A friend of mine was good enough to provide me with lobe lift vs. cam angle data for the original GM 3849346 ("30-30") camshaft.
I measured lobe lift vs. cam angle from POML to the base circle of an inlet lobe from a CS118R that I have here, and compared the data to that from the original "346". I am happy to report that the correlation between the two is very close. The variance between the two @ POML has the Speed Pro showing .0008 more lift than the "346". This variance diminishes to zero at .0000 lobe lift, which occurs at the same point on both cams: 134 degrees, either direction (ie: opening and closing) from POML. There is a period of about thirty-five degrees (between 30 and 65 degrees from POML), on the opening side, where the CS118R maintains .002 - .007 more lift than the "346", and I doubt whether this would impact engine torque figures in any measurable way.
I measured lobe lift vs. cam angle from POML to the base circle of an inlet lobe from a CS118R that I have here, and compared the data to that from the original "346". I am happy to report that the correlation between the two is very close. The variance between the two @ POML has the Speed Pro showing .0008 more lift than the "346". This variance diminishes to zero at .0000 lobe lift, which occurs at the same point on both cams: 134 degrees, either direction (ie: opening and closing) from POML. There is a period of about thirty-five degrees (between 30 and 65 degrees from POML), on the opening side, where the CS118R maintains .002 - .007 more lift than the "346", and I doubt whether this would impact engine torque figures in any measurable way.
Comment