Reproduction 1115355 vacuum adv. - NCRS Discussion Boards

Reproduction 1115355 vacuum adv.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Larry M.
    Expired
    • March 1, 2002
    • 62

    Reproduction 1115355 vacuum adv.

    I want to change the vacuum advance on my 66 327-300hp powerglide. I see LIC and Paragon sell a reproduction 1115355. Has anyone purchased this item and are there any problems with them? Thanks for any info. Larry....
  • Duke W.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • January 1, 1993
    • 15673

    #2
    Re: Reproduction 1115355 vacuum adv.

    There have been a number of reports that "reproduction" VACs don't met the OE specs for the part number. I'm not sure about this repro of the 355, but you should ask the for the specs and get a guarantee that they are correct.

    Approximately 0 @ 8", 16 deg. (crankshaft) at 12". (And these specs are well "tuned" to a 300HP/PG. For a 300 HP/manual trans I recommend the B22 which is 0 @ 8, 16 @ 15")

    You can buy a B20/B26, which has these specs for about ten bucks. The VAC is worth three points - two for originality and one for condition. IMO a B20 or B26 VAC is a one point deduction.

    So, is it worth the risk and cost for one point?

    Duke

    Comment

    • Edward J.
      Extremely Frequent Poster
      • September 15, 2008
      • 6942

      #3
      Re: Reproduction 1115355 vacuum adv.

      Duke, talking about vacuum advance canisters, could you give me the spec. on my 63 327/340 corvette, I will be starting up the rebuilt engine this week, I did stay with the stock compression and camshaft profile.I believe that the vac. canister is the factory, and did at least test vacuum dia. for operation after I cleaned and lubed the bushings and tach drive gears.

      Or should I consider a different vacuum canister for running ethonal gas?
      Last edited by Edward J.; March 30, 2011, 06:46 PM.
      New England chapter member, 63 Convert. 327/340- Chapter/Regional/national Top Flight, 72 coupe- chapter and regional Top Flight.

      Comment

      • Dan H.
        Extremely Frequent Poster
        • July 31, 1977
        • 1369

        #4
        Re: Reproduction 1115355 vacuum adv.

        Be careful with the repro VAC's. I had a '236' one that didn't quite match the designed vacuum specs. After about 2K miles it ruptured the diaphram. Luckily I was home when it went out. Have a couple nice NOS ones now, never a problem anymore.
        Dan
        Last edited by Dan H.; March 30, 2011, 08:27 PM.
        1964 Red FI Coupe, DUNTOV '09
        Drove the 64 over 5000 miles to three Regionals and the San Jose National, one dust storm and 40 lbs of bugs!

        Comment

        • Gene M.
          Extremely Frequent Poster
          • April 1, 1985
          • 4232

          #5
          Re: Reproduction 1115355 vacuum adv.

          [QUOTE=Duke Williams (22045);............. The VAC is worth three points - two for originality and one for condition. IMO a B20 or B26 VAC is a one point deduction.

          So, is it worth the risk and cost for one point?

          Duke[/QUOTE]

          I think you will find that the number stampings are incorrect and no part number derivative as well as the front face stamping configuration is wrong. With that much wrong might as well find one of the old Crane adjustible vacuum canister and be able to dial it in.

          Comment

          • Ronald L.
            Extremely Frequent Poster
            • October 18, 2009
            • 3248

            #6
            Re: Reproduction 1115355 vacuum adv.

            I got one last summer, unless you have a microscope you can't tell the difference - and - it works just fine.

            I would expect they are all coming from one place, LIC has them made if I remember correctly.

            Comment

            • William C.
              NCRS Past President
              • May 31, 1975
              • 6037

              #7
              Re: Reproduction 1115355 vacuum adv.

              I've had a number of the reproductions on my machine from various folks, and some are OK and some are WAY off. Particularly troublesome on the SHP engines that don't pull much vacuum at idle. Fixed a couple of engines that would not idle with a good vac. can.
              Bill Clupper #618

              Comment

              • Duke W.
                Beyond Control Poster
                • January 1, 1993
                • 15673

                #8
                Re: Reproduction 1115355 vacuum adv.

                Originally posted by Edward Johnson (49497)
                Duke, talking about vacuum advance canisters, could you give me the spec. on my 63 327/340 corvette, I will be starting up the rebuilt engine this week, I did stay with the stock compression and camshaft profile.I believe that the vac. canister is the factory, and did at least test vacuum dia. for operation after I cleaned and lubed the bushings and tach drive gears.

                Or should I consider a different vacuum canister for running ethonal gas?
                I've stated many, many times before that the OE '63 340 HP VAC is not properly matched to the engine's idle vacuum characteristics. The OE 201 15 is 0@8", 15 @15.5", but the Duntov cam only pulls 12" at idle so it doesn't meet the Two-Inch Rule. I figured this out and replaced my OE 201 15 with a 236 16 in 1965, which solved the chronic idle instability problems.

                The modern OE replacment equivalent to the 236 16 is the B28, but I understand they are getting hard to find. Some who have purchased recently may be able to give you a source.

