in response to the closed thread "inconsistant judging"
I just noticed the thread was closed. I have no idea why it was closed, but it is:
It was in fact, a fascinating thread with over 3,100 separate member's views. I thank Leonard for starting this thread, sharing what clearly are his heartfelt concerns, and giving us all another glimpse into the heartbeat of the current club make-up. I hope he feels like he got some concerns answered.
Threads like this can in fact change the very course of a car enthusiast club. I've watched firsthand as the national Chevelle clubs have changed course (partly due to their watching of the NCRS)
I appreciated every member who participated in expressing their viewpoints, sharing their experiences, and showing their true feelings. I salute once again those who actually judge on the front-lines, .... for helping us all learn just a little more of their perspective. I thank our national judging chairman for once again giving his viewpoint, as his vantage point and field of vision, is more encompassing than most of ours. I likewise once again express my sincere appreciate for the army of volunteers that so graciously give of them time to our fine organization. Thanks are sometimes expressed in these threads, but never quite enough. That is the true backbone of this club. The generosity of those who volunteer, without compensation.
I had wished that NCRS President Vito Cimilluca had shared his viewpoint on this issue. I realize our president is extremely busy. Sadly, the technical discussion board only heard from our president via postings four times during the past year (excluding official announcements on sticky threads).
Our club is growing, and the average age of it's membership is clearly dropping. We're now moving into the computer age at a pretty fair clip.
I stated recently, that I have a distinct feeling that many members desire some changes. As one of the newer members, I for one support those who insist of preserving the integrity of the awards.
Many other issues, should be openly discussed with those who kindly serve the membership on the board.
I would urge more communication from that board, including the NCRS President.
I have personally telephoned my regional director, and have had a very good conversation. While we disagreed a few issues, we agreed on many, many more.
I attempted to engage this same conservation with NCRS President Cimilluca, but our busy family schedules caused us to miss each others repeated calls. Vito made multiple attempts to return my calls (three or four). More members need ot open constructive and courteous dialogue. Not name calling or labels, ......constructive lines of communication. We're all adults (except for one or two youngsters that I'm very happy they hold membership numbers).
We've grown, but we've also lost some of our most brilliant minds in these past few years. Have we pondered why.....?
Lastly, I would urge the 2011 board to become more engaged in the TDB. Although it's mission clearly is discussions of a technical nature regarding these cars we all love, ....often the direction of the club is discussed. I don't know of one single member among the 15,000+ of us, who prefers the board's silence on issues.
Ridge Kayser (45955)
It was in fact, a fascinating thread with over 3,100 separate member's views. I thank Leonard for starting this thread, sharing what clearly are his heartfelt concerns, and giving us all another glimpse into the heartbeat of the current club make-up. I hope he feels like he got some concerns answered.
Threads like this can in fact change the very course of a car enthusiast club. I've watched firsthand as the national Chevelle clubs have changed course (partly due to their watching of the NCRS)
I appreciated every member who participated in expressing their viewpoints, sharing their experiences, and showing their true feelings. I salute once again those who actually judge on the front-lines, .... for helping us all learn just a little more of their perspective. I thank our national judging chairman for once again giving his viewpoint, as his vantage point and field of vision, is more encompassing than most of ours. I likewise once again express my sincere appreciate for the army of volunteers that so graciously give of them time to our fine organization. Thanks are sometimes expressed in these threads, but never quite enough. That is the true backbone of this club. The generosity of those who volunteer, without compensation.
I had wished that NCRS President Vito Cimilluca had shared his viewpoint on this issue. I realize our president is extremely busy. Sadly, the technical discussion board only heard from our president via postings four times during the past year (excluding official announcements on sticky threads).
Our club is growing, and the average age of it's membership is clearly dropping. We're now moving into the computer age at a pretty fair clip.
I stated recently, that I have a distinct feeling that many members desire some changes. As one of the newer members, I for one support those who insist of preserving the integrity of the awards.
Many other issues, should be openly discussed with those who kindly serve the membership on the board.
I would urge more communication from that board, including the NCRS President.
I have personally telephoned my regional director, and have had a very good conversation. While we disagreed a few issues, we agreed on many, many more.
I attempted to engage this same conservation with NCRS President Cimilluca, but our busy family schedules caused us to miss each others repeated calls. Vito made multiple attempts to return my calls (three or four). More members need ot open constructive and courteous dialogue. Not name calling or labels, ......constructive lines of communication. We're all adults (except for one or two youngsters that I'm very happy they hold membership numbers).
We've grown, but we've also lost some of our most brilliant minds in these past few years. Have we pondered why.....?
Lastly, I would urge the 2011 board to become more engaged in the TDB. Although it's mission clearly is discussions of a technical nature regarding these cars we all love, ....often the direction of the club is discussed. I don't know of one single member among the 15,000+ of us, who prefers the board's silence on issues.
Ridge Kayser (45955)
Comment