Early 461 Heads - NCRS Discussion Boards

Early 461 Heads

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Richard T.
    Very Frequent User
    • February 1, 1979
    • 858

    Early 461 Heads

    I'm looking at a pair of early 461 X cylinder heads. Both dated 10-7-61 and each head has the camel hump casting symbol on one end and the pyramid symbol on the other head. Is this typical of early heads or unusual? Rich
  • William C.
    NCRS Past President
    • May 31, 1975
    • 6037

    #2
    Re: Early 461 Heads

    I've never seen that configuration, and I've owned several sets, including the ones on my car that are in that casting sequence, as well as some earlier and later "X" heads. I'd sure want to take a REAL close look in person, and then decide if this was a judging purchase or a racing purchase. Judging I'd probably pass, Racing, anything goes. I assume they have the straight rail on the sides where the valvecover screw holes are, as typical on the "X" heads?
    Bill Clupper #618

    Comment

    • Steven B.
      Extremely Frequent Poster
      • June 30, 1982
      • 3986

      #3
      Re: Early 461 Heads

      Richard, I have had a few sets and have never seen anything like these. Does it look like any of the symbols were "manufactured"? A head with different symbols would have to be cast like that (what are the odds?) or "manufactured" after cast. I would really question if the heads are legitimate.

      Steve

      Comment

      • Mike M.
        NCRS Past President
        • May 31, 1974
        • 8381

        #4
        Re: Early 461 Heads

        i agree with clup and steve. have had many sets of the 461x heads and none match your description. i'd want to carefully examine the camel hump areas for Mr JB Weld.mike

        Comment

        • William C.
          NCRS Past President
          • May 31, 1975
          • 6037

          #5
          Re: Early 461 Heads

          I'd also expect a set that early to have the "Flat" tops on the camel humps.
          Bill Clupper #618

          Comment

          • Richard T.
            Very Frequent User
            • February 1, 1979
            • 858

            #6
            Re: Early 461 Heads

            Guys,
            So far I've only seen pictures and I'm trying to decide if it's worth a few hours driving to inspect them. If everyone thinks they're probably bogus I most likely won't waste my time. Rich

            Comment

            • William C.
              NCRS Past President
              • May 31, 1975
              • 6037

              #7
              Re: Early 461 Heads

              Rich, are the pictures good enough to see the configuration of the camel humps, and/or to see the outboard side of the head where the threaded holes for the rocker cover bolts are. Those are all unique in the early heads.
              Bill Clupper #618

              Comment

              • Richard T.
                Very Frequent User
                • February 1, 1979
                • 858

                #8
                Re: Early 461 Heads

                No they're pretty dark but I'm going to ask for better ones. I'm not sure that I understand what your saying about the side rails though. Rich

                Comment

                • Loren L.
                  Extremely Frequent Poster
                  • April 30, 1976
                  • 4104

                  #9
                  Re: Early 461 Heads

                  Rich, move on to the next ad - you've already attracted the "A" team on your question, and when they come back negative, attend one extra church service this week and be generous in the donation.

                  Comment

                  • William C.
                    NCRS Past President
                    • May 31, 1975
                    • 6037

                    #10
                    Re: Early 461 Heads

                    Rich one of the unique features of the "X" heads is the lack of any reinforcement at the pan rail where the threaded holes are for the rocker cover bolts. I've attached a picture of an "X" head, notice the outboard edge is straight along the line where the rocker cover meets the head, later heads have a "bump-out" to provide more support for the threaded area.
                    Attached Files
                    Bill Clupper #618

                    Comment

                    • Richard T.
                      Very Frequent User
                      • February 1, 1979
                      • 858

                      #11
                      Re: Early 461 Heads

                      Thanks Bill now I see what you mean. Once I get some better pictures I'll post them. Rich

                      Comment

                      • Joe L.
                        Beyond Control Poster
                        • February 1, 1988
                        • 43213

                        #12
                        Re: Early 461 Heads

                        Originally posted by Richard Thomas (2276)
                        I'm looking at a pair of early 461 X cylinder heads. Both dated 10-7-61 and each head has the camel hump casting symbol on one end and the pyramid symbol on the other head. Is this typical of early heads or unusual? Rich
                        Rich-----

                        The casting "symbol" on the ends of the heads is meant to identify the configuration of the head (not by part number but by general characteristics). Your description of the differing casting symbols on each end of these heads presents a "contradictory" configuration. The only way that I could see this happening would be some sort of foundry error, perhaps the use of mis-matched pattern elements. Of course, there's also the possibility of post-foundry "mischief" as Mike described. That should be rather easily discernable, though.
                        In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                        Comment

                        • Richard T.
                          Very Frequent User
                          • February 1, 1979
                          • 858

                          #13
                          Re: Early 461 Heads

                          Joe, I understand all that. I tripped over this situation when I responded to an ad selling 461 heads cast in Oct 61. Both heads were cast on the same date and while looking at the pictures I noticed that there were the two different casting symbols. I asked the seller to check and make sure they were both 461 s and he did, he also claims that each head has a different symbol at each end.

                          Comment

                          • Joe L.
                            Beyond Control Poster
                            • February 1, 1988
                            • 43213

                            #14
                            Re: Early 461 Heads

                            Originally posted by Richard Thomas (2276)
                            Joe, I understand all that. I tripped over this situation when I responded to an ad selling 461 heads cast in Oct 61. Both heads were cast on the same date and while looking at the pictures I noticed that there were the two different casting symbols. I asked the seller to check and make sure they were both 461 s and he did, he also claims that each head has a different symbol at each end.
                            Rich----

                            Cast as early as they were, perhaps that further raises the possibility of foundry "irregularities", especially if they were cast on the same day. If they are authentic and as-described, that's the only reason I could see this happening.
                            In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                            Comment

                            • Richard T.
                              Very Frequent User
                              • February 1, 1979
                              • 858

                              #15
                              Re: Early 461 Heads

                              Well my first thought was that it might be. If I get decent pictures we'll see. Rich

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              Searching...Please wait.
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                              There are no results that meet this criteria.
                              Search Result for "|||"