                As long as you're rebuilding your 327/340 why not massage the heads and install a LT-1 cam. It idles the same at a Duntov cam, but you will have useable power to 7000+.

                And don't forget to replace the weak OE rods with something better.

                Do some archive searching for more info.

                Duke

                Comment

                • Duke W.
                  Beyond Control Poster
                  • January 1, 1993
                  • 15673

                  #9
                  Re: Reproduction 1115355 vacuum adv.

                  Originally posted by Dan Holstein (1440)
                  Be careful with the repro VAC's. I had a '326' one that didn't quite match the designed vacuum specs. After about 2K miles it ruptured the diaphram. Luckily I was home when it went out. Have a couple nice NOS ones now, never a problem anymore.
                  Dan
                  I think you mean a "236".

                  Duke

                  Comment

                  • Duke W.
                    Beyond Control Poster
                    • January 1, 1993
                    • 15673

                    #10
                    Re: Reproduction 1115355 vacuum adv.

                    Originally posted by Gene Manno (8571)
                    I think you will find that the number stampings are incorrect and no part number derivative as well as the front face stamping configuration is wrong. With that much wrong might as well find one of the old Crane adjustible vacuum canister and be able to dial it in.
                    The current "B-series" VACs that are made by SMP and sold by all the brands including Delco at least have the same dimensional geometry as the OE VACs even though some of the construction details may be different.

                    I don't think most of the aftermarket adjustable VACs even look remotely similar, so I would take a full deduction - two for originality, which means none for condition.

                    There's no reason not to install a B-series VAC. There is one of only a universe of THREE that is properly matched to any OE pre-emission engine, and those same three are applicable to any OE engine that is converted from ported to full time vacuum advance. I've posted the list, here, several times.

                    If one has an aftermarket cam in place of OE - just use the Two-Inch Rule.

                    Adjustable VACs are for people who don't understand the single simple fact required to select a proper VAC, and it's been discussed enough, here, that everyone should know how to do it or search for the answer.

                    Duke

                    Comment

                    • Duke W.
                      Beyond Control Poster
                      • January 1, 1993
                      • 15673

                      #11
                      Re: Reproduction 1115355 vacuum adv.

                      Originally posted by Ronald Lovelace (50931)
                      I got one last summer, unless you have a microscope you can't tell the difference - and - it works just fine.

                      I would expect they are all coming from one place, LIC has them made if I remember correctly.
                      Did you actually test it to determine if it meets the 355 spec?

                      If not, how do you know it works "fine".

                      Duke

                      Comment

                      • Dan H.
                        Extremely Frequent Poster
                        • July 31, 1977
                        • 1369

                        #12
                        Re: Reproduction 1115355 vacuum adv.

                        Originally posted by Duke Williams (22045)
                        I think you mean a "236".

                        Duke
                        OOPS, that's the one Duke!
                        1964 Red FI Coupe, DUNTOV '09
                        Drove the 64 over 5000 miles to three Regionals and the San Jose National, one dust storm and 40 lbs of bugs!

                        Comment

                        • Michael H.
                          Expired
                          • January 29, 2008
                          • 7477

                          #13
                          Re: Reproduction 1115355 vacuum adv.

                          Originally posted by Duke Williams (22045)
                          As long as you're rebuilding your 327/340 why not massage the heads and install a LT-1 cam. It idles the same at a Duntov cam, but you will have useable power to 7000+.


                          Duke
                          Oh, here we go again.

                          Comment

                          • Jim T.
                            Expired
                            • March 1, 1993
                            • 5351

                            #14
                            Re: Reproduction 1115355 vacuum adv.

                            Duke I still have the original vacuum advance unit in my 68 327/350 L79. Removed the distributor to install new lubricant in the upper cavity of the distributor.
                            When the distributor was left laying on it's side oil drained from the vacuum cannister.
                            Have no idea of how the oil got there. Any ideas or knowledge of this occurance.

                            Comment

                            • Duke W.
                              Beyond Control Poster
                              • January 1, 1993
                              • 15673

                              #15
                              Re: Reproduction 1115355 vacuum adv.

                              The only thing I can figure is that some oil ingested from the PCV system found its way into the VAC, or it could be some of the heaviest components from fuel, which can look like oil.

                              I'm not sure how resistant the VAC diaphragm is to petroleum compounds. I know some rubber parts in brake vacuum boosters can fail due to oil contamination. In the mid seventies, GM added a small activated charcoal filter to most power brake supply hoses to absorb hydrocarbons. It's about the size of the small cannister filter (GF90 I think) that was used on '63 300/340/360 HP engines.

                              BTW, the OE 236 16 VAC on L-79s is more aggressive than necessary. I recommend replacement with the 12" B20 or B26. Since the L-79 typically pulls about 14" manifold vacuum at 750 RPM idle, a 12" VAC meets the Two-Inch Rule.

                              I recommend you check that OE VAC with a Mighty Vac to see if it holds vacuum

                              Duke

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              Searching...Please wait.
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                              There are no results that meet this criteria.
                              Search Result for "|||"