C1 Rear Spring Arch - Article? - NCRS Discussion Boards

C1 Rear Spring Arch - Article?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Keith R.
    Very Frequent User
    • August 31, 2001
    • 660

    #16
    Re: C1 Rear Spring Arch - Article?

    Hi Stew,

    Guessing that what that means is that the rebound straps were lengthened to 29.9 inches.

    Originally posted by Stewart Allison (48922)
    Corvette V8 1955 - 1962 complete owners hand book.
    In 1960, further development resulted in a truly '' dual - purpose machine. New front and rear stabilizer bars vastly improved vehicle stability making unnecessary the use of heavy duty springs and shock absorbers for competition. At the same time, riding comfort in normal touring use was not sacrificed.
    Other changes included adding an inch to rear suspension rebound travel for better wheel adhesion under severe road conditions.

    It states that GM has added an inch in rebound travel to the 1960 car. If I'm reading it correctly wouldn't an inch in rebound give the car a higher stance at the rear. Stewy
    Keith MacRae
    NCRS #36692
    New Mexico Chapter
    1960 290HP FI
    2013 427 Convertible

    Shade tree mechanic and
    B-52 pilot extraordinaire

    Comment

    • Steven B.
      Extremely Frequent Poster
      • June 30, 1982
      • 3979

      #17
      Re: C1 Rear Spring Arch - Article?

      Originally posted by Stewart Allison (48922)
      Corvette V8 1955 - 1962 complete owners hand book.
      In 1960, further development resulted in a truly '' dual - purpose machine. New front and rear stabilizer bars vastly improved vehicle stability making unnecessary the use of heavy duty springs and shock absorbers for competition. At the same time, riding comfort in normal touring use was not sacrificed.
      Other changes included adding an inch to rear suspension rebound travel for better wheel adhesion under severe road conditions.

      It states that GM has added an inch in rebound travel to the 1960 car. If I'm reading it correctly wouldn't an inch in rebound give the car a higher stance at the rear. Stewy
      Stew, I have the same book----got it when the 1st ed. came out. I competed with my '57 way back when and used both suspensions on the car at various times, the standard and the HD. There was a noticeable difference in the handling between the two. The HD handled better and I got faster lap times. Although I didn't have the '60 set up a friend did and after alot of tweaking, changing springs, shocks, and bars, the best performing set up was the complete factory HD over the standard on his '60. The extra rebound travel does not refer to ride height, but rather to the available movement of the axle. Over the years these old suspensions sag and the height changes considerably.

      Steve

      Comment

      • Stewart A.
        Expired
        • April 16, 2008
        • 1035

        #18
        Re: C1 Rear Spring Arch - Article?

        I better go back to school and learn how to read again sorry about that. Although I was positive the 60 cars sit higher, all the pictures I see they seem to show more tire at the rear ?
        John Hinkley is extremely sharp on Corvettes and I think he is correct with the car heights. Sagging springs and re tempered stuff could make the car sit at any height.
        So what is the correct height for a 58 - 60 from top of rear arch to ground be ? Is there documentation on the heights of the cars.

        Comment

        • John H.
          Beyond Control Poster
          • November 30, 1997
          • 16513

          #19
          Re: C1 Rear Spring Arch - Article?

          Originally posted by Stewart Allison (48922)
          So what is the correct height for a 58 - 60 from top of rear arch to ground be ? Is there documentation on the heights of the cars.
          GM has never published any dimensions from ground to the top of the wheel openings, as that varies depending on tire size and inflation. They DO publish suspension heights, which are independent of tire sizes - look in UPC 3 or 4 in your Assembly Manual, and you'll find a published dimension "B" from the top of the axle tube to the bottom of the frame rail directly above it, which is the design suspension height.

          Comment

          • Gary C.
            Administrator
            • October 1, 1982
            • 17590

            #20
            Re: C1 Rear Spring Arch - Article?

            Tom, only dimension drawing I've seen is reference in Noland Adam's C1
            book. Scan attached. Gary....
            NCRS Texas Chapter
            https://www.ncrstexas.org/

            https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61565408483631

            Comment

            • John H.
              Beyond Control Poster
              • November 30, 1997
              • 16513

              #21
              Re: C1 Rear Spring Arch - Article?

              Originally posted by Gary Chesnut (5895)
              Tom, only dimension drawing I've seen is reference in Noland Adam's C1
              book. Scan attached. Gary....
              Gary -

              See the '57 Assembly Manual, UPC 3, sheet 4.00, View "C".

              Comment

              • Mark P.
                Very Frequent User
                • May 13, 2008
                • 934

                #22
                Re: C1 Rear Spring Arch - Article?

                I just bought these 1960 springs and it is believed they came off a 25,000 mile car.

                I will check the dimensions when I receive them but was wondering if they look like they need re-arching ?

                If they have the correct dimensions then would you not have to re-arch them ?

                I plan to restore them but would like to avoid the re-arch expense if I can.
                Attached Files

                Comment

                • John H.
                  Beyond Control Poster
                  • November 30, 1997
                  • 16513

                  #23
                  Re: C1 Rear Spring Arch - Article?

