'58 Correct Ballast Resistor - NCRS Discussion Boards

'58 Correct Ballast Resistor

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ted S.
    Expired
    • December 31, 1997
    • 747

    '58 Correct Ballast Resistor

    Is this the correct ballast resistor configuration for my '58? I've seen alot of different versions with the tab on the bracket.
    Attached Files
  • Mike M.
    NCRS Past President
    • May 31, 1974
    • 8363

    #2
    Re: '58 Correct Ballast Resistor

    that would work for me as it lacks the notches on each ends.mike

    Comment

    • Donald S.
      Very Frequent User
      • August 31, 1996
      • 186

      #3
      Re: '58 Correct Ballast Resistor

      Ted,

      That's the correct resistor; I had an "issue" with the "second team" judges at the Nationals who were claiming I should have the notches but I called in Tim Mickey and along with the photo's that Dennis Sagamang had, they agreed that the "no notch" resistor was correct for '58.
      I've been following your progress here...keep it up!

      Don

      Comment

      • Mike E.
        Extremely Frequent Poster
        • February 28, 1975
        • 5132

        #4
        Re: '58 Correct Ballast Resistor

        Fill everyone in if you will--where are the notches on the incorrect ones?

        Comment

        • Ted S.
          Expired
          • December 31, 1997
          • 747

          #5
          Re: '58 Correct Ballast Resistor

          Mike, the difference is the trough or notches for the terminals run clear to the end of the ceramic like in this picture off of ebay.

          Also notice the difference in the mounting strap end and cutout. In the archives Jack Humphrey wrote that their were two types of ends with the tabs. You can see the difference in those in these two pics. One is rounded and the other is more squared.

          Also the strap can either not have a cutout, a half moon cutout, or the U shaped cut out in this picture. I can't see it real well but the first picture looks like it may have the half moon cutout in the mounting strap.
          Attached Files

          Comment

          • Roy B.
            Expired
            • January 31, 1975
            • 7044

            #6
            Re: '58 Correct Ballast Resistor

            My 55 Corvette

            Comment

            • Mike M.
              NCRS Past President
              • May 31, 1974
              • 8363

              #7
              Re: '58 Correct Ballast Resistor

              Originally posted by Roy Braatz (182)
              My 55 Corvette

              i favor the bracket without any cut-outs(like roy's photo) for the 1955 model year. for the 56 and 57's i favor the bracket with the thumb-nail/half moon cutouts. mike

              Comment

              • Ted S.
                Expired
                • December 31, 1997
                • 747

                #8
                Re: '58 Correct Ballast Resistor

                Mike, What type of cutout for late '58? Thanks Ted

                Comment

                • Mike M.
                  NCRS Past President
                  • May 31, 1974
                  • 8363

                  #9
                  Re: '58 Correct Ballast Resistor

                  haven't ever owned a 58 to 60 so can't say for sure, but the thumb nail/half moon is what i'd use if nobody can say for sure.mike

                  Comment

                  • Doug F.
                    Very Frequent User
                    • October 31, 1983
                    • 322

                    #10
                    Re: '58 Correct Ballast Resistor

                    here are 2 styles of the no cut out resistors the one on the right i marked 56 vet years ago, the one on the right i don't know anything about, it is exactly like the other except for the 1/2 moon cut out near the attaching screw, would both be considered ok ?

                    Comment

                    • Jack H.
                      Extremely Frequent Poster
                      • March 31, 1990
                      • 9906

                      #11
                      Re: '58 Correct Ballast Resistor

                      When I walk/stalk the scrap yards, this style of ceramic + band is what I commonly see on '58 and earlier cars. NOBODY makes a correct repro ballast and there are several reasons why.

                      Yes, the ceramic underwent a change with early resistors NOT having the 'trough' running all the way to the ceramic's outer ends. That's associated with a running change to 'improve' the durability of the ballast and the old/original tooling for this ceramic is history now!

                      Basically, the wiring mounting screws thread into an insert that's press-fit into the ceramic. The early resistors had inserts with a single fold-over tab to lock them into position and the tab was crimped into the 'trough' in the ceramic located between the insert and the center/band area of the ceramic.

                      With age, the crimp tab could deteriorate and fracture. Then, when you went to attach a lead wire to the resistor, the insert was free to 'spin' and the screw fail to torque down nice and tight.

                      The improvement was to extend the 'trough' in the ceramic all the way from the top center to the outer ends. That allowed the use of inserts with TWO fold-over crimp tabs. You wound up with belt and suspenders since it took BOTH of the insert's mounting tabs to break before the insert could free-spin when the wiring retaining screw was torqued down...

                      Comment

                      • Timothy B.
                        Extremely Frequent Poster
                        • April 30, 1983
                        • 5177

                        #12
                        Re: '58 Correct Ballast Resistor

                        Jack,

                        What year did the trough begin and the "U" shaped cut out in the bracket??

                        Comment

                        • Jack H.
                          Extremely Frequent Poster
                          • March 31, 1990
                          • 9906

                          #13
                          Re: '58 Correct Ballast Resistor

                          The earliest I've seen resistors with full length trough is late '58. As far as the 'cutout' in the band goes, I'm not sure if that's a visual ID issue or not (other cars/trucks also used ballast resistors and actual characteristics changed: e.g. mounting methods). So, the side cutout 'may' have been another form of on-the-line visual identification to distinguish the different versions of the ballast. But, that's just a guess....

                          Comment

                          • Ted S.
                            Expired
                            • December 31, 1997
                            • 747

                            #14
                            Re: '58 Correct Ballast Resistor

                            Don, Thanks for the encouragement. Which cutout does your ballast resistor strap have on it (none, half moon, U)? Thanks Ted

                            Comment

                            • Donald S.
                              Very Frequent User
                              • August 31, 1996
                              • 186

                              #15
                              Re: '58 Correct Ballast Resistor

                              Ted,

                              My resistor has no depression or cutout, but it is not original to the car. Mary Jo supplied me with what she termed as 'correct" for my application. As I mentioned it passed the scrutiny from the Team Leader at the Nationals when asked if it was correct; "damn nice example" is what I recall. From my experience, the judges were looking for no "notches" on the ends, the Delco Remy logo and the rough "tang" on the bracket. I see the cutout is mentioned in the JG but I've never had it come up.

                              Don

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              Searching...Please wait.
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                              There are no results that meet this criteria.
                              Search Result for "|||"