My '64 built 3rd week of Nov 63 has a 1970 rear end in it. The rear end is shot and I can barely turn the vehicle, so I have to rebuild. I thought it might be good to get a properly dated rear end. I know the part number is supposed to be 3818753-N, and as a 3.08 it should be stamped CJ and then have the axle assembly date.
I have read several sources stating that the axle assembly date usually predates the vehicle assembly date by 1-2 months. However, if I look at the Noland Adams survey data in his book, there is a date stamp of 10 31 63 being used in vehicle 104348 (nearly 1100 before my car-probably an end of first week of November car build date), and then an axle built on 12 26 63 went into car 108477.
Given the data points above, this would suggest that for my vehicle, with a build date of 3rd week of November, I would need a 2nd week of November axle assembly date -- and that is a lot different than the guidance being provided in a few restoration guides (survey suggests it's 1-2 weeks not 1-2 months).
Is it possible that St. Louis was not consistently using their assembled axles in a FIFO or LIFO basis, causing severe sequence/date skewing, or is it my brain that is skewed? I know this request may seem overboard since these numbers aren't even judged, but I thought I have to go through all this work to drop the rear end, might as well get the right rear end back into the car.
Thanks in advance for any advice or guidance. I'm a big boy, so you can tell me if I'm crazy...it won't be the first time.
I have read several sources stating that the axle assembly date usually predates the vehicle assembly date by 1-2 months. However, if I look at the Noland Adams survey data in his book, there is a date stamp of 10 31 63 being used in vehicle 104348 (nearly 1100 before my car-probably an end of first week of November car build date), and then an axle built on 12 26 63 went into car 108477.
Given the data points above, this would suggest that for my vehicle, with a build date of 3rd week of November, I would need a 2nd week of November axle assembly date -- and that is a lot different than the guidance being provided in a few restoration guides (survey suggests it's 1-2 weeks not 1-2 months).
Is it possible that St. Louis was not consistently using their assembled axles in a FIFO or LIFO basis, causing severe sequence/date skewing, or is it my brain that is skewed? I know this request may seem overboard since these numbers aren't even judged, but I thought I have to go through all this work to drop the rear end, might as well get the right rear end back into the car.
Thanks in advance for any advice or guidance. I'm a big boy, so you can tell me if I'm crazy...it won't be the first time.

Comment