                  Originally posted by Mark Pellowski (49021)
                  I just bought these 1960 springs and it is believed they came off a 25,000 mile car.

                  I will check the dimensions when I receive them but was wondering if they look like they need re-arching ?

                  If they have the correct dimensions then would you not have to re-arch them ?

                  I plan to restore them but would like to avoid the re-arch expense if I can.
                  Mark -

                  If they're close to the dimensions noted in post #2 in this thread, I'd just clean them up (or restore them) and use them.

                  Comment

                  • Donald H.
                    Extremely Frequent Poster
                    • November 1, 2009
                    • 2580

                    #24
                    Re: C1 Rear Spring Arch - Article?

                    Originally posted by Mark Pellowski (49021)
                    I just bought these 1960 springs and it is believed they came off a 25,000 mile car.

                    I will check the dimensions when I receive them but was wondering if they look like they need re-arching ?

                    If they have the correct dimensions then would you not have to re-arch them ?

                    I plan to restore them but would like to avoid the re-arch expense if I can.
                    I am by no means an expert, but my springs were pretty sad on my 1960. I have already posted photos in another thread at the link below. Look at the before and how the Main Plate curves back on the front end of the springs. The after is a photo after I got them back from Eaton where they did the shot peening, rearch, heat treating, etc. I have painted, installed the liners but not the bindings yet. For reference the measurement I got was 49 3/8" on center eye-to-eye and 5 1/2" from Main Plate at center bolt to center line of eyes. Using the method from link above to Eaton, I got "Divisional Lengths" of 26 3/4" and 23 7/8"

                    Don Harris
                    Current: 67 convertible Marina Blue L79
                    Former: 60 Red/Red, 2x4, 245hp (Regional and National Top Flight 2013), 66 coupe Nassau Blue, L79 (Chapter and Regional Top Flight 2017)

                    Comment

                    • Mark P.
                      Very Frequent User
                      • May 13, 2008
                      • 934

                      #25
                      Re: C1 Rear Spring Arch - Article?

                      Donald - any pictures of the springs before they were re arched ? Do you know their dimensions at that time ?

                      Thanks,

                      Mark

                      Comment

                      • Gary C.
                        Administrator
                        • October 1, 1982
                        • 17590

                        #26
                        Re: C1 Rear Spring Arch - Article?

                        If springs and body are on the car with reproduction tires. Nominal rear fender center opening height is 28 1/2" from the ground. Gary....
                        NCRS Texas Chapter
                        https://www.ncrstexas.org/

                        https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61565408483631

                        Comment

                        • Donald H.
                          Extremely Frequent Poster
                          • November 1, 2009
                          • 2580

                          #27
                          Re: C1 Rear Spring Arch - Article?

                          Originally posted by Mark Pellowski (49021)
                          Donald - any pictures of the springs before they were re arched ? Do you know their dimensions at that time ?

                          Thanks,

                          Mark
                          Here's a couple of pictures, one while the springs were still on the bare frame and shortly after removal. The red circles show the spring curving back the wrong way. As explained to me in a previous thread, this was probably for a lot of wheel hop in its past life, i.e. lots of drag racing. I did not do any measurements before I had them rearched.
                          Attached Files
                          Don Harris
                          Current: 67 convertible Marina Blue L79
                          Former: 60 Red/Red, 2x4, 245hp (Regional and National Top Flight 2013), 66 coupe Nassau Blue, L79 (Chapter and Regional Top Flight 2017)

                          Comment

                          • John D.
                            Very Frequent User
                            • June 30, 1991
                            • 874

                            #28
                            Re: C1 Rear Spring Arch - Article?

                            Originally posted by John Hinckley (29964)
                            Tom -

                            Per the late Dale Pearman's notes, the C1 spring main leaf was 51" long from the center of the front eye to the center of the rear eye, and the correct unloaded arch (the drop from an imaginary line connecting the centers of the two eyes to the top of the leaf) is 5-1/2" to 5-3/4".
                            john
                            The drawing for 3751438 shows a developed length of 51 +/- 0.12". It does not have a spec for free arch but it states " .08 negative camber under load of 545-605 lbs." at a point at the center

                            Comment

                            • John H.
                              Beyond Control Poster
                              • November 30, 1997
                              • 16513

                              #29
                              Re: C1 Rear Spring Arch - Article?

                              Originally posted by John Daly (19684)
                              john
                              The drawing for 3751438 shows a developed length of 51 +/- 0.12". It does not have a spec for free arch but it states " .08 negative camber under load of 545-605 lbs." at a point at the center
                              Thanks for the info, John. Spring design is more art than science, and I've found that objective measurements in the free state (as indicated in the late Dale Pearman's notes) or as-installed per the Engineering "Z" and "D" ride height dimensions in the A.I.M. can at least move you in the right direction.

                              Not many of us have access to spring load/height/deflection checkers, although Eaton Detroit Spring has several of them so they can correlate to the original drawing load rates.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              Searching...Please wait.
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                              There are no results that meet this criteria.
                              Search Result for "|||"