Air cleaner snorkle question - NCRS Discussion Boards

Air cleaner snorkle question

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Robert M.
    Expired
    • June 30, 1992
    • 120

    Air cleaner snorkle question

    Hello,
    I've not asked a question in a while, so here goes. Earlier Dennis posted some photos of a late 70 l-46 air cleaner, the enclosed variety.
    What is the purpose of enclosing the air cleaner? and the dual snorkels?

    I assume sound reduction.
  • Jeff W.
    Expired
    • October 31, 2005
    • 272

    #2
    Re: Air cleaner snorkle question

    Good question Robert as I have thought of that many times. For driving around I use an air cleaner lid from an open air cleaner set up that leaves about a 1 inch gap around the outside of the air cleaner. I do enjoy hearing the secondary's kick open where as fully closed you hear very little. I hope someone reply's with the thought behind the design.
    Jeff

    Comment

    • Larry E.
      Extremely Frequent Poster
      • November 30, 1989
      • 1643

      #3
      Re: Air cleaner snorkle question

      Hello:

      One classic example of this would be the 70 Z28 with the LT1. It had duel snorkles. You would
      think they would have put the open element A/C on it like the Corvette.
      They put it on the L34 and not the L78! One possible reason was that the
      air intake was an underhood design rather then a outside hood intake like
      the 1969 H/P Camaro. I believe John DeLoren had something to do with
      this. I hope others would chime in on this.

      Larry
      Larry

      LT1 in a 1LE -- One of 134

      Comment

      • Stuart F.
        Expired
        • August 31, 1996
        • 4676

        #4
        Re: Air cleaner snorkle question

        Don't you suppose it may have had something to do with the emmissions controls. I forget what they called that, something like "thermac", where they used preheated air from around a stove over one of the exhaust manifolds piped to the snorkle for use during the warmup cycle and controlled by a thermostatic vacuum switch and valve. The performance cars were not immune to having these devices. I had a 83 Camaro Z-28 H.O. that had a twin snorkle air cleaner with the two thermac valves, and a chrome lid. I too changed to a tall element which jacked up the lid about an inch. The lid would just barely rub on the underside of the hood (Darn!).

        Comment

        • Joe L.
          Beyond Control Poster
          • January 31, 1988
          • 43191

          #5
          Re: Air cleaner snorkle question

          Originally posted by Stuart Fox (28060)
          Don't you suppose it may have had something to do with the emmissions controls. I forget what they called that, something like "thermac", where they used preheated air from around a stove over one of the exhaust manifolds piped to the snorkle for use during the warmup cycle and controlled by a thermostatic vacuum switch and valve. The performance cars were not immune to having these devices. I had a 83 Camaro Z-28 H.O. that had a twin snorkle air cleaner with the two thermac valves, and a chrome lid. I too changed to a tall element which jacked up the lid about an inch. The lid would just barely rub on the underside of the hood (Darn!).
          Stu and Robert------


          Thermostatic air cleaners did not begin on Corvettes until the 1976 model year. Notwithstanding that, I believe the change to the closed element air cleaners during the 1970 model year was somehow related to emissions control. Just how they provided for any improvement in emissions control, I do not know.
          In Appreciation of John Hinckley

          Comment

          • Jack H.
            Extremely Frequent Poster
            • March 31, 1990
            • 9906

            #6
            Re: Air cleaner snorkle question

            All that comes to my mind is the length & diameter of the snorkles could be 'tuned' to a ressonant frequency to fine tune air flow...

            Comment

            • Alan S.
              Extremely Frequent Poster
              • July 31, 1989
              • 3414

              #7
              Re: Air cleaner snorkle question

              I also always thought there was a technical reason for the change since the dual inlet base would seem to cost more to manufacture than the open base. Too many dollars to make the change just for 'style'.
              Regards,
              Alan
              71 Coupe, 350/270, 4 speed
              Mason Dixon Chapter
              Chapter Top Flight October 2011

              Comment

              • Stuart F.
                Expired
                • August 31, 1996
                • 4676

                #8
                Re: Air cleaner snorkle question

                I think it is like the racing sports cars of late which use an inlet restrictor to sort of govern them down to the competition. Yea! That's it! it was to give the Mustang and other muscle cars of the era a chance to compete for performance. Ah the General! there are some real sporting guys.

