Stamp Pad Disaster - NCRS Discussion Boards

Stamp Pad Disaster

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jeff B.
    Very Frequent User
    • November 6, 2008
    • 154

    #16
    Re: Stamp Pad Disaster

    I was working with a shop that is well known for street rods... a completely different craft. He sent it to the machine shop he has worked with for years. There is merrit to what you suggest but as upset as I was I believe the problem was that they were in "street rod" mode and I did not do enough to protect the motor. I'm not defending them but I have to say that other than screwing up the pad, the work has been top drawer in all respects. I have checked all tolerences myself and found them to be right on. I would guess that the person who decked it did was not the owner and probably not experienced with a restoration motor. Thanks for you thoughts on this.

    Comment

    • Jeff B.
      Very Frequent User
      • November 6, 2008
      • 154

      #17
      Re: Stamp Pad Disaster

      Once again my small investment in the membership for NCRS has paid off in spades. It's great to get so many informed opinions. I'm taking the glass half full appraoch, as many of you suggested, just happy there is enough left to ID the motor as original. It will just be part of the story of the car (and a learning experience). I have posted a couple of more positive pictures. The first is of the "bolt sorting table" after the bolts came back from cadmium plating. The second is of the front brakes going back on. Thanks everyone!
      Attached Files

      Comment

      • Tom H.
        Extremely Frequent Poster
        • December 1, 1993
        • 3440

        #18
        Re: Stamp Pad Disaster

        Make sure the guys didn't grind off the headmarks on your bolts !!
        Last edited by Tom H.; February 20, 2009, 08:26 PM.
        Tom Hendricks
        Proud Member NCRS #23758
        NCM Founding Member # 1143
        Corvette Department Manager and
        Specialist for 27 years at BUDS Chevrolet.

        Comment

        • Jim R.
          Very Frequent User
          • June 30, 2001
          • 643

          #19
          Re: Stamp Pad Disaster

          awesome work!
          JR

          Comment

          • Rick S.
            Expired
            • January 1, 2003
            • 1203

            #20
            Re: Stamp Pad Disaster

            Jeff,
            I feel your pain. I had to have my 67 L-79 rebuilt and
            upon a recommendation of a well respected mechanic friend, I had the engine rebuilt by a great rebuilder but not familiar with the importance of the stamp pad. I instructed the rebuilder about that importance and he assured me that he wouldn't deck the block. Well, when I went to pick up the engine I discovered that he tumbled the block for cleaning purposes and I lost my broach marks. The pad looks pretty though!!

            Rick


            Comment

            • Jeff B.
              Very Frequent User
              • November 6, 2008
              • 154

              #21
              Re: Stamp Pad Disaster

              Sorry about that. I bet it runs great though! Did the car Top Flight after this happened? 38 point deduction?

              Comment

              • Rick S.
                Expired
                • January 1, 2003
                • 1203

                #22
                Re: Stamp Pad Disaster

                The engine rebuild was after the Chapter meet judging, so it was a non-issue.
                Rick

                Comment

                • Rob M.
                  NCRS IT Developer
                  • January 1, 2004
                  • 12738

                  #23
                  Re: Stamp Pad Disaster

                  I had a similar case with a correct passenger engine for a '59 which the builder decided to deck (while I did ask not to do this). This didn't only cost me points for an incorrect number sufix (D instead of DQ) but I also lost points for missing teh broach marks.

                  Without the broach marks the numbers aren't to be judged in the first place, correct or incorrect. If I'm correct it costed a total of 88 points (50 + 38). BTW it didn't stop me from scoring a Top Flight with the car afterall...

                  regards,
                  Rob.
                  Rob.

                  NCRS Dutch Chapter Founder & Board Member
                  NCRS Software Developer
                  C1, C2 and C3 Registry Developer

                  Comment

                  • Timothy B.
                    Extremely Frequent Poster
                    • April 30, 1983
                    • 5186

                    #24
                    Re: Stamp Pad Disaster

                    Leave it alone it will be OK, like mentioned above, the only thing you will do is make it worse. Find out the deck clearance and finish the rebuild to achieve max compression with the head gasket selection. Make it run strong!!

                    By the book it's probably the correct way to rebuild a engine anyway.

                    Your lucky, if I put all those bolts in my family room to sort my wife would then

                    Comment

                    • Michael W.
                      Expired
                      • April 1, 1997
                      • 4290

                      #25
                      Re: Stamp Pad Disaster

                      Originally posted by Rob Musquetier (41157)
                      Without the broach marks the numbers aren't to be judged in the first place, correct or incorrect.
                      Incorrect Rob. The three pad features are judged independently of each other.

                      Comment

                      • James W.
                        Extremely Frequent Poster
                        • December 1, 1990
                        • 2655

                        #26
                        Re: Stamp Pad Disaster

                        Originally posted by Rob Musquetier (41157)

                        Without the broach marks the numbers aren't to be judged in the first place, correct or incorrect.

                        regards,
                        Rob.
                        Rob,

                        That would be incorrect. The casting number & case configuration are judged first (350 points). If correct then the casting date (175 points) is judged. If correct then the assembly stamping (25 points) and VIN derivative (25 points). The last item judged are the broach marks for a total of 38 points.

                        James West

                        Comment

                        • Mike M.
                          Director Region V
                          • August 31, 1994
                          • 1463

                          #27
                          Re: Stamp Pad Disaster

                          Jeff
                          There should not be any paint on/in the pad.
                          Smear a little oil on it, take the 38 and move on to more important things.
                          Like Ops at 25 points perline item.
                          Nice work on the frame.
                          I happy to that someone else employs the proper use of a family room for which it was intended.
                          HaND

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          Searching...Please wait.
                          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                          An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                          There are no results that meet this criteria.
                          Search Result for "|||"