Trying to prove to a dealer that a 67 BB is not original... help please - NCRS Discussion Boards

Trying to prove to a dealer that a 67 BB is not original... help please

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jacob A.
    Very Frequent User
    • December 1, 2003
    • 237

    #16
    Re: Trying to prove to a dealer that a 67 BB is not original... help please

    Thanks Guys!

    I in NO WAY want to buy, or am interested in this corvette.

    I was just trying to keep someone from getting the wool from being pulled over their eyes.

    I think I might just forward this link to him, since he just e-mailed me to tell that his Corvette expert claims that this is one of the 10 percent of original BB cars from a.o.'smith! Likely story indeed!

    Again thanks everyone!!! I can always count on the ncrs board to help me out!

    You guys ROCK!!!
    Best, Jacob

    Comment

    • Richard M.
      Super Moderator
      • August 31, 1988
      • 11323

      #17
      Re: Trying to prove to a dealer that a 67 BB is not original... help please

      Jacob,

      Your intentions are honorable, but......

      .....in my opinion it may be best just to leave it be. If you forward this to them they'll probably just delete it from their mailbox. If you push hard it could backfire in some way. You never know how some of these people react. They really don't want to know. They have it in their mind it's the real deal. Maybe they bought it thinking it really is. Maybe they should have hired a expert themselves to inspect the car before they got it in. They are in the business to make money.

      Someone, somewhere, is going to buy this car. There are probably scores of made-up counterfeit cars out there and it is up to any potential buyer to do their homework to protect themselves.

      Again, your trying to protect someone from getting burned, and you have in fact done that right here. The word will likely get around. Thankfully we have the internet and anyone thinking about that car can just google it up and likely find this thread.

      Rich

      Comment

      • Michael W.
        Expired
        • April 1, 1997
        • 4290

        #18
        Re: Trying to prove to a dealer that a 67 BB is not original... help please

        Originally posted by Richard Mozzetta (13499)

        Again, your trying to protect someone from getting burned, and you have in fact done that right here. The word will likely get around. Thankfully we have the internet and anyone thinking about that car can just google it up and likely find this thread.

        Rich
        Unfortunately no. Private sites that require a userID and password don't get picked up by Google.

        Comment

        • Jacob A.
          Very Frequent User
          • December 1, 2003
          • 237

          #19
          Re: Trying to prove to a dealer that a 67 BB is not original... help please

          Again thanks to you all for your input, advice, and just awesome wealth of knowledge!

          There is sooo much to learn from you all, I appreciate you all taking the time to teach Corvette!

          Very best, Jacob

          Comment

          • Ronald L.
            Extremely Frequent Poster
            • October 18, 2009
            • 3248

            #20
            Re: Trying to prove to a dealer that a 67 BB is not original... help please

            Jacob, did you buddy buy this car after all?

            Comment

            • Patrick T.
              Expired
              • September 30, 1999
              • 1286

              #21
              Re: Trying to prove to a dealer that a 67 BB is not original... help please

              Looks like they yanked the ad and reposted it. Is this the same car?



              Isn't the battery supposed to be on the driver's side?

              Comment

              • Jacob A.
                Very Frequent User
                • December 1, 2003
                • 237

                #22
                Re: Trying to prove to a dealer that a 67 BB is not original... help please

                Hi,

                The Corvette is still for sale. They dropped the price, and still claim it to be original.

                I hope nobody gets the wool pulled over their eyes with the purchase of this Corvette.

                Very Best,
                Jacob

                Comment

                • Ronald L.
                  Extremely Frequent Poster
                  • October 18, 2009
                  • 3248

                  #23
                  Re: Trying to prove to a dealer that a 67 BB is not original... help please

                  Patrick - That's the 66 BB part of the car (battery tray)

                  Comment

                  • Jacob A.
                    Very Frequent User
                    • December 1, 2003
                    • 237

                    #24
                    Re: Trying to prove to a dealer that a 67 BB is not original... help please

                    Funny, I just re-read this entire thread, and it looks like they pulled part of their ad right from this thread....

                    they have this EXACT quote below on the for sale ad, and it even has the same incorrect use of the word ever instead of never!

                    "According to Corvette Enthusiast Magazine ( volume 9 / issue 6 ) June 2006. A "few" big block 1967 Corvettes were built at Ionia Manufacturing Company (A.O. Smith). Same article does say that NO RPO-14 side exhausts specifying sidepipes were ever allocated to A.O.Smith. All Bodies for sidepipe-equipped Corvettes were build at St. Louis. So big block Corvette yes, sidepipes no. Sidepipes could have been installed at a later date by some pervious owner or dealer."

                    I never told them about this thread.

                    Best,
                    Jacob
                    by the way, Patrick I believe all 67 435's had the battery mounted on the passenger side, That's where the battery to my 67 435 is located, and my car is WITHOUT QUESTION an original 435.

                    Comment

                    • Patrick T.
                      Expired
                      • September 30, 1999
                      • 1286

                      #25
                      Re: Trying to prove to a dealer that a 67 BB is not original... help please

                      Originally posted by Jacob Angel (40987)
                      by the way, Patrick I believe all 67 435's had the battery mounted on the passenger side, That's where the battery to my 67 435 is located, and my car is WITHOUT QUESTION an original 435.
                      Jacob, yeah I didn't realize this thread was started back on April 5th until just now. I have a '67 L-79 and if they could put a battery door on the inner fender of the big blocks for ease of removal, why couldn't the bums put that door on the small blocks as well?

                      Comment

                      • Gary C.
                        Very Frequent User
                        • April 1, 1998
                        • 376

                        #26
                        Re: Trying to prove to a dealer that a 67 BB is not original... help please

                        No spare!

                        Comment

                        • Larry M.
                          Expired
                          • December 1, 1986
                          • 541

                          #27
                          Re: Trying to prove to a dealer that a 67 BB is not original... help please

                          I'm not that familiar with the underside texture of mid-year hoods, but on this one, it looks a little too rough and uneven to be press-molded. Or is that the normal appearance?

                          Comment

                          • Norris W.
                            Very Frequent User
                            • December 1, 1982
                            • 683

                            #28
                            Re: Trying to prove to a dealer that a 67 BB is not original... help please

                            Originally posted by Patrick Tighe (33001)
                            ................I have a '67 L-79 and if they could put a battery door on the inner fender of the big blocks for ease of removal, why couldn't the bums put that door on the small blocks as well?
                            But the '67 big blocks don't have a battery door on the inner fender.

                            My '65 L79 air coupe has a door on the inner fender left side for battery removal, but it's anything but easy. Gettin' the battery out of one of the '67 BB cars is a cakewalk by comparison.

                            Comment

                            • Michael H.
                              Expired
                              • January 29, 2008
                              • 7477

                              #29
                              Re: Trying to prove to a dealer that a 67 BB is not original... help please

                              Originally posted by Patrick Tighe (33001)
                              Looks like they yanked the ad and reposted it. Is this the same car?



                              Isn't the battery supposed to be on the driver's side?


                              Absence of holes in the fender skirt for the heater hose bracket used on big block?

                              Comment

                              • Gerard F.
                                Extremely Frequent Poster
                                • June 30, 2004
                                • 3805

                                #30
                                Re: Trying to prove to a dealer that a 67 BB is not original... help please

                                Originally posted by Gary Cowans (30373)
                                No spare!
                                Isn't there suppost to be a rear stabilizer on a big block, or am I missing it
                                Jerry Fuccillo
                                1967 327/300 Convertible since 1968

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                Searching...Please wait.
                                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                                An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                                There are no results that meet this criteria.
                                Search Result for "|||"