c1 rear main seal - NCRS Discussion Boards

c1 rear main seal

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Thomas G.
    Expired
    • February 1, 1989
    • 37

    c1 rear main seal

    My 56 motor was rebuilt using a new rope seal. It leaked a small amount during break in and has not been run since. While I have the pan off now, I was planning to replace the rope seal with the Paragon 56 seal. After removing the rear main cap I discovered the crank is pitted in the seal area. I'm afraid to install the new neoprene seal for fear it will leak more than the rope. I'm thinking that the rope might be better since it has more surface area. HELP!

    Has anyone installed a double lip seal designed for later blocks in a 56 by modifying the seal to fit the v-shaped goove?

    Thanks for any responses.

    Tom
  • Joe L.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • February 1, 1988
    • 43212

    #2
    Re: c1 rear main seal

    Originally posted by Thomas Grieco (14571)
    My 56 motor was rebuilt using a new rope seal. It leaked a small amount during break in and has not been run since. While I have the pan off now, I was planning to replace the rope seal with the Paragon 56 seal. After removing the rear main cap I discovered the crank is pitted in the seal area. I'm afraid to install the new neoprene seal for fear it will leak more than the rope. I'm thinking that the rope might be better since it has more surface area. HELP!

    Has anyone installed a double lip seal designed for later blocks in a 56 by modifying the seal to fit the v-shaped goove?

    Thanks for any responses.

    Tom
    Tom-----


    I agree with you. As bad as the rope seals are, I think they would work better than a neoprene lip seal in the case of the damaged crank as you describe. However, a lot depends on just how and where the crank is damaged. If it's damaged across most of the seal surface from front to rear, I think you're better off with the rope seal. However, if the area where the lip of the neoprene seal would contact the seal surface through 360 degrees is ok, then the lip seal should work fine. You only need a very narrow "band" of good surface through 360 degrees for the lip seal to work properly. With a lip seal, though, if the lip contacts any part of the damaged area, the seal will be quickly destroyed and the leak will go from bad to worse.

    If the crankshaft's seal surface is damaged so that the neoprene seal won't work, then I think you're going to have to be satisfied with whatever leak you get with the rope seal on the damaged surface.
    In Appreciation of John Hinckley

    Comment

    Working...
    Searching...Please wait.
    An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

    Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
    An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

    Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
    An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
    There are no results that meet this criteria.
    Search Result for "|||"