58 regulator - NCRS Discussion Boards

58 regulator

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Don M.
    Expired
    • September 1, 2008
    • 7

    58 regulator

    Is a 002 regulator ok for a 58 245 hp ? thanks
  • Jack H.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • March 31, 1990
    • 9906

    #2
    Re: 58 regulator

    It will fit and work, mon! The primary difference(s) between '9000, '9001 and '9002 deal with how the internal solenoid air gaps and spring tension adjustments are set (cut-through, current regulation, voltage regulation) to option the regulator for its mating 25, 30, or 35A generator.

    Any competent auto electric shop with good old days working knowledge of generator systems, can remove the cover from the regulator and 'tweak' its internal adjustments to be DEAD NUTS on for your generator/your car. But, absent the fine tune/final centering adjustments, any 9000 series V-reg should install and work...

    Comment

    • Don M.
      Expired
      • September 1, 2008
      • 7

      #3
      Re: 58 regulator

      Thanks for note. Will it be judged as being correct?

      Comment

      • Jack H.
        Extremely Frequent Poster
        • March 31, 1990
        • 9906

        #4
        Re: 58 regulator

        Of course not!

        Comment

        • Dan D.
          Extremely Frequent Poster
          • November 4, 2008
          • 1323

          #5
          Re: 58 regulator

          Do any of these 001,2, or 3 regulators indicate the change from top cover mount screws to side mount? My 57 has top screws but I read somewhere that the change over to side screws occurred in mid 56. It wouldn't surprise me if my regulator is not orginal to the car. -Dan-

          Comment

          • John P.
            Expired
            • August 31, 1991
            • 94

            #6
            Re: 58 regulator

            Don, the 1958 Corvette use the 1119001C regulator.(all h.p.) That is what you will need for judging.They are dated by year and month,so take that into account when looking for one.

            Comment

            • John P.
              Expired
              • August 31, 1991
              • 94

              #7
              Re: 58 regulator

              Dan all of the 111900_ (000,001,002,003) had screws that mounted from the sides of the cover,not thru the top of the cover.That change did happen early in the 1956 model year.

              Comment

              • Jack H.
                Extremely Frequent Poster
                • March 31, 1990
                • 9906

                #8
                Re: 58 regulator

                John speaketh with straight tongue!

                The 8xxx series V-regs were the last to mount the cover with screws through the top corners of the cover. The 9xxx series regulators 'improved' the cover to the base mounting via locating the attaching screws in the outside lower flange area of the cover.

                That shortened (cost reduced) the mounting screws, eliminated the need for washers/gaskets around the head of the screws and moved the holes in the base OUTSIDE cover/base moisture gasket.

                The first variations of 9xxx regulators were embossed with their PN in a single stamp sequence (111900x) and lacked design revision level identifiers (A, B, C, D, Etc.). In 1958, the 1119001C came on stream and to get the identifying emboss to 'fit' on the regulator's mounting ear, the sequence was broken into two stamp lines: "1119" with "001 C" on the line below.

                Note, the consistency of font and its specific placement on the regulator's mounting ears varies considerably from unit to unit. I've seen quite a few of the early 9001 regulators (single stamp line) where the date code was stamped SO CLOSE to the center notch that when the shock/vibration mount insulator was installed, the date code was almost impossible to read/verify...

                Comment

                Working...
                Searching...Please wait.
                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                There are no results that meet this criteria.
                Search Result for "|||"