio
    Attached Files
  • John H.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • November 30, 1997
    • 16513

    #2
    Re: 64 ragjoint appearance

    Elio -

    It appears original to me, although not correctly installed as you noted. May or may not be safe to use, depending on the condition of the carcass piece.

    Comment

    • Gary R.
      Extremely Frequent Poster
      • March 31, 1989
      • 1796

      #3
      Re: 64 ragjoint appearance

      I would check it close for any rips, it doesn't look like it was bent in installation, could be good to go. You can check it for ground with a meter.

      Comment

      • Elio D.
        Expired
        • November 22, 2010
        • 37

        #4
        Re: 64 ragjoint appearance

        John,Gary it does look to be in good shape without taking it apart,would loosening the top half of the coupler and moving it closer by about 1/4 in. making the rubber flat, so to speak,removing that bow thats there ,resolve the problem even though steering was ok.also Gary i put a meter on both sides of the couplers and didn,t get a reading.maybe the groung strap is broken or the rubber is not original as per other discussions on the forum. Elio

        Comment

        • Jim S.
          Expired
          • August 31, 2001
          • 730

          #5
          Re: 64 ragjoint appearance

          I assume that you removed the flex coupling from the car when you checked for continuity from flange to flange.

          With the flex coupling out of the car, bolt the steering column up into the dash structure. Now check for continuity from the steering column steering shaft across to the steering gear. If you have continuity, it shows that the steering shaft in your car is now grounded through the column bearings, up into the column structure, and into the dash. So a flex coupling with screen ground, (or grounding strip inside the flex coupling) is not actually required with your car. Your horn should operate correctly even with a non-conducting flexible coupling.

          BTW, the grounding strip inside the flex coupling is nearly impossible to detect with the flex coupling installed in the vehicle. With a production or service flexible coupling assembly manufactured after 1971 you can actually feel the sharp ends of the screen on a screen ground disc.

          Jim

          Comment

          • Timothy B.
            Extremely Frequent Poster
            • April 30, 1983
            • 5177

            #6
            Re: 64 ragjoint appearance

            Many times the rivet will corrode and not let the copper strap ground. I don't think a C2 horn will work if the ground through the rag is bad.

            I would like to rebuild my spare with a new flex insert because the rag on my 63 has slight movement in the flex holes where the bolts go through. Can anyone tell me about the kits available to overhaul these parts. Does the kit come with rivets and how do they look after the rebuilt. This does not seem like a hard job to do but what about installing the rivets..

            Comment

            • Jim S.
              Expired
              • August 31, 2001
              • 730

              #7
              Re: 64 ragjoint appearance

              I would think that in most older vehicles (before so many automotive parts were manufacture from plastic and other non-conducting materials) there are most likely alternate ground paths for the horn relay current once the upper horn contact is depressed.

              From all of the flexible coupling rebuild kits that I have seen, these are the major issues:

              1). All of the kits come with 4 ply rubber discs. All of the OEM Corvette flexible couplings (1963-82) came with 7 ply neoprene rubber and cotton cloth discs.

              2). Most kits come with stop pins that have shoulders and are held in place with nuts and lockwashers. Not all of the stop pin ends in length and diameter will match the OEM part (depending upon the year that is being rebuilt.) A nut and lockwasher will interfere with placing a socket on the attaching pinch bolt with the 7/16, 12 point head. I suppose that you could hot upset a threaded end of the kit stop pins, but you will have to do it fast. Otherwise you could damage the rubber disc.

              3). The rebuild kit part(s) that I have the most complaints are the attaching bolts. Every kit that I have seen comes with common 3/8 and 7/16 bolts - NOT the special shoulder bolts that are part of the OEM design.

              This can/will result in a nut and bolt attachment that can never reach the proper attaching torque and bolt stretch necessary for a critical safety connection. (If you use original OEM shoulder bolts, then this would not be an issue with me.)

              I think that Long Island Corvette is assembling flexible coupling asemblies for 1963-1967 Corvettes. I may have commented on their parts in the past but I can't seem to find them at this time.



              Also from my notes, you might contact Alan at Duntov Motor Company in Farmers Branch, Texas. They list the following Corvette assemblies:
              63-66 Std S034
              65-66 Tele S036
              67-68 All S032
              69-82 All S030
              Again, I can't find any comments on these assemblies. (They may be GM service parts - I just don't know.)

              I would be interested in your comments as to what you find.

              Jim

              Comment

              • Elio D.
                Expired
                • November 22, 2010
                • 37

                #8
                Re: 64 ragjoint appearance

                Good morning guy,s, my ground and horn are ok ,i like to know if i should leave the rubber as is or slide the top half of the couple down to remove the bend in the rubber. thanks Elio

                Comment

                • Gary R.
                  Extremely Frequent Poster
                  • March 31, 1989
                  • 1796

                  #9
                  Re: 64 ragjoint appearance

                  If you need/want to have your original rag rebuilt the only guy on the planet I would use is Tom at Corvette Steering in SC.

                  Comment

                  • Jim S.
                    Expired
                    • August 31, 2001
                    • 730

                    #10
                    Re: 64 ragjoint appearance

                    Gary,
                    I didn't realize that Corvette Steering Services overhauled flexible coupling assemblies.

                    I will add them to my list.

                    Jim
                    Last edited by Jim S.; April 10, 2011, 11:21 AM.

                    Comment

                    • Gary R.
                      Extremely Frequent Poster
                      • March 31, 1989
                      • 1796

                      #11
                      Re: 64 ragjoint appearance

                      Jim
                      Tom was the guy supplying a lot of vendors. How much he's going to still do I can't say but it's worth a call to find out.

                      Comment

                      • John H.
                        Beyond Control Poster
                        • November 30, 1997
                        • 16513

                        #12
                        Re: 64 ragjoint appearance

                        Here's what the new '63-'66 couplings look like from LICS.
                        Attached Files

                        Comment

                        • Joe R.
                          Extremely Frequent Poster
                          • July 31, 1976
                          • 4547

                          #13
                          Re: 64 ragjoint appearance

                          You mean Saginaw don't you? Hint! Hint!

                          JR

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          Searching...Please wait.
                          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                          An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                          There are no results that meet this criteria.
                          Search Result for "|||"