                Stu Fox

                Comment

                • Chuck S.
                  Expired
                  • March 31, 1992
                  • 4668

                  #9
                  Re: Air cleaner snorkle question

                  Originally posted by Jack Humphrey (17100)
                  All that comes to my mind is the length & diameter of the snorkles could be 'tuned' to a ressonant frequency to fine tune air flow...
                  Or, to suppress that giant sucking sound when the secondaries opened. GM might have thought that Corvettes were pretty expensive cars for most customers to favor that "no air cleaner" sound.

                  Snorkles were around long before efforts to control emissions were a concern. Early snorkles were tapered with the inlet end smaller than the outlet, like a diffuser, or to contain intake noise.

                  Comment

                  • Jeff W.
                    Expired
                    • October 31, 2005
                    • 272

                    #10
                    Re: Air cleaner snorkle question

                    Not sure who let those people into the design center because that is my favorite sound!

                    Comment

                    • Lawrence M.
                      Very Frequent User
                      • January 31, 1995
                      • 404

                      #11
                      Re: Air cleaner snorkle question

                      I think the enclosed air cleaner was an early attempt to reduce engine noise in the face of impending Federal noise reduction laws.

                      Larry
                      Larry
                      2002 Z51 Convertible
                      1969 L46 Convertible

                      Comment

                      • Stuart F.
                        Expired
                        • August 31, 1996
                        • 4676

                        #12
                        Re: Air cleaner snorkle question

                        If we're going to point the finger at sound, having lived through the period, I'd have to say it was an early attempt to make the Corvette reflect some level of civility. After all, they were only found on the lower performance engines and the folks that ordered those tended toward more civil automobiles like say the T-Birds of the era, i.e. they wanted their cake and to eat it too. And the "Ladies" even ordered Powerglides (or they were ordered for them by their Sugar Daddy).

                        Stu Fox

                        Comment

                        • Chuck S.
                          Expired
                          • March 31, 1992
                          • 4668

                          #13
                          Re: Air cleaner snorkle question

                          Originally posted by Jeff Wilson (44821)
                          Not sure who let those people into the design center because that is my favorite sound!
                          For me, intake noise at full throttle is reminiscent of my old high school "speed mod" of removing the air cleaner.

                          To me, it is a raw, cheap sound that symbolizes a lot of "heat and light", and not much else except backfires and exceptionally poor gas mileage. And that doesn't consider that removing the air cleaner was completely devoid of responsible maintenance practices, but then we were kids.

                          Of course, the effect resulting from this sucking sound is completely dependent on the engine making the sucking sound; in my case it was a 139 cubic inch, flat head truck engine. I think the time to cover the quarter mile was like 30 seconds, but we were measuring it by counting OneMissisippi, TwoMissisippi...; an hourglass would have been more accurate.

                          My transportation preference would be a vehicle like these UFOs some people describe...effortless, instanteous translation from point A to point B with zero sound. My first late model Corvette was a start in the right direction.

                          You know what Teddy said..."Walk softly and carry a big stick." Or, to paraphrase Forest Gump..."(Horsepower) IS as (Horsepower) DOES".
                          Last edited by Chuck S.; February 15, 2009, 10:01 AM.

                          Comment

                          • Stuart F.
                            Expired
                            • August 31, 1996
                            • 4676

                            #14
                            Re: Air cleaner snorkle question

                            Chuck;

                            You crack me up! You know, I still have a beautiful chrome bonnet air cleaner (hog hair or wire mesh?) that I first used on my Dad's 40 Chevy, and that was before I had my license! The thing had a milled head and ran pretty good. My Dad never knew I put that Air Cleaner on there until one day he complained about the noise it made (he had a hearing aid) and I had to fess up. I never thought he'd notice as I always changed his oil. I convinced him to leave it on based on improved gas mileage!

                            Stu Fox

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            Searching...Please wait.
                            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                            An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                            There are no results that meet this criteria.
                            Search Result for "|||"