Jack Identification - NCRS Discussion Boards

Jack Identification

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Clark K.
    Expired
    • January 12, 2009
    • 536

    Jack Identification

    Two years ago when I bought my '65 Sting Ray from ProTeam, I got a jack that didn't really fit into the well behind the seats. It was a bit too long.
    At the last Texas Regional, I was told that the jack was incorrect for a '65 model. I then bought a reproduction from Long Island Corvette Supply.

    But, I have been wondering what type or what year of jack the incorrect one is, the one that was in my car. I have attached a photo of this jack. The label on the jack shows "GR.8.820 Jack" and "1 #3958710".

    I am betting that there are jack experts in NCRS that can tell me what jack this is and perhaps why it was in my car. -Clark
    Attached Files
  • Joe L.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • February 1, 1988
    • 43219

    #2
    Re: Jack Identification

    Originally posted by Clark Kirby (49862)
    Two years ago when I bought my '65 Sting Ray from ProTeam, I got a jack that didn't really fit into the well behind the seats. It was a bit too long.
    At the last Texas Regional, I was told that the jack was incorrect for a '65 model. I then bought a reproduction from Long Island Corvette Supply.

    But, I have been wondering what type or what year of jack the incorrect one is, the one that was in my car. I have attached a photo of this jack. The label on the jack shows "GR.8.820 Jack" and "1 #3958710".


    I am betting that there are jack experts in NCRS that can tell me what jack this is and perhaps why it was in my car. -Clark
    Clark------


    With the label it's especially easy to identify. This particular jack is a SERVICE jack but the same jack was used in PRODUCTION from 1969 through about 1981. There should be a date code stamped on it that will identify exactly when it was manufactured. From 1969 to 1982, GM used this jack to SERVICE all 1953-68 Corvettes. So, if one had gone to a GM dealer during the 1969-82 period and asked for a jack to replace one's 1953-68 jack, this is the one that would have been supplied.
    In Appreciation of John Hinckley

    Comment

    • Clark K.
      Expired
      • January 12, 2009
      • 536

      #3
      Re: Jack Identification

      Joe, thanks for the quick response. After reading your post, I walked back out to the garage and looked at that jack. The only thing I could find that might be a date code is a stamping: "K4". Can you tell me what this means, if it is the date code? Also, would this jack have any value to another Corvette owner? -Clark

      Comment

      • Tom H.
        Extremely Frequent Poster
        • December 1, 1993
        • 3440

        #4
        Re: Jack Identification

        Clark:

        You can get some idea of at least what somebody thinks this jack is worth. Keep an eye on this one and you can see if it sells or not. My guess is opening bid is a bit more than what it's worth.

        Tom Hendricks
        Proud Member NCRS #23758
        NCM Founding Member # 1143
        Corvette Department Manager and
        Specialist for 27 years at BUDS Chevrolet.

        Comment

        • Edward J.
          Extremely Frequent Poster
          • September 15, 2008
          • 6941

          #5
          Re: Jack Identification

          Originally posted by Clark Kirby (49862)
          Joe, thanks for the quick response. After reading your post, I walked back out to the garage and looked at that jack. The only thing I could find that might be a date code is a stamping: "K4". Can you tell me what this means, if it is the date code? Also, would this jack have any value to another Corvette owner? -Clark

          Kirby, That letter and number I think is nov. 74?
          New England chapter member, 63 Convert. 327/340- Chapter/Regional/national Top Flight, 72 coupe- chapter and regional Top Flight.

          Comment

          • Joe L.
            Beyond Control Poster
            • February 1, 1988
            • 43219

            #6
            Re: Jack Identification

            Originally posted by Tom Hendricks (23758)
            Clark:

            You can get some idea of at least what somebody thinks this jack is worth. Keep an eye on this one and you can see if it sells or not. My guess is opening bid is a bit more than what it's worth.

            http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/GM-NO...-/280572503542
            Tom------


            Yes, these jacks are not rare. A lot of 1969-81 Corvettes were built with them and a lot of those cars are "no longer with us". So, all have contributed a jack to the used parts "emporium".
            In Appreciation of John Hinckley

            Comment

            • Joe L.
              Beyond Control Poster
              • February 1, 1988
              • 43219

              #7
              Re: Jack Identification

              Originally posted by Clark Kirby (49862)
              Joe, thanks for the quick response. After reading your post, I walked back out to the garage and looked at that jack. The only thing I could find that might be a date code is a stamping: "K4". Can you tell me what this means, if it is the date code? Also, would this jack have any value to another Corvette owner? -Clark
              Clark----


              As Edward mentions, it's November, 1974 (might be December if an "I" was used, but I don't think it was). The "4" has to represent 1974 since this jack was not invented yet in 1964 and was out-of-production by 1984.
              In Appreciation of John Hinckley

              Comment

              • Terry M.
                Beyond Control Poster
                • September 30, 1980
                • 15599

                #8
                Re: Jack Identification

                My January 1970 Jack is M9 = December 1969. So how does K = November? Of course There is a chance 1974 dating is different than 1969, although I don't know why that would be.

                Another point: I once noticed that sometime in the later 1970s -- that is after 1972 -- the size of the date font got larger than it was from 1967 to 1972. How much larger? I haven't a clue. I didn't have my handy pocket ruler with me at the time.
                Terry

                Comment

                • Joe L.
                  Beyond Control Poster
                  • February 1, 1988
                  • 43219

                  #9
                  Re: Jack Identification

                  Originally posted by Terry McManmon (3966)
                  My January 1970 Jack is M9 = December 1969. So how does K = November? Of course There is a chance 1974 dating is different than 1969, although I don't know why that would be.

                  Another point: I once noticed that sometime in the later 1970s -- that is after 1972 -- the size of the date font got larger than it was from 1967 to 1972. How much larger? I haven't a clue. I didn't have my handy pocket ruler with me at the time.
                  Terry------


                  In that case, the jacks must not have used the normal alpha numeric date coding system for stamped date codes. I thought they did use the standard system.
                  In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                  Comment

                  • Terry M.
                    Beyond Control Poster
                    • September 30, 1980
                    • 15599

                    #10
                    Re: Jack Identification

                    Maybe no I and no L??

                    I don't know either, but the picture of the jack in both the 1969 and 1970 TIM&JGs is the one from my car -- taken by John Amgwert many moons ago. John did a story about the jack dating system in The Corvette Restorer back about 1985 or 1986 and illustrated it with that photo as well. That photo has been in the TIM&JG since 1993.

                    Edit add: It won't let me post the picture again, but see post number 10 in this thread:

                    https://www.forums.ncrs.org/showthre...66745&uid=7450

                    Someone also talks about an L in this thread, so that idea is out the window.
                    Last edited by Terry M.; October 11, 2010, 09:05 PM.
                    Terry

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    Searching...Please wait.
                    An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                    Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                    An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                    Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                    An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                    There are no results that meet this criteria.
                    Search Result for "|||"