Correct for 56 oil pan - NCRS Discussion Boards

Correct for 56 oil pan

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Edward M.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • October 31, 1985
    • 1916

    Correct for 56 oil pan

    Guys;

    Is this oil pan correct for a 56 engine?

  • Mike M.
    NCRS Past President
    • May 31, 1974
    • 8366

    #2
    Re: Correct for 56 oil pan

    i like the long and short concavity on the side wall and drain plug location but the pictures aren't good enough to evaluate the transition(on a 45 degree plane) between the first and second steps. btw, i assume you are asking about the 2nd design 56 pan. mike

    Comment

    • Edward M.
      Extremely Frequent Poster
      • October 31, 1985
      • 1916

      #3
      Re: Correct for 56 oil pan

      Yes, 2nd desgin oil pan. It sort of looks OK to me. I'll ask for more pics. Thanks.

      Comment

      • Edward L.
        Expired
        • December 31, 1992
        • 278

        #4
        Re: Correct for 56 oil pan

        Originally posted by Edward McComas (9316)
        Yes, 2nd desgin oil pan. It sort of looks OK to me. I'll ask for more pics. Thanks.

        It is the correct 2nd design (after vin #1600).

        Comment

        • Mike M.
          NCRS Past President
          • May 31, 1974
          • 8366

          #5
          Re: Correct for 56 oil pan

          Originally posted by Edward Lepelis (22093)
          It is the correct 2nd design (after vin #1600).
          ed: i'd wait for better picture before passing judgement on this pan . there is glare in the area where there should not be a concavity but i think i can see the non-original depressions . mike

          Comment

          • Edward M.
            Extremely Frequent Poster
            • October 31, 1985
            • 1916

            #6
            Re: Correct for 56 oil pan

            Originally posted by Mike McCagh (14)
            ed: i'd wait for better picture before passing judgement on this pan . there is glare in the area where there should not be a concavity but i think i can see the non-original depressions . mike
            Mike, are you talking about the small depressions that appear on each side of a passenger car pan?

            Comment

            • Tom P.
              Extremely Frequent Poster
              • March 31, 1980
              • 1814

              #7
              Re: Correct for 56 oil pan

              Originally posted by Edward Lepelis (22093)
              It is the correct 2nd design (after vin #1600).
              Is VIN 1600 the division point between the dipstick pan and the non-dipstick pan?

              Comment

              • Edward M.
                Extremely Frequent Poster
                • October 31, 1985
                • 1916

                #8
                Re: Correct for 56 oil pan

                Got these pics from the seller. Does this help answer the question?
                Attached Files

                Comment

                • Mike M.
                  NCRS Past President
                  • May 31, 1974
                  • 8366

                  #9
                  Re: Correct for 56 oil pan

                  Originally posted by Edward McComas (9316)
                  Got these pics from the seller. Does this help answer the question?
                  pass on that pan ed. the new pictures clearly show the depressions that should not be there for a 56 -7 vette. mike

                  Comment

                  • Edward M.
                    Extremely Frequent Poster
                    • October 31, 1985
                    • 1916

                    #10
                    Re: Correct for 56 oil pan

                    Originally posted by Mike McCagh (14)
                    pass on that pan ed. the new pictures clearly show the depressions that should not be there for a 56 -7 vette. mike
                    Gracias Mike.

                    Comment

                    • Edward L.
                      Expired
                      • December 31, 1992
                      • 278

                      #11
                      Re: Correct for 56 oil pan

                      Originally posted by Tom Parsons (3491)
                      Is VIN 1600 the division point between the dipstick pan and the non-dipstick pan?

                      According to the judging manual, 1600 was the change.

                      Comment

                      • Edward L.
                        Expired
                        • December 31, 1992
                        • 278

                        #12
                        Re: Correct for 56 oil pan

                        Originally posted by Mike McCagh (14)
                        pass on that pan ed. the new pictures clearly show the depressions that should not be there for a 56 -7 vette. mike
                        Mike:

                        I know my vision isn't what it used to be, but the only depressions I see are the two ribs on the side of the pan, one long, one very short. What do you see that I don't?

                        Comment

                        • Mike M.
                          NCRS Past President
                          • May 31, 1974
                          • 8366

                          #13
                          Re: Correct for 56 oil pan

                          Originally posted by Edward Lepelis (22093)
                          Mike:

                          I know my vision isn't what it used to be, but the only depressions I see are the two ribs on the side of the pan, one long, one very short. What do you see that I don't?
                          if you look at the first picture( on the left of the four pics), there are two shiney reflections from the camera's flash. look at the right flash induced shiney spot, and just below it, i see the non-original concavities. the short and long depressions/ribs that are stamped in the vertical plane are correct but the depressed stamping below the right flash spot is what i consider a pass car oil pan. regards,mike

                          Comment

                          • Edward L.
                            Expired
                            • December 31, 1992
                            • 278

                            #14
                            Re: Correct for 56 oil pan

                            Originally posted by Mike McCagh (14)
                            if you look at the first picture( on the left of the four pics), there are two shiney reflections from the camera's flash. look at the right flash induced shiney spot, and just below it, i see the non-original concavities. the short and long depressions/ribs that are stamped in the vertical plane are correct but the depressed stamping below the right flash spot is what i consider a pass car oil pan. regards,mike

                            Mike:

                            I see what your referring to. All due respect, but I think it's a dent. The passenger pan depressions are much larger. The ebay listing has a photo of the inside and there is no evidence of bottom indentations.

                            Comment

                            • Edward M.
                              Extremely Frequent Poster
                              • October 31, 1985
                              • 1916

                              #15
                              Re: Correct for 56 oil pan

                              Originally posted by Edward Lepelis (22093)
                              Mike:

                              I see what your referring to. All due respect, but I think it's a dent. The passenger pan depressions are much larger. The ebay listing has a photo of the inside and there is no evidence of bottom indentations.
                              I think Ed is correct here. I just went out and looked at my 56 passenger car pan; those depressions are very pronounced on the passenger car pan. In any event, this pan will need some straightening repair work.

                              Thanks for all of the input guys.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              Searching...Please wait.
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                              There are no results that meet this criteria.
                              Search Result for "|||"