1966 lug wrench

[Gary B.]

1966 tire hammer

It's not just a matter of the number of holes in the handle...read the text of what Noland Adams wrote, look at the drawings and you'll see it's a larger issue.

Maybe so, Jack. But I'm a believer in one thing at a time.

Gary

[Mark G.]

Re: 1966 lug wrench

This is what I have. Is Corvette the only application?

[Joe L.]

Re: 1966 lug wrench

This is what I have. Is Corvette the only application?

Mark------


As far as I have been able to determine, Corvette is the only application for this wrench or its successor.

[Jim D.]

Re: 1966 lug wrench

David,

No, that's definitely ot the case. But someone has to take the lead, assemble evidence, contact the revision team, etc. But nothing will changed if we just make repeated posts to the BD.

Gary

That has been done on issues with the 65 JG and has fallen on deaf ears and the inaccuracies remain. Personally, I don't care what the JG says as I know what is original to my car, whether they like it or not.

[Ronald L.]

Re: 1966 lug wrench

Jim,
That is the way you have to keep it! Eventually things will change - eventually.

[Gary B.]

Re: 1966 lug wrench

That has been done on issues with the 65 JG and has fallen on deaf ears and the inaccuracies remain. Personally, I don't care what the JG says as I know what is original to my car, whether they like it or not.

Jim,

I'm convinced that corrections can be made, since I've seen it done. Brake caliper numbers have been corrected in the latest '66 TIM&JG, and the number of V belts has been corrected. I'm sure there are other items I don't know about. It can be done. It takes sound evidence and following through with the process, but it is definitely doable.

Gary

[William C.]

Re: 1966 lug wrench

Ok guys, each judging team has a team leader, and the team leader and his contact info is listed on this website. I know almost all of them and with a couple of exceptions they are pretty reasonable fellows who usually have Job and other obligations outside of the hobby. The approach is generally to catalog info for changes as such until a decision is made to revise and issue an entire manual. If any of you feel you have an issue with being ignored, I'd suggest you discuss it directly with the appropriate team leader for your division, and if you don't get satisfaction there, contact Roy Sinor for Guidance. There is little to be gained by complaining here.

[Peter L.]

Re: 1966 lug wrench

Bill - Infinite wisdom Pete