1969 Crank & W/P Pulleys - NCRS Discussion Boards

1969 Crank & W/P Pulleys

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Michael B.
    Very Frequent User
    • June 18, 2007
    • 400

    1969 Crank & W/P Pulleys

    I just got finished stripping the paint off my crank & water pump pulleys and I see that they are black phosphate finished. Can I assume that when a part, any part, is phosphate finished that it was not painted?
  • Joe L.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • February 1, 1988
    • 43221

    #2
    Re: 1969 Crank & W/P Pulleys

    Originally posted by Michael Brown (47483)
    I just got finished stripping the paint off my crank & water pump pulleys and I see that they are black phosphate finished. Can I assume that when a part, any part, is phosphate finished that it was not painted?
    Michael-----


    Yes, someone must have painted your pullies. Pullies were either painted black or black phosphate-finished. Sometimes, the same pulley part number may be found with either of these finishes. I believe the GM specs provided for either finish optionally. Original pullies from the 60's and early 70's are often found with black phosphate finish, although some were painted. Virtually all the SERVICE pullies available in the past 20 years, or so, including all those of the original part number and still available, are painted or powder-coated black.

    I've never seen a case when an original pulley was painted over black phosphate. Of course, if it ever occurred we'd probably not know about it, anyway, since it would not be readily apparent. However, there would have been absolutely no reason for a manufacturer to use both finishes. It would have added significant cost and was not required.
    In Appreciation of John Hinckley

    Comment

    • Jack H.
      Extremely Frequent Poster
      • April 1, 1990
      • 9906

      #3
      Re: 1969 Crank & W/P Pulleys

      The only explanation for dual coatings that I can fathom would be 'scrap recovery' by the mfgr and/or GM to make parts that were originally plated with insufficient coverage and/or handling surface damage 'useable' again. But, that's a stretch, eh?

      Comment

      Working...
      Searching...Please wait.
      An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

      Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
      An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

      Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
      An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
      There are no results that meet this criteria.
      Search Result for "|||"